You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#51. Posted:
Tywin
  • Tutorial King
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Mkz wrote No should not be legal some twisted **** wants to take out an innocent child think for others not yourself.


90% of abortions are done before 13 weeks, when the "child" is a 7 inch glob of goop.
You're telling me that if your mother or sister was raped, you'd tell her to keep her mouth shut and have the baby?
#52. Posted:
ProfessorNobody
  • Winter 2017
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Lavish wrote
Mkz wrote No should not be legal some twisted **** wants to take out an innocent child think for others not yourself.


90% of abortions are done before 13 weeks, when the "child" is a 7 inch glob of goop.
You're telling me that if your mother or sister was raped, you'd tell her to keep her mouth shut and have the baby?


He's probably saying that glob of goop should have second amendment rights too.
Hospitals will need to get court orders before they can do ultrasounds to protect the glob of goop from unreasonable search and seizure.
#53. Posted:
Fielding
  • Shoutbox Hero
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
If you're not ready for parenthood, absolutely. If a mothers life is in danger, absolutely. If the child will be born with life altering and devestating problems, absolutely. It's the choice of the person carrying the child, simple as that (obviously with discussions involving the father. Ultimately, however, it should be the mothers choice in this instance).
#54. Posted:
Fielding
  • Shoutbox Hero
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
Fimvark wrote Absolutely should be illegal
If your man enough to *** up in her then you
Need to be man enough to raise a kid

Why take a life that never had a choice
Think of it this way what if it was you?
If you say it should be legal then what would happen if you where aborted you would of never been here

Either have safe sex or don't have sex unless you want a kid SIMPLE
Don't blame your surrounding
It's wrong to take a life
If abortion should be legal so should murder
And we kill everyone


Completely disagree. You can't compare killing cells that are developing in the uterus to full grown humans. As for what, being aborted yourself? You'd have no opinion on it, you'd never have existed. I don't see what point you're trying to make there.
#55. Posted:
Azir
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 10, 201113Year Member
Posts: 466
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 10, 201113Year Member
Posts: 466
Reputation Power: 17
I believe it should be a choice. But i also dont dwell on this topic as much seeing as how there are far many more issues that need to be addressed rather than, "should i cut and run, or raise this thing?" because lets be honest here, the world is effed.
#56. Posted:
Visxal
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,261
Reputation Power: 332
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,261
Reputation Power: 332
Should be legal for some situations e.g. r*pe. Otherwise is shouldn't be allowed for situations where they just don't want the baby.
#57. Posted:
Fielding
  • Shoutbox Hero
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
Visxal wrote Should be legal for some situations e.g. r*pe. Otherwise is shouldn't be allowed for situations where they just don't want the baby.
Dont want to bring a child into the world cause you won't be able t financially support it. But that should be illegal cause they weren't raped?
#58. Posted:
PurpxOG
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 19, 20168Year Member
Posts: 404
Reputation Power: 37
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 19, 20168Year Member
Posts: 404
Reputation Power: 37
It has nothing to do with your opponion if the dam child is dead **** up
#59. Posted:
IPv6
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 21, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,231
Reputation Power: 201
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 21, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,231
Reputation Power: 201
DF wrote If you're not ready for parenthood, absolutely. If a mothers life is in danger, absolutely. If the child will be born with life altering and devestating problems, absolutely. It's the choice of the person carrying the child, simple as that (obviously with discussions involving the father. Ultimately, however, it should be the mothers choice in this instance).
"If the child will be born with life altering and devestating problems" So your saying that if they know the baby is going to have a birth defect then just **** it the baby don't have the right to live. I was born with a heart condition and had 3 major heart surgery's and at 17 had a heart transplant, i did have "devastating problems" but i fought hard until i finally had my transplant. Im really glad my parents didn't think like this and just took the easy road out they had the option to pull the plug but they didn't and im alive and health today. Reading that just made me sick.
#60. Posted:
Fielding
  • Shoutbox Hero
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
IPv6 wrote
DF wrote If you're not ready for parenthood, absolutely. If a mothers life is in danger, absolutely. If the child will be born with life altering and devestating problems, absolutely. It's the choice of the person carrying the child, simple as that (obviously with discussions involving the father. Ultimately, however, it should be the mothers choice in this instance).
"If the child will be born with life altering and devestating problems" So your saying that if they know the baby is going to have a birth defect then just **** it the baby don't have the right to live. I was born with a heart condition and had 3 major heart surgery's and at 17 had a heart transplant, i did have "devastating problems" but i fought hard until i finally had my transplant. Im really glad my parents didn't think like this and just took the easy road out they had the option to pull the plug but they didn't and im alive and health today. Reading that just made me sick.


A life altering disability, permanent incapacity. I did not say that the baby doesn't have a right to live, that is a complete fallacy. I'm sorry for what you've been through, but don't try and turn my post into something it isnt
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.