watch this vid: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote Are you stupid? 2012 charger SRT8. STOCK 475HP. V8 6.4L Hemi. That would probably kick the sh*t out of that. 0-60 in 4.1 seconds. Now supercharge that, put intake on, exhaust, and tune it and you would have zero chance against it...

your underestimating the power of awd dude. 2012 Wrx Sti specs Stock

2.5L H-4 Power - 305 @ 6,000 rpm - Transmission 6-spd man w/OD - 0-60 5.6 seconds - Drivetrain all wheel Remember thats stock

Actually im not. The 2012 charger srt8 specs. 8.4L Hemi -475 @ 6,000 RPM - Transmission (6 speed? Not 100% sure) Automatic - 0-60 4.1 seconds - Drivetrain all wheel. Thats all stock too. Seem to me like the Charge will win...

Sky-Blue wrote watch this vid: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Notice how the charger was also stock... And im talking about an SRT8, not R/T. STI was upgraded, charger was stock and it still only lost by a few car lengths.

tpayne174 wrote

Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote Are you stupid? 2012 charger SRT8. STOCK 475HP. V8 6.4L Hemi. That would probably kick the sh*t out of that. 0-60 in 4.1 seconds. Now supercharge that, put intake on, exhaust, and tune it and you would have zero chance against it...

your underestimating the power of awd dude. 2012 Wrx Sti specs Stock

2.5L H-4 Power - 305 @ 6,000 rpm - Transmission 6-spd man w/OD - 0-60 5.6 seconds - Drivetrain all wheel Remember thats stock

Actually im not. The 2012 charger srt8 specs. 8.4L Hemi -475 @ 6,000 RPM - Transmission (6 speed? Not 100% sure) Automatic - 0-60 4.1 seconds - Drivetrain all wheel. Thats all stock too. Seem to me like the Charge will win...

Yes but if you look at it as the engine is almost 3x bigger so their is alomst an unfair advantage. And did you watch that vid?

By far one of the most horrible looking sti's i've ever seen, why lower a that car that much, the body kit ain't the best and where is the big back spoiler it's a main feature of the subaru ?

Just my verdict!

Mck wrote By far one of the most horrible looking sti's i've ever seen, why lower a that car that much, the body kit ain't the best and where is the big back spoiler it's a main feature of the subaru ?

Just my verdict!

well the only reason to go that low is for the handling on the racetrack

Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote

Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote Are you stupid? 2012 charger SRT8. STOCK 475HP. V8 6.4L Hemi. That would probably kick the sh*t out of that. 0-60 in 4.1 seconds. Now supercharge that, put intake on, exhaust, and tune it and you would have zero chance against it...

your underestimating the power of awd dude. 2012 Wrx Sti specs Stock

2.5L H-4 Power - 305 @ 6,000 rpm - Transmission 6-spd man w/OD - 0-60 5.6 seconds - Drivetrain all wheel Remember thats stock

Actually im not. The 2012 charger srt8 specs. 8.4L Hemi -475 @ 6,000 RPM - Transmission (6 speed? Not 100% sure) Automatic - 0-60 4.1 seconds - Drivetrain all wheel. Thats all stock too. Seem to me like the Charge will win...

Yes but if you look at it as the engine is almost 3x bigger so their is alomst an unfair advantage. And did you watch that vid?

Ok, first off your grammar sucks... Almost as much as that STi. Second, yes, it is double the size. Thats because its a good car unlike gay subaru's. I mean, if the charger was an SRT8 and it was upgrade; Tuned, exhaust, supercharged that thing would be tasting the exhaust. And i bet everyone would agree with me...

tpayne174 wrote

Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote

Sky-Blue wrote

tpayne174 wrote Are you stupid? 2012 charger SRT8. STOCK 475HP. V8 6.4L Hemi. That would probably kick the sh*t out of that. 0-60 in 4.1 seconds. Now supercharge that, put intake on, exhaust, and tune it and you would have zero chance against it...

your underestimating the power of awd dude. 2012 Wrx Sti specs Stock

2.5L H-4 Power - 305 @ 6,000 rpm - Transmission 6-spd man w/OD - 0-60 5.6 seconds - Drivetrain all wheel Remember thats stock

Actually im not. The 2012 charger srt8 specs. 8.4L Hemi -475 @ 6,000 RPM - Transmission (6 speed? Not 100% sure) Automatic - 0-60 4.1 seconds - Drivetrain all wheel. Thats all stock too. Seem to me like the Charge will win...

Yes but if you look at it as the engine is almost 3x bigger so their is alomst an unfair advantage. And did you watch that vid?

Ok, first off your grammar sucks... Almost as much as that STi. Second, yes, it is double the size. Thats because its a good car unlike gay subaru's. I mean, if the charger was an SRT8 and it was upgrade; Tuned, exhaust, supercharged that thing would be tasting the exhaust. And i bet everyone would agree with me...

see your talking about upgrades. people have sti's pushing over 1,000 HP on a 4 cylinder engine

now lets compare that srt8 to a supra or an evo 10 lets see who will win now

And they are still shitty cars. Why buy a sh*tty car to make it look more sh*tty. The chargers look just badass and have an engine to match. Whether it beats a ghetto 1,000 HP Rice racer or not. The charger is still a nicer car. In luxury and performance.

This: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

VS

This: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


LOL. Wonder which one looks better and is clearly better all around...