thats stupid, its encouraging people to play the game how they shouldn't, you cant run into the middle of the battle, and expect to kill people with a sniper, you need to sit back, and pick people of gradually.

It Looks Crap Anyway.

Aqhuaa wrote thats stupid, its encouraging people to play the game how they shouldn't, you cant run into the middle of the battle, and expect to kill people with a sniper, you need to sit back, and pick people of gradually.

If you also noticed he sat still for him.. So like if your running he is going to have to lead the bullet and everything. By that time he will have bullets flying towards him. So even if they do keep this in I wouldn't care at all.

It's alpha gameplay everyone. Calm down. They will be having a day one update to fix that if it isn't fixed before release.

ShadyTillDeath wrote Even if they could quickscopee.. It looks like it takes 2 shots if not a headshot so if you let someone run up to you while you have a fully automatic weapon and shoot you two times with a sniper you are garbage...NUFF SAID.!!! Sure its very much like COD if you keep it in the game but think about it... BF needs more fun added to it so people can stop complaining that its boring. I think I have way more fun on BF, pretty much all day I play serious but when I want to mess around I strap C4 to cars and blow up enemy tanks. Having fun and still helping my team. Quickscoping isnt a bad idea because snipers cant just run through the middle of a map and survive. Do that and your fcked.!

Depends on the sniper too. I'm very sure that they will be 1 shot kill snipers.

-Frostbite-

i wud laugh if there was a battlefield 3 quick scope montage

TClobby_v1 wrote i wud laugh if there was a battlefield 3 quick scope montage

you ever seen bc2 quickscope montage? there are tons of them. most of them like me use an sv-98 acog.