You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201211Year Member
Posts: 633
Reputation Power: 26
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201211Year Member
Posts: 633
Reputation Power: 26
-Night wrote These are my 2 teams
Team 1:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Team 2:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Amazing teams, only lost 2 games and a couple of draws of the 35 games i played with these.
I would do anything for both of them teams aha
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201112Year Member
Posts: 4,366
Reputation Power: 357
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201112Year Member
Posts: 4,366
Reputation Power: 357
Is Eriksen really the man you want in LF?
Surely that forces counter-attacks to the right-hand side making your team rather easy to predict and defend against
It does the job but I'd be keen to alter to a 4-3-3(4) pushing the wingers wider and allowing for a playmaking CAM
Surely that forces counter-attacks to the right-hand side making your team rather easy to predict and defend against
It does the job but I'd be keen to alter to a 4-3-3(4) pushing the wingers wider and allowing for a playmaking CAM
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201211Year Member
Posts: 633
Reputation Power: 26
OhDiegoCosta wrote Is Eriksen really the man you want in LF?
Surely that forces counter-attacks to the right-hand side making your team rather easy to predict and defend against
It does the job but I'd be keen to alter to a 4-3-3(4) pushing the wingers wider and allowing for a playmaking CAM
Like you said if people are predicting i am going to use the right side i can play eriksen through
He's got an amazing pass to set the other two up so it works really
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.