You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Call of Duty 5 might have the M4 in it? (PLease Read. It...)
Posted:
Call of Duty 5 might have the M4 in it? (PLease Read. It...)Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 27, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,552
Reputation Power: 157
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 27, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,552
Reputation Power: 157
Okay. So you know how a Call of Duty name gets a number right? Call of Duty 2 was WWII and Cod 4 (I know i left out 3. Have no idea what that was about ) Well the new Call of Duty that comes out will be in Vietnam. By Treyarch. Well. I watched Ultimate Weapons on the Military Channel they talk about the M4. Well. The war of Veitnam was from 1959-1975. And in the 1960's was when the M4 came out. Also known as the M4 Carbine in Cod4 and M4A1 in MW2. So. This could be the 3rd game that has the M4. It was sort of overpowered in COD4. Noobs used it. And in MW2 it was easy to get kills with it by camping (Not me. I used it well. ). So. Treyarch making it in the Vietnam war during the time when the M4 was made (It was used in the Vietnam war so it should be in there.) Although we don't know yet and there is no confirmations at all because it is just being started on we will wait and see. I just thought i post this. And because i am very bored. Enjoy!
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 17, 200915Year Member
Posts: 2,281
Reputation Power: 127
yeah still vietnam isnt 100% definate .. but i think it will be . I think a m4 would make it bette r. because then tell have to make more assault riffles .which i think it will make it better
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 200915Year Member
Posts: 1,766
Reputation Power: 134
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 200915Year Member
Posts: 1,766
Reputation Power: 134
Well ok but i dont think this is a good way from it i think they will stick with ww2 thats what tryarc make best
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 27, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,552
Reputation Power: 157
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 27, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,552
Reputation Power: 157
livodazza wrote Well ok but i dont think this is a good way from it i think they will stick with ww2 thats what tryarc make best
Well what else can they do? They can't make another WWII game. Then they would loose sales like that! They are moving close and close to MW. And then they would stop when they hit to the time of the Gulf War. Because that is IW's terf! But they even said in IGN's site they are working in vietnam.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 17, 200915Year Member
Posts: 2,281
Reputation Power: 127
TTG_Material wrotelivodazza wrote Well ok but i dont think this is a good way from it i think they will stick with ww2 thats what tryarc make best
Well what else can they do? They can't make another WWII game. Then they would loose sales like that! They are moving close and close to MW. And then they would stop when they hit to the time of the Gulf War. Because that is IW's terf! But they even said in IGN's site they are working in vietnam.
id like to see them make a game with kind of modern weapons but with the darkness like cod 5 . I think it make the campaign feel like a movie and fells more epic .. the mw2 campaign was fun but not really compelling .. do ya get me??
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 27, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,552
Reputation Power: 157
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 27, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,552
Reputation Power: 157
TTG_JoE_oH wroteTTG_Material wrotelivodazza wrote Well ok but i dont think this is a good way from it i think they will stick with ww2 thats what tryarc make best
Well what else can they do? They can't make another WWII game. Then they would loose sales like that! They are moving close and close to MW. And then they would stop when they hit to the time of the Gulf War. Because that is IW's terf! But they even said in IGN's site they are working in vietnam.
id like to see them make a game with kind of modern weapons but with the darkness like cod 5 . I think it make the campaign feel like a movie and fells more epic .. the mw2 campaign was fun but not really compelling .. do ya get me??
I agree with you Joe. MW1's campiagn was so much better. But MW2 sucked at it. Too much drama scenes in it. And COD5 made a really EP1C campiagn. Everything was good and nothing was too stupid. But Treyarch is now entering the modern times. And that will get them some good sales. I would like to see the M4 or M7.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 200915Year Member
Posts: 97
Reputation Power: 7
its probably the AR- 15 (which is the gun that the M4 was made from)
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 200915Year Member
Posts: 809
Reputation Power: 72
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 200915Year Member
Posts: 809
Reputation Power: 72
I think that treyarch could make another ww2 game. World at War was the best ww2 shooter i have played since cod2. W@W had story that was cinematic and engaging. WW2 cover so mutch time and space there are near imfinate story to be told.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 25, 200915Year Member
Posts: 997
Reputation Power: 39
Cool.. Also.. If treyarch made another WW2 game i wouldn't buy it.. In my own opinion i think CoD 5 sucked
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 200915Year Member
Posts: 857
Reputation Power: 59
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 200915Year Member
Posts: 857
Reputation Power: 59
They are spending too much time on WW2 I think they should move on.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.