Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote

Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote Im saying real sportish cars. Like 2013 chargers/challengers/corvettes/vipers/cameros/new mustangs. Those are real cars.

dude a wrx sti can beat almost all of those cars in the first place. A stock wrx sti has around 300 hp STOCK and its a 4 cylinder. You must like muscle cars anyways because thats all you just said most muscle cars are slow anyways other than the vipers

Really? 2012 Charger SRT8 475HP stock 475 Pounds of Torque stock. 6.4L V8 Hemi plus with the new tuner/intake/super charger/exhaust.

Corvette: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Good luck with that. If you even somewhat upgraded the cars i said above, they would kick the **** out of those rice racers. Probably would stock too.

okay now that you have stated that an engine with half the size 4 cylinder 2.5 l has 300 HP an engine with double the size has no more than 175 hp more. thats sad if you ask me and and the wrx sti is awd with alot better handling. the sti would win a street race anyday.

And thats stock. 0-6 in 4.1 seconds. AWD. If you supercharge it that adds another 100+ ish horsepower. That thing would get sh*t on agaisnt any real car.

Sky-Blue wrote People now call all the Tuner cars Ricer for some reason now

You do realize that a "tuner" can still be a "ricer", right?

And yes, this car is riced to shit.

I don't care how fast it is, or that it is TTed, it is ugly as **** and there is absolutely no reason for the tasteless visual mods that add absolutely nothing of value to the car.

I really doubt that car could win any street race like you seem to think, because hit any crack pothole, or rock, and you're done.

Don't get me wrong, I would love to own an STI, but nothing that looks like that.

SPEED wrote

Sky-Blue wrote People now call all the Tuner cars Ricer for some reason now

You do realize that a "tuner" can still be a "ricer", right?

And yes, this car is riced to ****.

I don't care how fast it is, or that it is TTed, it is ugly as **** and there is absolutely no reason for the tasteless visual mods that add absolutely nothing of value to the car.

I really doubt that car could win any street race like you seem to think, because hit any crack pothole, or rock, and you're done.

Don't get me wrong, I would love to own an STI, but nothing that looks like that.

Good point. Im glad someone else has a brain in this forum. LOL! Thanks for clearly it up SPEED!

SPEED wrote

Sky-Blue wrote People now call all the Tuner cars Ricer for some reason now

You do realize that a "tuner" can still be a "ricer", right?

And yes, this car is riced to ****.

I don't care how fast it is, or that it is TTed, it is ugly as **** and there is absolutely no reason for the tasteless visual mods that add absolutely nothing of value to the car.

I really doubt that car could win any street race like you seem to think, because hit any crack pothole, or rock, and you're done.

Don't get me wrong, I would love to own an STI, but nothing that looks like that.

i agree with anyone that thinks the interior looks like trash it does but the exterior is perfect minus the stickers. i would love to own one to

tpayne174 wrote

Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote

Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote Im saying real sportish cars. Like 2013 chargers/challengers/corvettes/vipers/cameros/new mustangs. Those are real cars.

dude a wrx sti can beat almost all of those cars in the first place. A stock wrx sti has around 300 hp STOCK and its a 4 cylinder. You must like muscle cars anyways because thats all you just said most muscle cars are slow anyways other than the vipers

Really? 2012 Charger SRT8 475HP stock 475 Pounds of Torque stock. 6.4L V8 Hemi plus with the new tuner/intake/super charger/exhaust.

Corvette: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Good luck with that. If you even somewhat upgraded the cars i said above, they would kick the **** out of those rice racers. Probably would stock too.

okay now that you have stated that an engine with half the size 4 cylinder 2.5 l has 300 HP an engine with double the size has no more than 175 hp more. thats sad if you ask me and and the wrx sti is awd with alot better handling. the sti would win a street race anyday.

And thats stock. 0-6 in 4.1 seconds. AWD. If you supercharge it that adds another 100+ ish horsepower. That thing would get sh*t on agaisnt any real car.

could you rephrase that. it doesn't make any since

WJL wrote

Minnesota_Nice wrote Not gonna lie it looks pretty damn awful, they ruined a perfectly good STi.

If he gets rid of the ugly green interior, the stupid shift knob, the zebra interior, and about half the stickers.

You gotta remember! Stickers on ricer's add 250hp each!

funny thing is it's not a ricer its called hellaflush and or jdm a ricer is having a wing that is taller than its driver basically and sticker bombing the car also adds class to it and also his opinion of the car its pretty awesome to me

Are you stupid? 2012 charger SRT8. STOCK 475HP. V8 6.4L Hemi. That would probably kick the sh*t out of that. 0-60 in 4.1 seconds. Now supercharge that, put intake on, exhaust, and tune it and you would have zero chance against it...

tpayne174 wrote Are you stupid? 2012 charger SRT8. STOCK 475HP. V8 6.4L Hemi. That would probably kick the sh*t out of that. 0-60 in 4.1 seconds. Now supercharge that, put intake on, exhaust, and tune it and you would have zero chance against it...

your underestimating the power of awd dude. 2012 Wrx Sti specs Stock

2.5L H-4 Power - 305 @ 6,000 rpm - Transmission 6-spd man w/OD - 0-60 5.6 seconds - Drivetrain all wheel Remember thats stock

I'm not much of a car person, but this one is pretty sick.

Symbiote wrote I'm not much of a car person, but this one is pretty sick.

thank you !!!!!!!! someone finally lol