im really looking forward to DICE's new engine and lately all the call of duty games have just been pissing me off. I think mw3 will sell more but wont be as good as BF3. and im a fan of both series.

Well I just wanted to say BF3. Although I am more of a BF player I would obviously choose BF3. Anyways, MW3 is a good game, so far (the trailers and short gameplays) the game is interesting.

I am getting both games.

Thay Add Epic **** Elements. Such As Destrution. Mw3 A **** Noobtube Won hurt a glassbox. Its Dumb and unrealistic. If your looking for a more arcade based shooter. Then mw3 is your best bet.
But if your looking for a realistic bad ass game. You might as well drop this little grudge you hold because you know dice's games are better and pick up BF3

Jtags4Nuns wrote

JeeezusChrist wrote I love how everyone is so quick to dump modern warfare 3 because if you knew anything than you'd know modern warfare 3 is running in frostbite 2.0 also. On top of that, where are you getting your info that Battlefield is going to be better? No where. The battlefield series is a good series don't get me wrong but call of duty has been the game since cod 4 came out and your trying to tell me a game with that much reputation is going to fail, is going to be overpowered, is going to suck? I'll agree with the next guy that Black ops was a disaster but modern warfare 1 and modern warfare 2 are by far better games than battlefield 3 will be and that's not even to mention what modern warfare 3 is going to make it look like.
Oh yeah and way to be completely byist in your poles

First Off.... Modern Warfare Running On Frostbite 2.0? Ha.. CoD Have Used The Same *Core* Engine Since CoD 4, This will be no Different, Maybe Some New Guns And 'Slightly' Better Graphics... Overall Battlefield 3 Will Crush CoD Anyday For me.. Tbh Batlefield 2 Did

First off you troll. Frostbite 2.0 Is the best engine out. And it is only bieng used by Dice. So drop that thought. Second Off were completely biased Call of Duty 4 was not the best game of its time in fact Halo 3 Beat the shit out of it that year. Second off call of duty has lost so mannyy players due to extreme modding. Look At Waw, Cod 4 Amd Mw2 You can even play. So before you call someone else biased Check Yourself :trollin: This Post Deserves Way more Than Just A :facepalm: it deserves a :russianroulette:

I love the campaign in those games. But I am not a judge fan of the multiplayer I takes to long to kill someone. I am a fan of the snipIng though you just have to play it on hardcore. That is my opinion.

IDeVoNI wrote I love the campaign in those games. But I am not a judge fan of the multiplayer I takes to long to kill someone. I am a fan of the snipIng though you just have to play it on hardcore. That is my opinion.

Hardcore sniping is for people who can't snipe in Core.

MW3 is going to be relatively similar to the previous games. But I think BF3 will be unique, have a better online, better campaign and a much warmer feel to it than MW3. Im still buying both of them though!

Muff_Cabbage wrote People say that CoD is nothing new but what's so revolutionary about BF3 besides a new engine? Oh wait, YOU CAN FINALLY GO PRONE. That's the only thing that's new to Battlefield.

MW3 > BF3

. Actually you could go prone in most the battlefields except Bad Co. Also Frostbite 2.0 is one of the best game engines ever made. MW3 is running on the MW2 engine if IW wants a good game they should have made a good new engine.

Ambicidal wrote

Muff_Cabbage wrote People say that CoD is nothing new but what's so revolutionary about BF3 besides a new engine? Oh wait, YOU CAN FINALLY GO PRONE. That's the only thing that's new to Battlefield.

MW3 > BF3

'scuse me? The only new thing? No. Again, to the people who post in my thread, get your facts straight. Keep in mind new things aren't necessarily better. The classes have changed in BF3, engine is new(took a few years to make, and CoD is using same engine since cod4), suppressing fire feature(little is known), better sound quality and video quality, completely destructible environments(never been done). Battlefield has everything new. The only new thing I've seen with CoD is switching scopes, and if thats why your buying it then have fun bro. :trollin:

Quick thing every game that says to have an completely destructible enviroment has always failed epicly at it what going to make BF3 any different?

maniac3456 wrote

-LinkinPark- wrote I wouldn't say Battlefield are harder than CoD. There more strategic than CoD's multiplayer and working as a team plays a big part in it.

Frostbite 2.0 is the best game engine out right now and IW's is too outdated to be as good as DICE's.

BF3 will be better this year even if MW3 sells more.

You are wrong. If MW3 sells more and has more players, then it is better. Nobody cares about graphics. I would play Call of Duty if it were in 2D. I wouldn't care. There is more teamplay and strategy in Call of Duty and it is easier for beginners to get used to

No sir i believe you are mistaken. BF has more strategy than CoD. In MW2 all you have to do is camp and you can get a nuke. Also it is proven that on your own not in teams you get larger killstreaks