So I decided to involve myself in this mainly because I was tired of seeing people crying about the beta. To anyone that says that Battlefield 3 is bad here's the stats about the beta and full game.

Battlefield 3 beta:
1.)isn't running in 1080i, it's currently in 720p
2.)run's at 30 Fps
3.)isn't a beta, it's an alpha with online capabilities(thus some of the bugs)
4.)IT's a "Beta", not a single beta is perfect

Okay now the facts on MW3:
1.)1080i, but not full HD.
2.)Run's at 60 Fps
3.)It's Beta was a paid non public event.
4.)Is extremely over hyped MW2 add-on(doesn't mean it's bad)

Now the comparisons:

BF3's 30 Fps to MW3's 60:
To anyone that thinks this is a difference they are mistaken. Most games that claim they are 60 Fps actually drop frames a lot more then games that are 30. So in fact MW3 is only going to be an average of 30-40 Fps. Now 60 to 30 Fps is literally 1/60th of a second difference, so if something happens in BF3 it would have happened one frame sooner in MW3, which the human eye can't distinguish.

Full HD(BF3) VS. 1080i(Non Full HD) MW3

Because of the process in which they make the game MW3 won't be full HD, the game is built in a lower format then ported over to HD by a special process. Battlefield 3 is built and designed in 1080p, and will be ported over to Full HD in the retail game As well.

Finally:

I'm no fan boy of either I play both a great bit, and am good at both (Ranked #5 in my state in black ops, #8 MW2, #3 Cod4.) I play CoD much more then BF3 but honestly this game is by far more balanced, and better looking then cod will ever be, the movement system is extremely realistic. The number one reason BF3 will be better then CoD, you can see your legs when you look down at the ground.

*NO FLAMING, THIS IS FOR INTELLIGENT CONVERSATION ONLY!*