You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Senators Demand the Military Lock Up American Citizens
Posted:
Senators Demand the Military Lock Up American CitizensPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 922
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 922
Reputation Power: 40
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
While nearly all Americans head to family and friends to celebrate Thanksgiving, the Senate is gearing up for a vote on Monday or Tuesday that goes to the very heart of who we are as Americans. The Senate will be voting on a bill that will direct American military resources not at an enemy shooting at our military in a war zone, but at American citizens and other civilians far from any battlefield even people in the United States itself.
Senators need to hear from you, on whether you think your front yard is part of a battlefield and if any president can send the military anywhere in the world to imprison civilians without charge or trial.
The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this presidentand every future president the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world. Even Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) raised his concerns about the NDAA detention provisions during last nights Republican debate. The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself.
The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday. The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing.
I know it sounds incredible. New powers to use the military worldwide, even within the United States? Hasnt anyone told the Senate that Osama bin Laden is dead, that the president is pulling all of the combat troops out of Iraq and trying to figure out how to get combat troops out of Afghanistan too? And American citizens and people picked up on American or Canadian or British streets being sent to military prisons indefinitely without even being charged with a crime. Really? Does anyone think this is a good idea? And why now?
The answer on why now is nothing more than election season politics. The White House, the Secretary of Defense, and the Attorney General have all said that the indefinite detention provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act are harmful and counterproductive. The White House has even threatened a veto. But Senate politics has propelled this bad legislation to the Senate floor.
But there is a way to stop this dangerous legislation. Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) is offering the Udall Amendment that will delete the harmful provisions and replace them with a requirement for an orderly Congressional review of detention power. The Udall Amendment will make sure that the bill matches up with American values.
In support of this harmful bill, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) explained that the bill will basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial American citizen or not. Another supporter, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) also declared that the bill is needed because America is part of the battlefield.
The solution is the Udall Amendment; a way for the Senate to say no to indefinite detention without charge or trial anywhere in the world where any president decides to use the military. Instead of simply going along with a bill that was drafted in secret and is being jammed through the Senate, the Udall Amendment deletes the provisions and sets up an orderly review of detention power. It tries to take the politics out and put American values back in.
In response to proponents of the indefinite detention legislation who contend that the bill applies to American citizens and designates the world as the battlefield, and that the heart of the issue is whether or not the United States is part of the battlefield, Sen. Udall disagrees, and says that we can win this fight without worldwide war and worldwide indefinite detention.
The senators pushing the indefinite detention proposal have made their goals very clear that they want an okay for a worldwide military battlefield, that even extends to your hometown. That is an extreme position that will forever change our country.
While nearly all Americans head to family and friends to celebrate Thanksgiving, the Senate is gearing up for a vote on Monday or Tuesday that goes to the very heart of who we are as Americans. The Senate will be voting on a bill that will direct American military resources not at an enemy shooting at our military in a war zone, but at American citizens and other civilians far from any battlefield even people in the United States itself.
Senators need to hear from you, on whether you think your front yard is part of a battlefield and if any president can send the military anywhere in the world to imprison civilians without charge or trial.
The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this presidentand every future president the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world. Even Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) raised his concerns about the NDAA detention provisions during last nights Republican debate. The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself.
The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday. The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing.
I know it sounds incredible. New powers to use the military worldwide, even within the United States? Hasnt anyone told the Senate that Osama bin Laden is dead, that the president is pulling all of the combat troops out of Iraq and trying to figure out how to get combat troops out of Afghanistan too? And American citizens and people picked up on American or Canadian or British streets being sent to military prisons indefinitely without even being charged with a crime. Really? Does anyone think this is a good idea? And why now?
The answer on why now is nothing more than election season politics. The White House, the Secretary of Defense, and the Attorney General have all said that the indefinite detention provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act are harmful and counterproductive. The White House has even threatened a veto. But Senate politics has propelled this bad legislation to the Senate floor.
But there is a way to stop this dangerous legislation. Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) is offering the Udall Amendment that will delete the harmful provisions and replace them with a requirement for an orderly Congressional review of detention power. The Udall Amendment will make sure that the bill matches up with American values.
In support of this harmful bill, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) explained that the bill will basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial American citizen or not. Another supporter, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) also declared that the bill is needed because America is part of the battlefield.
The solution is the Udall Amendment; a way for the Senate to say no to indefinite detention without charge or trial anywhere in the world where any president decides to use the military. Instead of simply going along with a bill that was drafted in secret and is being jammed through the Senate, the Udall Amendment deletes the provisions and sets up an orderly review of detention power. It tries to take the politics out and put American values back in.
In response to proponents of the indefinite detention legislation who contend that the bill applies to American citizens and designates the world as the battlefield, and that the heart of the issue is whether or not the United States is part of the battlefield, Sen. Udall disagrees, and says that we can win this fight without worldwide war and worldwide indefinite detention.
The senators pushing the indefinite detention proposal have made their goals very clear that they want an okay for a worldwide military battlefield, that even extends to your hometown. That is an extreme position that will forever change our country.
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 279
Reputation Power: 11
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 279
Reputation Power: 11
in the words of stewie griffen: this is why the other countries are beating us you know!
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 05, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,061
Reputation Power: 207
wait so uhh, theres gonna be some badass stuff in my front yard ?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 922
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 922
Reputation Power: 40
Pretty much bro meaning its going to look like Battlefield and MW3 but not chaotic.. yet
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 103
Reputation Power: 4
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 103
Reputation Power: 4
Ok,our goverment may not be in their right minds, but im pretty sure this want happen. Our military wouldnt do anything like that. Just think, the brave men and women(who you apperantly dont appreciate) Go into the military because they are patriotic, And love this country, They wouldnt go around imprisoning Americans. And if they do(which they want) Every American that is sane on a gun/weopon.
But thats my opinion and you got yours. I mean thats why our troops are fighting so you have freedom of speech.
But thats my opinion and you got yours. I mean thats why our troops are fighting so you have freedom of speech.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 922
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 922
Reputation Power: 40
But the government are the ones who pays for their bills. They devote themselves to them. Its like the knights protecting their king/queen. Our soldiers are the knights and the king and queen are the president and the first lady.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,146
Reputation Power: 48
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,146
Reputation Power: 48
This sounds a lot like Fema Camps :=?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201014Year Member
Posts: 37
Reputation Power: 1
Wouldn't the Supreme Court throw that act out..? It violates the Constitution and the Bill of Rights if I'm not mistaken.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,903
Reputation Power: 70
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,903
Reputation Power: 70
Nobody will believe me, but once again I say this is all part of the NWO about to begin ad they will be able to imprison us without any trials or charges. This will be the reason we will go to jail if not accepting the new "policies". I'll stop now so I'm not called insane and get ranted
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 14, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,418
Reputation Power: 91
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 14, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,418
Reputation Power: 91
Qwikscoper wrote Nobody will believe me, but once again I say this is all part of the NWO about to begin ad they will be able to imprison us without any trials or charges. This will be the reason we will go to jail if not accepting the new "policies". I'll stop now so I'm not called insane and get rantedbro I have a demon in my house and I might be semi possessed and I still sound more sane than you lol
- 0useful
- 1not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.