LinkinPark wrote

MacMiller wrote The focal point is poorly defined
The Lighting is.. Oh wait there is none
The Depth is.. again there is none
And there is no flow

you need to work

I have two separate layers that I soft brushed for lighting. Cant you see the top right corner is bright and the left is dark?

Theres plenty of smudging for depth.

And there doesn't always have to be flow. This one I went for texture.

Incorrect the smudging is done way to close to each other making it hard to create depth

this is what your crappy signature should look like:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

btw sorry for being harsh, i hate it when people try to outsmart me, specially people that are new to signature making

MacMiller wrote

LinkinPark wrote

MacMiller wrote The focal point is poorly defined
The Lighting is.. Oh wait there is none
The Depth is.. again there is none
And there is no flow

you need to work

I have two separate layers that I soft brushed for lighting. Cant you see the top right corner is bright and the left is dark?

Theres plenty of smudging for depth.

And there doesn't always have to be flow. This one I went for texture.

Incorrect the smudging is done way to close to each other making it hard to create depth

this is what your crappy signature should look like:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

btw sorry for being harsh, i hate it when people try to outsmart me, specially people that are new to signature making

Crappy signature? I haven't seen you post sh*t. All you do is run around critisizing everything. And I wasn't trying to outsmart you, I was pointing out the obvious. And I'm not new to signature making, I was trying out a new style.





I think we both know which one looks better.

LinkinPark wrote

MacMiller wrote

LinkinPark wrote

MacMiller wrote The focal point is poorly defined
The Lighting is.. Oh wait there is none
The Depth is.. again there is none
And there is no flow

you need to work

I have two separate layers that I soft brushed for lighting. Cant you see the top right corner is bright and the left is dark?

Theres plenty of smudging for depth.

And there doesn't always have to be flow. This one I went for texture.

Incorrect the smudging is done way to close to each other making it hard to create depth

this is what your crappy signature should look like:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

btw sorry for being harsh, i hate it when people try to outsmart me, specially people that are new to signature making

Crappy signature? I haven't seen you post sh*t. All you do is run around critisizing everything. And I wasn't trying to outsmart you, I was pointing out the obvious. And I'm not new to signature making, I was trying out a new style.

Click to View Content

Yours.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Mine.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

I think we both know which one looks better.

my signatures:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

and thats not even my best

To be honest, none of that is good enough for you to go around critisizing everything. What you do is flame more than CnC.

v1 id the best 7/10

LinkinPark wrote To be honest, none of that is good enough for you to go around critisizing everything. What you do is flame more than CnC.

actually they are good enough, does are not my best.. Also its not flaming cause when the board comes to the point where YOUR work is considered a ten i worry, so i start being harsh so people change.

MacMiller wrote

LinkinPark wrote To be honest, none of that is good enough for you to go around critisizing everything. What you do is flame more than CnC.

actually they are good enough, does are not my best.. Also its not flaming cause when the board comes to the point where YOUR work is considered a ten i worry, so i start being harsh so people change.

I'm actually not offended by that. My work is considered really good considered to some of the other sh*t on here. The kids here are mostly giving anything a 10 to post boost.

And why do you keep saying This isnt my best this isnt my best, just post your best sig..