-Frostbite- wrote Call of duty does NOT run on 1080i or p

It runs at 565p which is up-scaled to 720p and 1080p.

-Frostbite-

Thank
Kids are stupid sometimes thanks more clearing up

ArcadeShow wrote

runforrest wrote MW3 will be 60fps constant, other wise they couldnt say it was a 60fps game and BF3 will be 30fps constant, mw3 would never drop as low as 20fps unless your xbox/ps3/PC is broken or someone hacks it and spams rpg's. BF3 might say 1080p however i doubt that the resolutution will be in 1920x1080 and even if it does manage that resolution, all the detail will be on low. MW3 will have the same graphics as any past cod game which are horrid and unrealistic.

Basically what im saying is you really should be getting a good PC to play battlefield and cod is made for consoles.

I have 12gb Ram gaming set up..I'm still a bigger fan of consoles. also it's not a constant 60 FPS, if you think it is you obviously don't know how FPS works.

why are you a bigger fan of console? it makes no sense, a computer can do a million times as much as a console can, and the games are cheaper...

runforrest wrote

ArcadeShow wrote

runforrest wrote MW3 will be 60fps constant, other wise they couldnt say it was a 60fps game and BF3 will be 30fps constant, mw3 would never drop as low as 20fps unless your xbox/ps3/PC is broken or someone hacks it and spams rpg's. BF3 might say 1080p however i doubt that the resolutution will be in 1920x1080 and even if it does manage that resolution, all the detail will be on low. MW3 will have the same graphics as any past cod game which are horrid and unrealistic.

Basically what im saying is you really should be getting a good PC to play battlefield and cod is made for consoles.

Really cause PC games and Console games cost the exact same, last time I checked pc games that are multi platform cost the same, I.E cod, BF,halo, etc.

I have 12gb Ram gaming set up..I'm still a bigger fan of consoles. also it's not a constant 60 FPS, if you think it is you obviously don't know how FPS works.

why are you a bigger fan of console? it makes no sense, a computer can do a million times as much as a console can, and the games are cheaper...

Multi-platform games cost the same.

Digital wrote

ArcadeShow wrote

runforrest wrote MW3 will be 60fps constant, other wise they couldnt say it was a 60fps game and BF3 will be 30fps constant, mw3 would never drop as low as 20fps unless your xbox/ps3/PC is broken or someone hacks it and spams rpg's. BF3 might say 1080p however i doubt that the resolutution will be in 1920x1080 and even if it does manage that resolution, all the detail will be on low. MW3 will have the same graphics as any past cod game which are horrid and unrealistic.

Basically what im saying is you really should be getting a good PC to play battlefield and cod is made for consoles.

I have 12gb Ram gaming set up..I'm still a bigger fan of consoles. also it's not a constant 60 FPS, if you think it is you obviously don't know how FPS works.

"I have 12gb Ram gaming set up".. Yes because RAM is what plays the most important in role in keeping a stable 60 fps. /sarcasm. Idiot.

Didn't feel like going into vast amounts of detail about my computer notice "12gb ram gaming set up" key words "gaming set up" I don't have 12 gb's of ram and a dell intel family chip set. :facepalm:

-Carbonix- wrote MW3 is the same as other CoDs in the fact that IT DOES NOT DROP FRAMES! It is constant 60fps unless you run through smoke nades then it drops to 45ish, dumb kids here don't even know framerate means.

LOL the Fps of any game is always fluctuating,

CoD is 480p lol

-Kalasjnikov-

Kalasjnikov wrote CoD is 480p lol

-Kalasjnikov-

Actually cod is made in a lower graphic setting then ported up to render in higher quality. thus it's not true HD. if you're running it in 480p I'd suggest getting HDMI and a better television my good sir.

no trying to flame but mw3 runs at 480i

ArcadeShow wrote So I decided to involve myself in this mainly because I was tired of seeing people crying about the beta. To anyone that says that Battlefield 3 is bad here's the stats about the beta and full game.

Battlefield 3 beta:
1.)isn't running in 1080i, it's currently in 720p
2.)run's at 30 Fps
3.)isn't a beta, it's an alpha with online capabilities(thus some of the bugs)
4.)IT's a "Beta", not a single beta is perfect

Okay now the facts on MW3:
1.)1080i, but not full HD.
2.)Run's at 60 Fps
3.)It's Beta was a paid non public event.
4.)Is extremely over hyped MW2 add-on(doesn't mean it's bad)

Now the comparisons:

BF3's 30 Fps to MW3's 60:
To anyone that thinks this is a difference they are mistaken. Most games that claim they are 60 Fps actually drop frames a lot more then games that are 30. So in fact MW3 is only going to be an average of 30-40 Fps. Now 60 to 30 Fps is literally 1/60th of a second difference, so if something happens in BF3 it would have happened one frame sooner in MW3, which the human eye can't distinguish.

Full HD(BF3) VS. 1080i(Non Full HD) MW3

Because of the process in which they make the game MW3 won't be full HD, the game is built in a lower format then ported over to HD by a special process. Battlefield 3 is built and designed in 1080p, and will be ported over to Full HD in the retail game As well.

Finally:

I'm no fan boy of either I play both a great bit, and am good at both (Ranked #5 in my state in black ops, #8 MW2, #3 Cod4.) I play CoD much more then BF3 but honestly this game is by far more balanced, and better looking then cod will ever be, the movement system is extremely realistic. The number one reason BF3 will be better then CoD, you can see your legs when you look down at the ground.

*NO FLAMING, THIS IS FOR INTELLIGENT CONVERSATION ONLY!*

Personally I believe comparing either games is kinda of stupid because they both have different gameplay styles. It's all on which you prefer. I like both games and am excited to maybe own both of them in the future

Here is a short list of reasons why BF runs 30 fps on consoles
-There are vehicles
-Huge maps
-Great graphics
-Destruction of buildings

If you want battlefield to run on 60fps on console ( even tho you can't tell the difference ) You need to deduce all vehicles to 1 or none , Make the maps smaller , make the graphics worse and remove 90% of the destruction...
If that's done you get basically call of duty AND NO ONE WANTS THAT
So stop saying " MW3 RUNZ ON 60FPS HERP DERP " , NO ONE CARES

Also comparing CoD to BF is like comparing Fifa to Madden ...