You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
What really happens after we die [Theory]
Posted:
What really happens after we die [Theory]Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201113Year Member
Posts: 435
Reputation Power: 20
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201113Year Member
Posts: 435
Reputation Power: 20
This is not MY post, But i read it all and it makes alot of sense if you actually think about it, I personally believe in God and believe this can be interpreted to going to "Heaven" or some sort of Afterlife.
I believe that the unexplained phenomenon of a sudden surge in neural brain activity and pupil dilation the instance before death reflects on the similarity between the collapse of a neutron star and the formation of a black hole. Yeah, sounds ridiculous right? However, let me explain myself before you rush to dismiss my idea.
To understand better, Einsteins simple Theory of Relativity needs to be understood. Einstein predicted that time relative to anything approaching the speed of light will in effect, slow down.
Knowing this, it is also important to note that light reflects from every area of an eye, but light does not bounce away from the pupil. Light rays are absorbed into the pupil where they become focused by the crystalline lens into something called the 'nodal point', where they then converge, flip over, and upon reaching the back of the retina are translated (signal transduction) into neural data the brain can understand. With a black hole, light acts in a very similar manner. Light rays do not bounce off. They are sucked into the inner horizon where they are then infinitely crushed and condensed into a single point (the singularity point).
It is still unknown where anything that enters a black hole goes. But it is theorized that everything is infinitely condensed into a single point (the singularity). Using Roy Kerrs mathematical equations regarding spinning black holes as a reference, a man named John Gribbon (PhD in Astrophysics) states that, as anything passes through the singularity, it enters a region of spacetime in which the product of its distance from the center of the singularity and the force of gravity becomes negative, further turning into a repulsive force that instead of pulling matter, pushes it. In the region of spacetime beyond this singularity point, the gravity of the black hole repels both matter and light away from itself. Knowing this, I find it difficult to ignore the similarities between the inversion of light rays exiting the nodal point of an eye and the reversal of the basic properties of our universe after exiting the singularity point of a black hole.
After extensive research of my own, I have come to the conclusion that one of the few things in existence known to man that can direct light into a single point similar to the way the pupil of an eye and a black hole does, is a man-made camera. I also find it ironic how cameras use this method of function to effectively capture moments in time.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Back to black holes. Hypothetically, if you could fall into a black hole and survive, time relative to you would slow down and the light being pulled in would be pulled in faster than it can escape, further leading to a huge build up of photons (light particles) and the feeling you are surrounded by immense brightness (despite the common misconception that a black hole only contains darkness). With this in mind AND the many similar reports in existence of 'near death experiences' involving "the surrounding of immense light", I find it difficult to ignore the relativity of the two.
Again, hypothetically, if you could watch a person fall into a black hole and survive, they would become isolated from the rest of space and time as you know it, and effectively, disappear from the universe that you exist in. For you, this moment will be almost instantaneous. However, for them, the duration of this event could be infinitely long. With all these similarities in mind, maybe its possible that when we watch someone die, their death to us appears almost instantaneous. But to them, that sudden surge of neural activity could create conditions influentially similar to that of a black hole, further influencing their perception of time.
Einsteins theory clearly states that anything of mass could never reach the speed of light. But physicists state that despite an electron having mass and a photon having no mass, electricity travels the same exact speed through a wire that light travels through a vacuum.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
So maybe that final surge of electrical activity in the brain applies Einsteins Theory of Relativity to the final messages neurons send to synapses in the brain. In effect, time for the person dying could slow down to a point where they experience an everlasting "outer body experience" and a "surrounding of immense light".
There are still many near-death reports that quote the common saying "my life flashed before my eyes". Despite 'feeling' surrounded by immense brightness, there is no evidence to yet suggest that the electrical surge in brain activity could stop the brain from processing unimaginable amounts of visual memories that last infinitely long. My theory therefore still applies to anyone that dies with their eyes closed, as we do not need light rays to enter our eyes for us to see an image. With our eyes closed and only able to see darkness, we can still picture an image based on what we've already seen (memory).
In my hypothesis, the pupil of an eye is merely symbolic of how a black hole influences time. But time is an important factor here.
Take the fourth dimension for example. It is an abstract concept, obtained by taking the rules of our three-dimensional space and generalizing them into a space with one more dimension. This 'fourth' dimension primarily orientates time, but in a very complex manner. Upon entering a black hole, both light and matter (three-dimensional) become one dimensional (where subatomic particles are 'stretched' into a line) and are then infinitely condensed until they become a single point (the singularity point). What happens from here is speculative, but I again find it difficult to ignore the similarities between a three-dimensional galaxy theoretically originating from a singularity point (the Big Bang theory), and that same three-dimensional galaxy theoretically becoming a singularity point (following the eventual effects of a black hole).
Remember, black holes influence space and time as we know it. But to do this, black holes must contain a singularity point (which hypothetically, all black holes have). Knowing this, maybe it's possible that when a star large enough dies, it enters the fourth-dimension by manipulation of the first three dimensions. If so, maybe it's possible that when we die, our consciousness enters the fourth-dimension in the same manner.
Obviously this is all based on hypothesis and could therefore all be nonsense. But what if its not? Maybe there are even visual similarities between what scientists believe a black hole looks like and the pupil of an eye...
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Food for thought I guess...
I believe that the unexplained phenomenon of a sudden surge in neural brain activity and pupil dilation the instance before death reflects on the similarity between the collapse of a neutron star and the formation of a black hole. Yeah, sounds ridiculous right? However, let me explain myself before you rush to dismiss my idea.
To understand better, Einsteins simple Theory of Relativity needs to be understood. Einstein predicted that time relative to anything approaching the speed of light will in effect, slow down.
Knowing this, it is also important to note that light reflects from every area of an eye, but light does not bounce away from the pupil. Light rays are absorbed into the pupil where they become focused by the crystalline lens into something called the 'nodal point', where they then converge, flip over, and upon reaching the back of the retina are translated (signal transduction) into neural data the brain can understand. With a black hole, light acts in a very similar manner. Light rays do not bounce off. They are sucked into the inner horizon where they are then infinitely crushed and condensed into a single point (the singularity point).
It is still unknown where anything that enters a black hole goes. But it is theorized that everything is infinitely condensed into a single point (the singularity). Using Roy Kerrs mathematical equations regarding spinning black holes as a reference, a man named John Gribbon (PhD in Astrophysics) states that, as anything passes through the singularity, it enters a region of spacetime in which the product of its distance from the center of the singularity and the force of gravity becomes negative, further turning into a repulsive force that instead of pulling matter, pushes it. In the region of spacetime beyond this singularity point, the gravity of the black hole repels both matter and light away from itself. Knowing this, I find it difficult to ignore the similarities between the inversion of light rays exiting the nodal point of an eye and the reversal of the basic properties of our universe after exiting the singularity point of a black hole.
After extensive research of my own, I have come to the conclusion that one of the few things in existence known to man that can direct light into a single point similar to the way the pupil of an eye and a black hole does, is a man-made camera. I also find it ironic how cameras use this method of function to effectively capture moments in time.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Back to black holes. Hypothetically, if you could fall into a black hole and survive, time relative to you would slow down and the light being pulled in would be pulled in faster than it can escape, further leading to a huge build up of photons (light particles) and the feeling you are surrounded by immense brightness (despite the common misconception that a black hole only contains darkness). With this in mind AND the many similar reports in existence of 'near death experiences' involving "the surrounding of immense light", I find it difficult to ignore the relativity of the two.
Again, hypothetically, if you could watch a person fall into a black hole and survive, they would become isolated from the rest of space and time as you know it, and effectively, disappear from the universe that you exist in. For you, this moment will be almost instantaneous. However, for them, the duration of this event could be infinitely long. With all these similarities in mind, maybe its possible that when we watch someone die, their death to us appears almost instantaneous. But to them, that sudden surge of neural activity could create conditions influentially similar to that of a black hole, further influencing their perception of time.
Einsteins theory clearly states that anything of mass could never reach the speed of light. But physicists state that despite an electron having mass and a photon having no mass, electricity travels the same exact speed through a wire that light travels through a vacuum.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
So maybe that final surge of electrical activity in the brain applies Einsteins Theory of Relativity to the final messages neurons send to synapses in the brain. In effect, time for the person dying could slow down to a point where they experience an everlasting "outer body experience" and a "surrounding of immense light".
There are still many near-death reports that quote the common saying "my life flashed before my eyes". Despite 'feeling' surrounded by immense brightness, there is no evidence to yet suggest that the electrical surge in brain activity could stop the brain from processing unimaginable amounts of visual memories that last infinitely long. My theory therefore still applies to anyone that dies with their eyes closed, as we do not need light rays to enter our eyes for us to see an image. With our eyes closed and only able to see darkness, we can still picture an image based on what we've already seen (memory).
In my hypothesis, the pupil of an eye is merely symbolic of how a black hole influences time. But time is an important factor here.
Take the fourth dimension for example. It is an abstract concept, obtained by taking the rules of our three-dimensional space and generalizing them into a space with one more dimension. This 'fourth' dimension primarily orientates time, but in a very complex manner. Upon entering a black hole, both light and matter (three-dimensional) become one dimensional (where subatomic particles are 'stretched' into a line) and are then infinitely condensed until they become a single point (the singularity point). What happens from here is speculative, but I again find it difficult to ignore the similarities between a three-dimensional galaxy theoretically originating from a singularity point (the Big Bang theory), and that same three-dimensional galaxy theoretically becoming a singularity point (following the eventual effects of a black hole).
Remember, black holes influence space and time as we know it. But to do this, black holes must contain a singularity point (which hypothetically, all black holes have). Knowing this, maybe it's possible that when a star large enough dies, it enters the fourth-dimension by manipulation of the first three dimensions. If so, maybe it's possible that when we die, our consciousness enters the fourth-dimension in the same manner.
Obviously this is all based on hypothesis and could therefore all be nonsense. But what if its not? Maybe there are even visual similarities between what scientists believe a black hole looks like and the pupil of an eye...
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Food for thought I guess...
The following 1 user thanked iTsunami for this useful post:
TTGxINF4MOUS (06-30-2011)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 294
Reputation Power: 15
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 294
Reputation Power: 15
i didnt understand anything after the first word....
- 5useful
- 3not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201113Year Member
Posts: 435
Reputation Power: 20
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201113Year Member
Posts: 435
Reputation Power: 20
Ordinary_FanGurl wrote i didnt understand anything after the first word....
Then maybe you shouldnt post on here if you have a reading comprehension level below average....
- 6useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 294
Reputation Power: 15
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 294
Reputation Power: 15
iTsunami wrotehehehe your soooo funnyOrdinary_FanGurl wrote i didnt understand anything after the first word....
Then maybe you shouldnt post on here if you have a reading comprehension level below average....
- 0useful
- 3not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 31, 201113Year Member
Posts: 71
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 31, 201113Year Member
Posts: 71
Reputation Power: 2
You sir...have opened my mind even more than it is right now...and it was pretty open
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 509
Reputation Power: 24
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 509
Reputation Power: 24
Thats a cool though, always wondered about somthing like that
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 54
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,255
Reputation Power: 54
very random topic i gheuss but OK
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 200915Year Member
Posts: 97
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 200915Year Member
Posts: 97
Reputation Power: 3
i have thought this, maybee not this exact theory but i always thought when we died it was like an out of body experience, good post man
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,863
Reputation Power: 78
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,863
Reputation Power: 78
Ordinary_FanGurl wrote i didnt understand anything after the first word....
Aha Me To I Started Reading It And I Was Like WTF is This
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,754
Reputation Power: 76
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,754
Reputation Power: 76
iTsunami wroteHaha omg ordinary_fangirl you just got owned hahaOrdinary_FanGurl wrote i didnt understand anything after the first word....
Then maybe you shouldnt post on here if you have a reading comprehension level below average....
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.