PUDDING_ON_DECK wrote Call of duty is better it's just way better.Nuff said.

Explain how. Everyone here so far has a valid reason for Battlefield being better, then you show up...

i think cods a better game but if you could have private matches in battlefeild that would be way better

aidang2013 wrote i think cods a better game but if you could have private matches in battlefeild that would be way better

yea. that bothers me. but how is CoD better.

The feud between Call of Duty Fanboys and Battlefield fan boys is nothing but a bunch of excuses to hate on yet another series, and the people who support it, however in my opinion Battlefield has the better physics engine with the collapsible buildings, explosive reaction, and the fabled "Bullet flight path" however the movement is very forced and awkward, It's almost as though you're having a violent twitch rather then moving. Call of Duty has a much smoother movement engine, but lacks the large scale maps and detailed physics engine of Battlefield, however with the rumor going around that Modern Warfare 3 will have collapsible buildings, either Franchise could take this years big FPS profit.

Ambicidal wrote

iCamp wrote I have played Battlefield before and i have played Call of Duty before.

I like Call of Duty more. It's much easier and more fun.

Battlefield is confusing and annoying.

And yes, i have seen footage of Battlefield 3. The graphics are amazing.

It is hard at first but i bought Bad Company 2 a week ago and its all i can play. Also i bought i few more battlefield games ( im a veteran rank 8)

It's confusing and annoying because you don't know how to play. Not saying your bad because of that, but, Call of Duty players aren't going to be good at BF instantly, watch this video, if you still have a BF game, dust it off and try playing it again, this time, listening to what PixelEnemy says. it may be hard to get used to, but when you do, its REALLY FUN.

Ambicidal wrote

iCamp wrote I have played Battlefield before and i have played Call of Duty before.

I like Call of Duty more. It's much easier and more fun.

Battlefield is confusing and annoying.

And yes, i have seen footage of Battlefield 3. The graphics are amazing.

It is hard at first but i bought Bad Company 2 a week ago and its all i can play. Also i bought i few more battlefield games ( im a veteran rank 8)

It's confusing and annoying because you don't know how to play. Not saying your bad because of that, but, Call of Duty players aren't going to be good at BF instantly, watch this video, if you still have a BF game, dust it off and try playing it again, this time, listening to what PixelEnemy says. it may be hard to get used to, but when you do, its REALLY FUN.

Perhaps wrote The feud between Call of Duty Fanboys and Battlefield fan boys is nothing but a bunch of excuses to hate on yet another series, and the people who support it, however in my opinion Battlefield has the better physics engine with the collapsible buildings, explosive reaction, and the fabled "Bullet flight path" however the movement is very forced and awkward, It's almost as though you're having a violent twitch rather then moving. Call of Duty has a much smoother movement engine, but lacks the large scale maps and detailed physics engine of Battlefield, however with the rumor going around that Modern Warfare 3 will have collapsible buildings, either Franchise could take this years big FPS profit.

BTW thats scripted destruction. not actual destructible environment.

PUDDING_ON_DECK wrote Call of duty is better it's just way better.Nuff said.

Your'e probably just some MLG tryhard who calls BULLSHIT!!!! on every death, so I bid to you; Battlefield is better. Nuff said..........

M4GxDIESEL wrote

PUDDING_ON_DECK wrote Call of duty is better it's just way better.Nuff said.

Your'e probably just some MLG tryhard who calls BULLSHIT!!!! on every death, so I bid to you; Battlefield is better. Nuff said..........

#Winning 8)

PUDDING_ON_DECK wrote Call of duty is better it's just way better.Nuff said.

Your funny...........