You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,154
Reputation Power: 48
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,154
Reputation Power: 48
My opinion is that I have never liked anythign about any battlefieldss MW3<3
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 03, 200915Year Member
Posts: 2,505
Reputation Power: 425
Status: Offline
Joined: May 03, 200915Year Member
Posts: 2,505
Reputation Power: 425
bf3 is definitely better but mw3 will sell alot more because of franchise!
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 621
Reputation Power: 26
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 621
Reputation Power: 26
a77u wrote So here is the truth that most of you cant accept:
BF3 is superior in almost every way. You have destructible environments, a story that actually is plausible and fun, the multiplayer has way more options and bigger maps, player counts, VEHICLES!!!. On the graphics side, no matter what youre playing on, BF3 will have better graphics and an up to date engine unlike MW3 which will be using the same engine as MW2 and Black Ops. I know you fanboys want to waste your money on it because its a Cod. go ahead and do it.
Your wrong about a couple things it is a diff engine and it only has like 4 more players in matchmaking
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 04, 200915Year Member
Posts: 461
Reputation Power: 17
RosaGotGAME wrote HAHA LMFAO (THE TRUTH) what you mean is a (BIASED OPINION). COD is fun because it has smaller enviornments, and moves at 60 fps Only fanboy here is you.
bf3 will not be limited unless you have it on the console
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 04, 200915Year Member
Posts: 461
Reputation Power: 17
TTG-Freak wrotea77u wrote So here is the truth that most of you cant accept:
BF3 is superior in almost every way. You have destructible environments, a story that actually is plausible and fun, the multiplayer has way more options and bigger maps, player counts, VEHICLES!!!. On the graphics side, no matter what youre playing on, BF3 will have better graphics and an up to date engine unlike MW3 which will be using the same engine as MW2 and Black Ops. I know you fanboys want to waste your money on it because its a Cod. go ahead and do it.
Your wrong about a couple things it is a diff engine and it only has like 4 more players in matchmaking
wrong: 64-player battles
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 04, 200915Year Member
Posts: 461
Reputation Power: 17
OxMotoxO wrote Ok, well while you're enjoying your shitty game, I'll be playing MW3. The game that will come out on top. MW2's engine was perfect and not everyone cares for destructible environments. And the movement on BF is way to god damn slow. It shouldn't take 5 seconds to turn around on full sensitivity. BF's engine looks like an improved black ops one, a god damn cartoon. Btw, MW2 and Black Ops have different engines.
it shouldnt take 20 feet drops to kill people, it shouldnt take .5 seconds to pull a gun off of your back, it shouldnt take .2 seconds to pull a knife off your vest and stab someone.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 621
Reputation Power: 26
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 621
Reputation Power: 26
a77u wroteTTG-Freak wrotea77u wrote So here is the truth that most of you cant accept:
BF3 is superior in almost every way. You have destructible environments, a story that actually is plausible and fun, the multiplayer has way more options and bigger maps, player counts, VEHICLES!!!. On the graphics side, no matter what youre playing on, BF3 will have better graphics and an up to date engine unlike MW3 which will be using the same engine as MW2 and Black Ops. I know you fanboys want to waste your money on it because its a Cod. go ahead and do it.
Your wrong about a couple things it is a diff engine and it only has like 4 more players in matchmaking
wrong: 64-player battles
on pc only not consoles
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 04, 200915Year Member
Posts: 461
Reputation Power: 17
TTG-Freak wrotea77u wroteTTG-Freak wrotea77u wrote So here is the truth that most of you cant accept:
BF3 is superior in almost every way. You have destructible environments, a story that actually is plausible and fun, the multiplayer has way more options and bigger maps, player counts, VEHICLES!!!. On the graphics side, no matter what youre playing on, BF3 will have better graphics and an up to date engine unlike MW3 which will be using the same engine as MW2 and Black Ops. I know you fanboys want to waste your money on it because its a Cod. go ahead and do it.
Your wrong about a couple things it is a diff engine and it only has like 4 more players in matchmaking
wrong: 64-player battles
on pc only not consoles
no, really? console versions are limited in different ways. the only way you can get most out of the game is by having it on the pc
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,466
Reputation Power: 63
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,466
Reputation Power: 63
Umm...no ever since mw2 came out people went all hyper and crap and after i play awhile i heard about the game(like when the reseg pack came out xD) you call that a hit selling game?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 158
Reputation Power: 6
Modern Warfare 3 Stinks End Of Discussion!
Looks Like Mw2 And Mw3 Stole 3 Ideas From BF3! The Maps Paris And Mogadishu! And Also Destruction!
Looks Like Mw2 And Mw3 Stole 3 Ideas From BF3! The Maps Paris And Mogadishu! And Also Destruction!
- 0useful
- 1not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.