-Frostbite- wrote

Keenam69 wrote Mw3 > BC2. Competitive wise. GameBattles, Decreto ect. Simply because its more team based.

Yepp Agree. Too many fanboys around TTG.

lol team based? mw3? lol. CoD has zero teamwork. in battlefield, if u dont have teamwork. Its obvious that your bad at the game.

I LOVE BATTLEFIELD!
It's so action packed and teambased.

This all depends on what you like. I dont really like battlefield 2 online but the campaigh was good like the 1st one. MW3 will have better online

Keenam69 wrote Mw3 > BC2. Competitive wise. GameBattles, Decreto ect. Simply because its more team based.

Team based!

All you do is run around and shoot!

If you want a game that takes Strategy Battlefield series is out there 8)

you can quickscope in BF2 lol
atleast i can.
i dont have it for my xbox
but i played my friends ps3
and i quickscoped fairly well

no it wont sorry it just wont nothing can beat call of duty

Here's my thoughts:

COD = Boring and a ton of bullsh*t.

Battlefield series = Fun, better sound and graphics, dedicated servers AND a balanced game.

COD will win the best seller, but that does not mean it's a better game..it just means the 10 year olds bought it over BFBC3 just so they can do their 1337 no scopes and what not.

Constructionz wrote no it wont sorry it just wont nothing can beat call of duty

This is true, People have been playing call of duty for a long time and now even
if a game sucks, alot of people will still be playing, Except Black ops
MW2 for example, many players said that it sucked and yet they still play it
MW2 did many things right, And did one wrong thing, the noobtubes.
Black ops had some good ideas, but alot of their ideas sucked and ended up ruining the game. one thing im sure of is that zombies was done right

I CANT DECIDE I WANT TO PLAY BOTH AT TEH SAME TIME!

Yes i played battlefield 2 and i played black ops, i think battlefield is way better than black ops indeed.