I like the colors. But theres not depth or render blending. Also I don't see any lighting, could use some work.

KTM-MX wrote Weren't you just on my **** because you didn't like my lighting? >.>

Looks like a lot of junk going on in the back, and nothing in the front, so there's really no depth.

Effects look really LQ.

6/10

Probably because it was designed to be like that?

1. dont ever go to LSU, there graduation rate is like 43%.
2. I hate LSU, but im a Oregon fan so its awkward.
3. On the sig, its really lacking depth. The smudging around him looks good, but then here:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

it really throws it off.

Just my opinion.

NsN wrote

KTM-MX wrote Weren't you just on my **** because you didn't like my lighting? >.>

Looks like a lot of junk going on in the back, and nothing in the front, so there's really no depth.

Effects look really LQ.

6/10

Probably because it was designed to be like that?

What's the point for a forum sig to be designed like that? The main concept of a forum sig is to incorporate the best lighting, depth, blending, focal, atmosphere, and whatever else you can come up with that I forgot.

If it was designed to be "clean/simple" or whatever, then I'm sorry, but I really don't believe that a clean or simple sig is really a tag, it's just an excuse not to put time in to your work.

Kreative wrote 1. dont ever go to LSU, there graduation rate is like 43%.
2. I hate LSU, but im a Oregon fan so its awkward.
3. On the sig, its really lacking depth. The smudging around him looks good, but then here:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

it really throws it off.

Just my opinion.

Yea I was going to change that but I forgot to save the psd.

KTM-MX wrote

NsN wrote

KTM-MX wrote Weren't you just on my **** because you didn't like my lighting? >.>

Looks like a lot of junk going on in the back, and nothing in the front, so there's really no depth.

Effects look really LQ.

6/10

Probably because it was designed to be like that?

What's the point for a forum sig to be designed like that? The main concept of a forum sig is to incorporate the best lighting, depth, blending, focal, atmosphere, and whatever else you can come up with that I forgot.

If it was designed to be "clean/simple" or whatever, then I'm sorry, but I really don't believe that a clean or simple sig is really a tag, it's just an excuse not to put time in to your work.

It's my 3rd sig of the day I rushed it and I didn't have my contacts in when I did this so I was practically blind.

looks sooo godd man Holy Cruudd

Klimax wrote

KTM-MX wrote

NsN wrote

KTM-MX wrote Weren't you just on my **** because you didn't like my lighting? >.>

Looks like a lot of junk going on in the back, and nothing in the front, so there's really no depth.

Effects look really LQ.

6/10

Probably because it was designed to be like that?

What's the point for a forum sig to be designed like that? The main concept of a forum sig is to incorporate the best lighting, depth, blending, focal, atmosphere, and whatever else you can come up with that I forgot.

If it was designed to be "clean/simple" or whatever, then I'm sorry, but I really don't believe that a clean or simple sig is really a tag, it's just an excuse not to put time in to your work.

It's my 3rd sig of the day I rushed it and I didn't have my contacts in when I did this so I was practically blind.

That's no excuse, you should be trying 100% in each tag you make. You could've decided to not make a 3rd sig if you didn't think it would be quality, you could've held off until you knew you COULD produce something of higher quality, and you also could've ran and got your contacts.

KTM-MX wrote

Klimax wrote

KTM-MX wrote

NsN wrote

KTM-MX wrote Weren't you just on my **** because you didn't like my lighting? >.>

Looks like a lot of junk going on in the back, and nothing in the front, so there's really no depth.

Effects look really LQ.

6/10

Probably because it was designed to be like that?

What's the point for a forum sig to be designed like that? The main concept of a forum sig is to incorporate the best lighting, depth, blending, focal, atmosphere, and whatever else you can come up with that I forgot.

If it was designed to be "clean/simple" or whatever, then I'm sorry, but I really don't believe that a clean or simple sig is really a tag, it's just an excuse not to put time in to your work.

It's my 3rd sig of the day I rushed it and I didn't have my contacts in when I did this so I was practically blind.

That's no excuse, you should be trying 100% in each tag you make. You could've decided to not make a 3rd sig if you didn't think it would be quality, you could've held off until you knew you COULD produce something of higher quality, and you also could've ran and got your contacts.

Im not going to put my contacts in right after I took them out. Then I would have to take them right back out. So just stfu and quit flaming. Your sig had lots wrong with it also. So just gtfo little kid.

Very nice!

I think you just put a little too much smoke around him.