You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#41. Posted:
Sky-Blue
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
tpayne174 wrote And they are still shitty cars. Why buy a sh*tty car to make it look more sh*tty. The chargers look just badass and have an engine to match. Whether it beats a ghetto 1,000 HP Rice racer or not. The charger is still a nicer car. In luxury and performance.


wow really okay your funny let me show you what a real luxury car looks like

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] that is one of the sickest engine bays ive ever seen. and guess what? Its on a Wrx Sti

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] your telling me this looks bad. wow dude you must be blind google stanced sti's.
#42. Posted:
speed
  • TTG Warrior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 200915Year Member
Posts: 9,897
Reputation Power: 3160
Motto: "I'l no I grew up to fast speed I no u will be little famous" - Famous_Energy
Motto: "I'l no I grew up to fast speed I no u will be little famous" - Famous_Energy
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 200915Year Member
Posts: 9,897
Reputation Power: 3160
Motto: "I'l no I grew up to fast speed I no u will be little famous" - Famous_Energy
tpayne174 wrote Ok, first off your grammar sucks... Almost as much as that STi. Second, yes, it is double the size. Thats because its a good car unlike gay subaru's. I mean, if the charger was an SRT8 and it was upgrade; Tuned, exhaust, supercharged that thing would be tasting the exhaust. And i bet everyone would agree with me...


You're just making yourself look like an idiot now.

Subaru makes great cars. The fact that a 4 cylinder engine can even keep up with bigger cars is awesome.

You also seem to be forgetting that the SRT8 starts at 45k, while a STI starts at 34k.
#43. Posted:
Sky-Blue
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
tpayne174 wrote This: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

VS

This: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


LOL. Wonder which one looks better and is clearly better all around...

you picked a tock sti and that is the base line model anyways.

on top your photo is edited anyways
#44. Posted:
Jeez
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
Sky-Blue wrote
tpayne174 wrote And they are still shitty cars. Why buy a sh*tty car to make it look more sh*tty. The chargers look just badass and have an engine to match. Whether it beats a ghetto 1,000 HP Rice racer or not. The charger is still a nicer car. In luxury and performance.


wow really okay your funny let me show you what a real luxury car looks like

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] that is one of the sickest engine bays ive ever seen. and guess what? Its on a Wrx Sti

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] your telling me this looks bad. wow dude you must be blind google stanced sti's.

If thats luxury to you than you need a new job and some class... All i see is a decent LOOKING engine and a shitty shell. Ill give you that, the engine looks pretty nice. But that doesnt mean anything. And how does that look nice to you..? That looks like complete shit.

Decently luxury interior...

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#45. Posted:
Sky-Blue
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
SPEED wrote
tpayne174 wrote Ok, first off your grammar sucks... Almost as much as that STi. Second, yes, it is double the size. Thats because its a good car unlike gay subaru's. I mean, if the charger was an SRT8 and it was upgrade; Tuned, exhaust, supercharged that thing would be tasting the exhaust. And i bet everyone would agree with me...


You're just making yourself look like an idiot now.

Subaru makes great cars. The fact that a 4 cylinder engine can even keep up with bigger cars is awesome.

You also seem to be forgetting that the SRT8 starts at 45k, while a STI starts at 34k.


thankyou someone finally agrees with me
i never said that a subi is better just you think muscle is alot better which is wrong
#46. Posted:
Sky-Blue
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
tpayne174 wrote
Sky-Blue wrote
tpayne174 wrote And they are still shitty cars. Why buy a sh*tty car to make it look more sh*tty. The chargers look just badass and have an engine to match. Whether it beats a ghetto 1,000 HP Rice racer or not. The charger is still a nicer car. In luxury and performance.


wow really okay your funny let me show you what a real luxury car looks like

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] that is one of the sickest engine bays ive ever seen. and guess what? Its on a Wrx Sti

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] your telling me this looks bad. wow dude you must be blind google stanced sti's.

If thats luxury to you than you need a new job and some class... All i see is a decent LOOKING engine and a shitty shell. Ill give you that, the engine looks pretty nice. But that doesnt mean anything. And how does that look nice to you..? That looks like complete ****.

Decently luxury interior...

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


and this isint a luxury interior?

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#47. Posted:
Jeez
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
Sky-Blue wrote
tpayne174 wrote This: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

VS

This: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


LOL. Wonder which one looks better and is clearly better all around...

you picked a tock sti and that is the base line model anyways.

on top your photo is edited anyways

How is it edited?! Im showing you that the body clearly looks 529968 times better... And looks sexier. And says "speed" That shitty STi screams "rice racer" and "Im not fast but listen to my exhaust... and look at my 3 foot tall spoiler that makes my car go faster"
#48. Posted:
Jeez
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
SPEED wrote
tpayne174 wrote Ok, first off your grammar sucks... Almost as much as that STi. Second, yes, it is double the size. Thats because its a good car unlike gay subaru's. I mean, if the charger was an SRT8 and it was upgrade; Tuned, exhaust, supercharged that thing would be tasting the exhaust. And i bet everyone would agree with me...


You're just making yourself look like an idiot now.

Subaru makes great cars. The fact that a 4 cylinder engine can even keep up with bigger cars is awesome.

You also seem to be forgetting that the SRT8 starts at 45k, while a STI starts at 34k.

And im not saying that dont make good cars. Im saying people make them look stupid when they put the stupid boddy kits/stickers/spoilers on them. Subaru does make a decent car. When the owners dont ruin them.
#49. Posted:
Sky-Blue
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 443
Reputation Power: 17
tpayne174 wrote
Sky-Blue wrote
tpayne174 wrote This: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

VS

This: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


LOL. Wonder which one looks better and is clearly better all around...

you picked a tock sti and that is the base line model anyways.

on top your photo is edited anyways

How is it edited?! Im showing you that the body clearly looks 529968 times better... And looks sexier. And says "speed" That shitty STi screams "rice racer" and "Im not fast but listen to my exhaust... and look at my 3 foot tall spoiler that makes my car go faster"

what 3 foot tall spoiler. i hate when people have those on their cars.
#50. Posted:
Jeez
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,506
Reputation Power: 101
Sky-Blue wrote
tpayne174 wrote
Sky-Blue wrote
tpayne174 wrote And they are still shitty cars. Why buy a sh*tty car to make it look more sh*tty. The chargers look just badass and have an engine to match. Whether it beats a ghetto 1,000 HP Rice racer or not. The charger is still a nicer car. In luxury and performance.


wow really okay your funny let me show you what a real luxury car looks like

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] that is one of the sickest engine bays ive ever seen. and guess what? Its on a Wrx Sti

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] your telling me this looks bad. wow dude you must be blind google stanced sti's.

If thats luxury to you than you need a new job and some class... All i see is a decent LOOKING engine and a shitty shell. Ill give you that, the engine looks pretty nice. But that doesnt mean anything. And how does that look nice to you..? That looks like complete ****.

Decently luxury interior...

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


and this isint a luxury interior?

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Not saying that isnt. But over all the charger looks more luxurious. Inside and out. I mean, we are never gonna end this. You like rice racers better, i like pure american muscle better. OPINIONS
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.