I'm no fanboy but ON CONSOLES all CoDs run at 60 frames per second constantly, this is a proven fact, unless you throw some smoke grenades or have a horrible connection. Only game that didn't was Black Ops on the PS3 because Treyarch made a horrible port to the Playstation 3.

Obviously on a PC the framerate will be higher and drop more easily due to the fact of every PC having different hardware so no game is optimized for a particular PC.

DeadlyDasher wrote

Terrian123 wrote

DeadlyDasher wrote

ArcadeShow wrote So I decided to involve myself in this mainly because I was tired of seeing people crying about the beta. To anyone that says that Battlefield 3 is bad here's the stats about the beta and full game.

Battlefield 3 beta:
1.)isn't running in 1080i, it's currently in 720p
2.)run's at 30 Fps
3.)isn't a beta, it's an alpha with online capabilities(thus some of the bugs)
4.)IT's a "Beta", not a single beta is perfect

Okay now the facts on MW3:
1.)1080i, but not full HD.
2.)Run's at 60 Fps
3.)It's Beta was a paid non public event.
4.)Is extremely over hyped MW2 add-on(doesn't mean it's bad)

Now the comparisons:

BF3's 30 Fps to MW3's 60:
To anyone that thinks this is a difference they are mistaken. Most games that claim they are 60 Fps actually drop frames a lot more then games that are 30. So in fact MW3 is only going to be an average of 30-40 Fps. Now 60 to 30 Fps is literally 1/60th of a second difference, so if something happens in BF3 it would have happened one frame sooner in MW3, which the human eye can't distinguish.

Full HD(BF3) VS. 1080i(Non Full HD) MW3

Because of the process in which they make the game MW3 won't be full HD, the game is built in a lower format then ported over to HD by a special process. Battlefield 3 is built and designed in 1080p, and will be ported over to Full HD in the retail game As well.

Finally:

I'm no fan boy of either I play both a great bit, and am good at both (Ranked #5 in my state in black ops, #8 MW2, #3 Cod4.) I play CoD much more then BF3 but honestly this game is by far more balanced, and better looking then cod will ever be, the movement system is extremely realistic. The number one reason BF3 will be better then CoD, you can see your legs when you look down at the ground.

*NO FLAMING, THIS IS FOR INTELLIGENT CONVERSATION ONLY!*

Despite what you say, you still sound like a MW3 hater. And why should call of duty change a formula thats working.

He isn't saying that they need to change anything. He is just stating facts. As long as all the kiddies keep getting their mothers to buy the same game every year for them then of course they wont change anything.

Its pretty much the same every year. Copy and paste of COD4 with new maps.

Oh and do you know why people liked halo 2 way more then 3? Because bungie listened to people like you and changed the game way to much.

People like me? I never asked for any changes. I dont see what your point is or what you are getting at.

for all of you people complaining that BF3 runs at 30 FPS

I suggest you check out speeds topic
Forums/t=2259434/the-truth-behind...3-fps.html

This is way to complicated, but i like all of the arguements 8)

x_GrooMii_x wrote 4. It isnt a beta
5. ITS a beta...

Great load of sense that made...

next time quote the line...
4. It isn't a beta
5. ITS a "Beta"
the quotations represent a statement, meaning that everyone call's it a beta, learn English dialog before you post half witted comments please.

Sentence wrote This is way to complicated, but i like all of the arguements 8)

intellectual Conversation's

But then again, the BF3 dev team have actually gotten of their arse's to make a whole new game engine, whereas IW use the same engine they've been using since CoD: 2. Also, the lead development platform for Battlefield has always been and always will be for PC. Consoles are not up for Battlefield 3, console players should count them selves lucky to even get a version.

No I had a online mod where it showed me the FPS and it almost NEVER went below 60 the lowest I have seen it go is 59 and that was only for a split second

Derp wrote But then again, the BF3 dev team have actually gotten of their arse's to make a whole new game engine, whereas IW use the same engine they've been using since CoD: 2. Also, the lead development platform for Battlefield has always been and always will be for PC. Consoles are not up for Battlefield 3, console players should count them selves lucky to even get a version.

IW not making the multiplayer , sledgehammer is and even though its not a completely different engine they mad ALOT of modifacations to it so its basically a new engine in my eyes

TTG_BALOWNEE wrote

Derp wrote But then again, the BF3 dev team have actually gotten of their arse's to make a whole new game engine, whereas IW use the same engine they've been using since CoD: 2. Also, the lead development platform for Battlefield has always been and always will be for PC. Consoles are not up for Battlefield 3, console players should count them selves lucky to even get a version.

IW not making the multiplayer , sledgehammer is and even though its not a completely different engine they mad ALOT of modifacations to it so its basically a new engine in my eyes

They may add a little difference to the graphics a little, but their security hasn't been touched one bit. Every cod game gets hacked in the same way.