You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Drake Signature
Posted:
Drake SignaturePosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 68
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 68
Reputation Power: 2
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,017
Reputation Power: 252
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,017
Reputation Power: 252
lol look at my big brother. well done sam.
OT: c4ds blend well and add nice depth. lighting is nice as well.
OT: c4ds blend well and add nice depth. lighting is nice as well.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 05, 201113Year Member
Posts: 179
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 05, 201113Year Member
Posts: 179
Reputation Power: 10
Looks Good Brotha.
I'm not a fan of IRL Forum Tags.
But this is an exception.
I Just don't see alot of flow I would've liked to have seen.
8/10
I'm not a fan of IRL Forum Tags.
But this is an exception.
I Just don't see alot of flow I would've liked to have seen.
8/10
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,386
Reputation Power: 55
SWAG ILL GIVE YOU 8/10
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,365
Reputation Power: 64
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,365
Reputation Power: 64
I'd give it a 7/10. Its ok, but it doesnt seem like a lot has been done, just some c4ds as a background, soft brush light source, and soft brush eraser in one spot to blend. There is nothing in-front of the render to help it blend and add to the sig.
Red: Its very obvious that you used a soft eraser there to attempt to blend. I would try to make it more subtle.
Green: Green is the flow of the sig, which it looks like you matched fairly well with the c4ds.
Blue: The lighting on the render doesnt match the light source of the sig. The circled area should be darker.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Red: Its very obvious that you used a soft eraser there to attempt to blend. I would try to make it more subtle.
Green: Green is the flow of the sig, which it looks like you matched fairly well with the c4ds.
Blue: The lighting on the render doesnt match the light source of the sig. The circled area should be darker.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,068
Reputation Power: 149
Status: Offline
Joined: May 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,068
Reputation Power: 149
it looks really sleek dude. nice 8/10
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 68
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 68
Reputation Power: 2
Greynade wrote I'd give it a 7/10. Its ok, but it doesnt seem like a lot has been done, just some c4ds as a background, soft brush light source, and soft brush eraser in one spot to blend. There is nothing in-front of the render to help it blend and add to the sig.
Red: Its very obvious that you used a soft eraser there to attempt to blend. I would try to make it more subtle.
Green: Green is the flow of the sig, which it looks like you matched fairly well with the c4ds.
Blue: The lighting on the render doesnt match the light source of the sig. The circled area should be darker.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
thanks for the actual feedback bud. appreciated a ton!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,648
Reputation Power: 149
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,648
Reputation Power: 149
That picture of him is used SO many times. It's getting too old. Get a new picture of him then it will look good. 8)
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 201113Year Member
Posts: 626
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 201113Year Member
Posts: 626
Reputation Power: 31
Greynade wrote I'd give it a 7/10. Its ok, but it doesnt seem like a lot has been done, just some c4ds as a background, soft brush light source, and soft brush eraser in one spot to blend. There is nothing in-front of the render to help it blend and add to the sig.
Red: Its very obvious that you used a soft eraser there to attempt to blend. I would try to make it more subtle.
Green: Green is the flow of the sig, which it looks like you matched fairly well with the c4ds.
Blue: The lighting on the render doesnt match the light source of the sig. The circled area should be darker.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Thats a really good showing of whats wrong
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 68
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 68
Reputation Power: 2
-OrangeJuice wroteGreynade wrote I'd give it a 7/10. Its ok, but it doesnt seem like a lot has been done, just some c4ds as a background, soft brush light source, and soft brush eraser in one spot to blend. There is nothing in-front of the render to help it blend and add to the sig.
Red: Its very obvious that you used a soft eraser there to attempt to blend. I would try to make it more subtle.
Green: Green is the flow of the sig, which it looks like you matched fairly well with the c4ds.
Blue: The lighting on the render doesnt match the light source of the sig. The circled area should be darker.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Thats a really good showing of whats wrong
yet you probably dont have any idea what hes even saying. your just boosting your post count.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.