ChainedBaKeR184 wrote

PUDDING_ON_DECK wrote Call of duty is better it's just way better.Nuff said.

Your funny...........

I know right. I'm tryin to have an honest argument here and this guy screws it up. Lame.

Ambicidal wrote

ChainedBaKeR184 wrote

PUDDING_ON_DECK wrote Call of duty is better it's just way better.Nuff said.

Your funny...........

I know right. I'm tryin to have an honest argument here and this guy screws it up. Lame.

Wait me or the other guy?

NeuLiot wrote What I think of cod is that it's going to be full of hackers after a few months after Mw3 Release. battlefield however has not many hackers out there because the game is un hackable unless you are a really experienced hacker

the game is not unhackable is just the hackes dont care for it as you see the cod games has it own section on ttg for modding/hacks/glitches and other stuff but battlefield just have the battlefield series but which one better well to me both games are better at different points (P.S)also i would not consider Black ops to be hackable

PUDDING_ON_DECK wrote Call of duty is better it's just way better.Nuff said.

Please justify your point. Don't be an arse.

aidang2013 wrote i think cods a better game but if you could have private matches in battlefeild that would be way better

you can have private matches O_o

I like Cod just as much as i do battlefield. (except black ops, black ops is not that good)
The reason being is that if i feel like running gunning arcade mayhem, ill play cod. but if i wanna kick back relax and have some good old tactical gameplay, ill play battlefield. But..they both get equally annoying sometimes.

Call of Duty is more for entertainment. Battlefield is a more realistic experience.

Call of Duty
Pros: Faster paced gaming, more friends play, wider selection of guns and gametypes.
Cons: 3arc/IW will patch/nerf weapons and even something like QS, small maps (compared to BF), killstreaks (a con because it takes away from what little realism is in the game).

Battlefield
Pros: A more realistic gameplay, larger maps, for computer really big teams, there is not a huge difference between the power of the guns (people dont use ONE gun like AK74u or FAMAS)
Cons: Smaller gamming community for consoles, less weapons and attachments, most people are medics.

Over all I think that Battlefield is more fun to play in general, but if I want a fast paced game and kill more than 20 people in the average game then I would play COD.

I play both but CoD is always the same
Battlefield always adds new things and is more fun

Halo is better than both of them.

#Winning

-Bungie wrote Halo is better than both of them.

#Winning

Halo is an amazing series, and they always deliver great gameplay, however its just not my type of game. But still, its great.