-Sam- wrote You say your sick of seeing these kind of threads...

And then you go and make one..

diggitydog41 wrote OK both games are both extremely good but in different ways. You can call people Cod or battlefield fan boys all you want but it all depends on the type of game you want to play. If you want a fast past action around every corner really high kills and deaths per game (like 40-10 per 10 minute game) you want to play cod exactly for that reason. Cod has smaller maps and you are more likely to encounter enemies much more often. The graphics may not be as detailed as battlefield like a bullets in the mag while cod has a block in it. But really cod has so much other stuff that people like about the game. Now on the other hand if you like longer, more real life games with helicopters tanks, ext on the maps like real life with fewer kills and deaths (im talking 30 kills and 20 deaths per game which is 30 minutes long) then thats your kind of game. The graphics sure are hell of a lot better than cod's. Now I love both COD and Battlefield and if you don't like both then thats your personal preference. Now stop comparing the two because they are two completely different styles of games.

Rant over.

tldr: Both cod and battlefield are good in their own different ways. One game is better than the other in certain aspects and vice versa.

joel69 wrote

-Sam- wrote You say your sick of seeing these kind of threads...

And then you go and make one..

I think he wanted it to be a thread where everybody came to an understanding that we should not judge each game on what's going to be better. And also it will make less unnecessary topics