I want to start off my saying that so far I'm having a great time with the game. I've played a bit of campaign and I've done some of the coop missions. And of course I've played a bunch of multiplayer. I'm glad to see others enjoying the game and realizing everything DICE has done to improve it. But it saddens me to see people downgrading it simple because the servers are being tweaked or because they can't handle the tactical thinking and teamwork it takes to be an above average player in this game.

This is NOT Call of Duty. You can't run in guns blazing by yourself. This is a team game. I'm not saying that CoD letting you be a one man army is a bad thing at all. In fact that's one of the BEST things about the game. It's a completely different style than BF.

As for me I think BF3 is fantastic. Nothing is better than having a squad full of your buddies arm and mcom station and while you're defending it an enemy chopper starts to pepper you with a hail of bullets a missles. Then out of no where a friendly jet swoops in with a heat seeker and blows it up.

Of course, it has a few kinks here and there and it's not perfect at all. People keep bringing up all these flaws and then have something smart to say regarding how much "better" MW3 will be than BF3.

For those of you who think CoD is divine and holy without any flaws, let me jog your memory.

- Javelin glitch
- modded lobbies
- model shotguns before patch
- care package glitch
- deranking lobbies
- THE SERVERS WHEN THE GAME FIRST CAME OUT
- Lightweight, marathon, commando
- nuke boosters
- private match XP


With that said, don't go thinking I have something against CoD. I love BOTH games. They both have flaws and both are actually very different playing games.

Hopefully some of you share the same thoughts on the game. Just thought I'd throw my opinion out there.