Little crazy studying 9/11 for 2 years eh? Anyways the information you're providing takes 10 minutes of research, seriously. Honestly, the government did plan this attack, I am a part engineer, still studying. For one that pentagon attack is very true, where could that gigantic plane have gone? It surely wasn't inside the pentagon and it surely wasn't big enough to do it, the problem I see is this. I think the government is a little smarter to check these kinds of things, we are in an era of having things checked time and time again, making sure that a plan goes out accordingly, or else it isn't from our era at all. 2 things could have happened here,

A) These plans were studied and created maybe a decade ago, we needed our oil from the middle east, and we had a bunch of hippies going around protesting to not allow our soldiers to be shipped there. They planned this attack, and blamed these middle easterns for it, to gain support to go to war with the middle east.

B) This plan could have been purposely sabotaged for people like me to realize it. I mean I did say the government is smarter then what is being shown on the table, so why didn't they make it a perfect plan? To keep Americans thinking -.-

The attack on the pentagon did not make any sense at all, and sure it had its flaws, believe it or not, I still think the Government played a HUGE role in this attack.

The Twin Towers attack, well that was very odd. All signs point to having bombs planted there, rednecks can't point out that those were planted... Or where they? Maybe there weren't any bombs at all? Stories say that they could hear explosions before a plane hit, well the fact of the matter, is that it might not have been explosions. Merely the steel or these 6 air attack resistant Poles you mentioned ****-busted after 1 plane hit. Each plane hit the twin towers yes, but not in 10 seconds of each other. Temperatures were reaching more then 2k degrees in the building. How could steel just collapse? Truth is, it melted. Architectural plans have to be designed so that if one structure of the building fails, the other SHOULD be able to support it for a short period of times. Take an example for a deck of cards. If you say, build a house out of it, (Normal house with the triangle shaped points, etc) if one card collapses the whole structure collapses. If we added support to both sides and a lot of it, we could probably manage for it to not fall. However, if that is applied to building with very heavy materials, such as steel, it is a problem, all that weight involved in just holding the simple structure of 4 corners is dangerous. Wind is one of the most causes of buildings to collapse. Architects have to take into consideration wind dynamics, such as repelling the wind instead of hitting the towers and not bouncing back. If they are applied evenly the building can remain in shape and in place, if not applied evenly, the building could tilt, and it has happened. It may not seem like it at all, but all it takes is 1/10th of an inch of movement from a building, to have a broken piece of the structure. If this one structure fails, then more will eventually fail, and thats what happened with the towers. The architects were probably payed off by the government to create fault lines within the blueprints. Very hard noticeable faults. Such as 1/1000 of a cm off the support beams that no one would notice or take into consideration, I only wish I could see these blueprints my self, and compare it to the towers, but how can I now? Anyways, these flaws were taken as nothing, the building was made and what was done was done. Fixing a small portion of the tower could have costed them millions. So they ignored it. A plane travels averagely 500 m/h. Those winds created by the plane are just pure drafts, the force expelling the plane is greater then the wind as this causes the plane to go forward. As the plane moves forward, the wind follows the planes old path backwards, the draft. Its like opening a door. When you open it, you might feel a small wind because of the draft, you open a door causing force to expel the other way. Though you can feel it on both sides, which is because you are opening it an angle. If my calculations are correct, the building looses support as soon as that plane hits within 1-3 miles of that building, and if my theory is correct, that's the time these people may have claimed they heard an explosion. It was just merely the building collapsing due to high wind forces, forces that could have been prevented IF the architects were smarter, (oh you get what I mean) I dont wanna get into it alot more, but there is enough evidence to provide with my theory's. that was just a brief description of it, I have a 5 page one lodged into my brain somewhere

Little crazy studying 9/11 for 2 years eh? Anyways the information you're providing takes 10 minutes of research, seriously. Honestly, the government did plan this attack, I am a part engineer, still studying. For one that pentagon attack is very true, where could that gigantic plane have gone? It surely wasn't inside the pentagon and it surely wasn't big enough to do it, the problem I see is this. I think the government is a little smarter to check these kinds of things, we are in an era of having things checked time and time again, making sure that a plan goes out accordingly, or else it isn't from our era at all. 2 things could have happened here,

A) These plans were studied and created maybe a decade ago, we needed our oil from the middle east, and we had a bunch of hippies going around protesting to not allow our soldiers to be shipped there. They planned this attack, and blamed these middle easterns for it, to gain support to go to war with the middle east.

B) This plan could have been purposely sabotaged for people like me to realize it. I mean I did say the government is smarter then what is being shown on the table, so why didn't they make it a perfect plan? To keep Americans thinking -.-

The attack on the pentagon did not make any sense at all, and sure it had its flaws, believe it or not, I still think the Government played a HUGE role in this attack.

The Twin Towers attack, well that was very odd. All signs point to having bombs planted there, rednecks can't point out that those were planted... Or where they? Maybe there weren't any bombs at all? Stories say that they could hear explosions before a plane hit, well the fact of the matter, is that it might not have been explosions. Merely the steel or these 6 air attack resistant Poles you mentioned ****-busted after 1 plane hit. Each plane hit the twin towers yes, but not in 10 seconds of each other. Temperatures were reaching more then 2k degrees in the building. How could steel just collapse? Truth is, it melted. Architectural plans have to be designed so that if one structure of the building fails, the other SHOULD be able to support it for a short period of times. Take an example for a deck of cards. If you say, build a house out of it, (Normal house with the triangle shaped points, etc) if one card collapses the whole structure collapses. If we added support to both sides and a lot of it, we could probably manage for it to not fall. However, if that is applied to building with very heavy materials, such as steel, it is a problem, all that weight involved in just holding the simple structure of 4 corners is dangerous. Wind is one of the most causes of buildings to collapse. Architects have to take into consideration wind dynamics, such as repelling the wind instead of hitting the towers and not bouncing back. If they are applied evenly the building can remain in shape and in place, if not applied evenly, the building could tilt, and it has happened. It may not seem like it at all, but all it takes is 1/10th of an inch of movement from a building, to have a broken piece of the structure. If this one structure fails, then more will eventually fail, and thats what happened with the towers. The architects were probably payed off by the government to create fault lines within the blueprints. Very hard noticeable faults. Such as 1/1000 of a cm off the support beams that no one would notice or take into consideration, I only wish I could see these blueprints my self, and compare it to the towers, but how can I now? Anyways, these flaws were taken as nothing, the building was made and what was done was done. Fixing a small portion of the tower could have costed them millions. So they ignored it. A plane travels averagely 500 m/h. Those winds created by the plane are just pure drafts, the force expelling the plane is greater then the wind as this causes the plane to go forward. As the plane moves forward, the wind follows the planes old path backwards, the draft. Its like opening a door. When you open it, you might feel a small wind because of the draft, you open a door causing force to expel the other way. Though you can feel it on both sides, which is because you are opening it an angle. If my calculations are correct, the building looses support as soon as that plane hits within 1-3 miles of that building, and if my theory is correct, that's the time these people may have claimed they heard an explosion. It was just merely the building collapsing due to high wind forces, forces that could have been prevented IF the architects were smarter, (oh you get what I mean) I dont wanna get into it alot more, but there is enough evidence to provide with my theory's. that was just a brief description of it, I have a 5 page one lodged into my brain somewhere