Actually, our government did not plan it you sickos

TTG_FROSTY970 wrote

-Crayons- wrote

DJ_Pon3 wrote Wrong section, i don't think it was planned, why would the government kill 3000 Innocent people?

Because they can make a war and there's something that makes us money and slot

WAR=MONEY dont argue because if u look at the fact of afganistan our country gained 7.9 billion in a week

yet we are trillions of dollars in debt... You sir are wrong

actually hes rite war does make money BUT to private defense contractors.

THIS is how the money is distributed:

Private "defense" contractors give millions to politicians. Politicians run a very expensive campaign to get elected. They run for presidency and win. They(politicians) plan something like 9/11. Americans (out of fear/anger) agree we need to go to war. The U.S hires these private "defense" contractors. Contractors make TRILLIONS. Cycle repeats.

And I am sure in 1974 we were seriously concerned about muslim terrorists hitting the towers when we added these so called airstrike beams...(sorry they were muslim...) and it's Al-Qaeda I bet you must of really looked into a lot if you don't know how to spell it..

661King wrote

TTG_FROSTY970 wrote

-Crayons- wrote

DJ_Pon3 wrote Wrong section, i don't think it was planned, why would the government kill 3000 Innocent people?

Because they can make a war and there's something that makes us money and slot

WAR=MONEY dont argue because if u look at the fact of afganistan our country gained 7.9 billion in a week

yet we are trillions of dollars in debt... You sir are wrong

actually hes rite war does make money BUT to private defense contractors.

THIS is how the money is distributed:

Private "defense" contractors give millions to politicians. Politicians run a very expensive campaign to get elected. They run for presidency and win. They(politicians) plan something like 9/11. Americans (out of fear/anger) agree we need to go to war. The U.S hires these private "defense" contractors. Contractors make TRILLIONS. Cycle repeats.

Private defense contractors do not make enough money to support a presidential campaign run or a miniscule one for that matter, once the country agrees to go to war then we use our armed forces, not contractors. We use contractors for shit we aren't supposed to be in as in private missions. Trillions? I highly doubt they have trillions as then they could pay off the United States debt of 7 Trillion,

Today, we gather to be reassured that God hears the lamenting and bitter weeping of Mother America because so many of her children are no more. Let us now seek that assurance in prayer for the healing of our grief stricken hearts, for the souls and sacred memory of those who have been lost. Let us also pray for divine wisdom as our leaders consider the necessary actions for national security, wisdom of the grace of God that as we act, we not become the evil we deplore.

Agitator wrote

661King wrote

TTG_FROSTY970 wrote

-Crayons- wrote

DJ_Pon3 wrote Wrong section, i don't think it was planned, why would the government kill 3000 Innocent people?

Because they can make a war and there's something that makes us money and slot

WAR=MONEY dont argue because if u look at the fact of afganistan our country gained 7.9 billion in a week

yet we are trillions of dollars in debt... You sir are wrong

actually hes rite war does make money BUT to private defense contractors.

THIS is how the money is distributed:

Private "defense" contractors give millions to politicians. Politicians run a very expensive campaign to get elected. They run for presidency and win. They(politicians) plan something like 9/11. Americans (out of fear/anger) agree we need to go to war. The U.S hires these private "defense" contractors. Contractors make TRILLIONS. Cycle repeats.

Private defense contractors do not make enough money to support a presidential campaign run or a miniscule one for that matter, once the country agrees to go to war then we use our armed forces, not contractors. We use contractors for **** we aren't supposed to be in as in private missions. Trillions? I highly doubt they have trillions as then they could pay off the United States debt of 7 Trillion,

they donate a couple millions to the politicians, they don't fund all of it. they make trillions where do you think the U.S. gets there missiles, tanks, airplanes ect. Walmart? no, try again. Yes they could pay off the debt but its their money. Why would they pay off our debt? its like saying you pay off my debt.

source: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
and thats just the amount of money the government wants you to see

EDIT: found a more recent source

this was planned come on... please if you believe that our government is the best people and take care of us you are going to be the first to die

Agitator wrote

661King wrote

TTG_FROSTY970 wrote

-Crayons- wrote

DJ_Pon3 wrote Wrong section, i don't think it was planned, why would the government kill 3000 Innocent people?

Because they can make a war and there's something that makes us money and slot

WAR=MONEY dont argue because if u look at the fact of afganistan our country gained 7.9 billion in a week

yet we are trillions of dollars in debt... You sir are wrong

actually hes rite war does make money BUT to private defense contractors.

THIS is how the money is distributed:

Private "defense" contractors give millions to politicians. Politicians run a very expensive campaign to get elected. They run for presidency and win. They(politicians) plan something like 9/11. Americans (out of fear/anger) agree we need to go to war. The U.S hires these private "defense" contractors. Contractors make TRILLIONS. Cycle repeats.

Private defense contractors do not make enough money to support a presidential campaign run or a miniscule one for that matter, once the country agrees to go to war then we use our armed forces, not contractors. We use contractors for **** we aren't supposed to be in as in private missions. Trillions? I highly doubt they have trillions as then they could pay off the United States debt of 7 Trillion,

:facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:
The US DOES use contractors, lookup Blackwater

661King wrote

TTG_FROSTY970 wrote

-Crayons- wrote

DJ_Pon3 wrote Wrong section, i don't think it was planned, why would the government kill 3000 Innocent people?

Because they can make a war and there's something that makes us money and slot

WAR=MONEY dont argue because if u look at the fact of afganistan our country gained 7.9 billion in a week

yet we are trillions of dollars in debt... You sir are wrong

actually hes rite war does make money BUT to private defense contractors.

THIS is how the money is distributed:

Private "defense" contractors give millions to politicians. Politicians run a very expensive campaign to get elected. They run for presidency and win. They(politicians) plan something like 9/11. Americans (out of fear/anger) agree we need to go to war. The U.S hires these private "defense" contractors. Contractors make TRILLIONS. Cycle repeats.

yes, i absolutely agree it has been written and rewritten through out american history from day 1

Agitator wrote And I am sure in 1974 we were seriously concerned about muslim terrorists hitting the towers when we added these so called airstrike beams...(sorry they were muslim...) and it's Al-Qaeda I bet you must of really looked into a lot if you don't know how to spell it..

we weren't concerned with any 1 "type" or "race" of person, we were concerned with air attacks in gerneral