-Night- wrote

deceptivx wrote

-Night- wrote It has a good focal.
Why is their no lighting going onto him, just on him?
Also the right side is too dark.
Very good depth.
I'm not liking the text.

There doesn't need to be "lighting going onto him" all the time.

I meant a light source.
So does the light just appear onto him?

Yeah it does. He's a magical brumak.

Not trying to be defensive but you dont need to edit the whole signature to make it bright to show this is the light source, One side of the brumak is lit up, pretty explanatory.

I think that it is pretty good, 8\10.

-Agitator- wrote Not trying to be defensive but you dont need to edit the whole signature to make it bright to show this is the light source, One side of the brumak is lit up, pretty explanatory.

Light casts a stream, kind of like a spot light.
It just doesn't appear on one side?

-Night- wrote

deceptivx wrote

-Night- wrote It has a good focal.
Why is their no lighting going onto him, just on him?
Also the right side is too dark.
Very good depth.
I'm not liking the text.

There doesn't need to be "lighting going onto him" all the time.

I meant a light source.
So does the light just appear onto him?

the light source is fine, it only took a few layers?
it was done nicely he made the light source and made it the focal in both which is fine, lol
nice work man in the future if I thank your topic its cause I'm to lazy to say great work no complaints.

Black and white looks sick man good job

In the image what else can the light source possibly illuminate

Thanks for all the comments guys.

And yeah the light area was just a couple white brushes. This sig is a lot simpler than it looks. Agitator can confirm that.

That looks really good! I love the black and white. 8/10

.mythiclich much very you Thank