DeadlyDasher wrote

ArcadeShow wrote

Khaos-Modz wrote

fwong42 wrote mw3 runs 480 and fps drop to like 30 and 20 when you run and shoot and stuff where bf stays at 30fps, btw they can make it 60 fps but it runs fine at 30 so why fix whats not broken

Its Called An Improvement, Doesnt have anything to do with it being broken

They don't increase the FPS because if they did the game would run on 30 anyways, because of all the stuff going on, unlike MW3 there's way more going on.

More things to do in game = a better game?
Lol thats some **** logic. I know plenty of games that have a lot of stuff to do in them and people still barely liked it. One example is Frontline Fuels of War.

*NO FLAMING, THIS IS FOR INTELLIGENT CONVERSATION ONLY!*

Think you might want to review that suggestion.

Lets be entirely honest.. The game you choose to play is entirely upto you. I am sure they will both be excellent games, but why the hate between people who buy Call of Duty and people who buy Battlefield? It's unnecessary and immature. If you don't want to buy BF3, then don't, but why come onto a tech forum and be the keyboard warrior about it?

I personally with get Battlefield this year, not because Call of Duty is bad, but because I fancy a chance from Call of Duty.

-Carbonix- wrote MW3 is the same as other CoDs in the fact that IT DOES NOT DROP FRAMES! It is constant 60fps unless you run through smoke nades then it drops to 45ish, dumb kids here don't even know framerate means.

Nothing can run at a steady Frame rate, Proven countless times on every PC game every Invented, and on COD4, and MW2. Your argument is invalid, perhaps you need to learn about FPS.

Nice post! Now hopefully everyone looks at this..

Somalian wrote Lets be entirely honest.. The game you choose to play is entirely upto you. I am sure they will both be excellent games, but why the hate between people who buy Call of Duty and people who buy Battlefield? It's unnecessary and immature. If you don't want to buy BF3, then don't, but why come onto a tech forum and be the keyboard warrior about it?

I personally with get Battlefield this year, not because Call of Duty is bad, but because I fancy a chance from Call of Duty.

I'm not saying either is better then the other, the entire post was to put facts in the arguments because every fan-boy and there brother, are crying on here. So i decided to post the topic with the most information, and after you know all this you can cry with at least knowing the facts

its your opinion so doesnt matter what anyone else thinks

MrModder1337 wrote its your opinion so doesnt matter what anyone else thinks

"Facts" not opinions, should probably give it another read through if you think it's an opinion lad.

LikeBots wrote Nice post! Now hopefully everyone looks at this..

Thank's I hope this keeps going

ArcadeShow wrote

runforrest wrote MW3 will be 60fps constant, other wise they couldnt say it was a 60fps game and BF3 will be 30fps constant, mw3 would never drop as low as 20fps unless your xbox/ps3/PC is broken or someone hacks it and spams rpg's. BF3 might say 1080p however i doubt that the resolutution will be in 1920x1080 and even if it does manage that resolution, all the detail will be on low. MW3 will have the same graphics as any past cod game which are horrid and unrealistic.

Basically what im saying is you really should be getting a good PC to play battlefield and cod is made for consoles.

I have 12gb Ram gaming set up..I'm still a bigger fan of consoles. also it's not a constant 60 FPS, if you think it is you obviously don't know how FPS works.

"I have 12gb Ram gaming set up".. Yes because RAM is what plays the most important in role in keeping a stable 60 fps. /sarcasm. Idiot.

Call of duty does NOT run on 1080i or p

It runs at 565p which is up-scaled to 720p and 1080p.

-Frostbite-