ChampionDzn wrote That is your opinion....Call Of Duty Wasnt Made To Be Realistic Like Battlefield. It Was Made Because It Had A Very Successful Online Multiplayer Experience Hence Why More People Buy And Play COD. If Your Looking For A Fun Multiplayer FPS Go To COD, If Your Looking For A Realistic FPS Go To Battlefield.

excuse me i think Battlefield 3 online is even more fun than mw3

dabomb12321 wrote If you hate it so much why do you host cod5 lobbies? And under F.A.Q. you put not a question for one of them arent you smart.

Notice how I praised Cod4 and 5 :facepalm:

-Faith wrote but that is the whole point. It is a series which things have it be continued with everything. Obv it can't be the exactt same but things change and have to be rethinked. DVD's, Video, Games, all the series are linked together, thats why they are near enough the same :arrow:

You are probably the only person who has made any logic at all out of all of the posters. Half of the people here are BF3 fanboys(biggest one being Connerkills), and the other half are COD fanboys talking out of there a**es trying to protect there favorite game. You sir get 1,000 interweb moneyz!

IneedMODz_PleasE wrote

-Faith wrote but that is the whole point. It is a series which things have it be continued with everything. Obv it can't be the exactt same but things change and have to be rethinked. DVD's, Video, Games, all the series are linked together, thats why they are near enough the same :arrow:

You are probably the only person who has made any logic at all out of all of the posters. Half of the people here are BF3 fanboys, and the other half are COD fanboys talking out of there a**es trying to protect there favorite game. You sir get 1,000 interweb moneyz!

you both dont seem to get my point what I mean is that CoD refuses to try to add new styles of gameplay to their game or make it modding free or even adding a new engine. They rush themselves to make a new game every single year instead of stopping and actually taking time to put more into each game. Each developers only spends 2 years making their games while other games have over 4 years of development. Other games have far more advanced gameplay and much more powerful engines. I am not a fanboy I loved Cod2, 4 and 5. I love skyrim and battlefield too just I want the makers of CoD to come out with a game equivalent to those games in performance.

ConnorKILLS wrote

IneedMODz_PleasE wrote

-Faith wrote but that is the whole point. It is a series which things have it be continued with everything. Obv it can't be the exactt same but things change and have to be rethinked. DVD's, Video, Games, all the series are linked together, thats why they are near enough the same :arrow:

You are probably the only person who has made any logic at all out of all of the posters. Half of the people here are BF3 fanboys, and the other half are COD fanboys talking out of there a**es trying to protect there favorite game. You sir get 1,000 interweb moneyz!

you both dont seem to get my point what I mean is that CoD refuses to try to add new styles of gameplay to their game or make it modding free or even adding a new engine. They rush themselves to make a new game every single year instead of stopping and actually taking time to put more into each game. Each developers only spends 2 years making their games while other games have over 4 years of development. Other games have far more advanced gameplay and much more powerful engines. I am not a fanboy I loved Cod2, 4 and 5. I love skyrim and battlefield too just I want the makers of CoD to come out with a game equivalent to those games in performance.

Exactly.

Ok, here we go. I buy the game because it stays the same. It takes ideas from other games, thus making it a better game. Its a bit of old and a bit of new to make it just right. It reminds me of the good old CoD's, but it also makes me think of the future of gaming. Thank you CoD, thank you.

Call of duty 4 was the best out of all of them, because theres not many tryhards, theres NO boosting, no tryhards going for nukes and theres no support class that saves your killstreak from dying I mean c'mon people cannt just get there killstreaks legit and not use support, but noo annd in Mw2 Mw3 and Black Ops people boost and its really annoying. But in good old CoD4 nobody is boosting and everybody is sniping and not trying there hardest!

Finishing_Touch wrote Call of duty 4 was the best out of all of them, because theres not many tryhards, theres NO boosting, no tryhards going for nukes and theres no support class that saves your killstreak from dying I mean c'mon people cannt just get there killstreaks legit and not use support, but noo annd in Mw2 Mw3 and Black Ops people boost and its really annoying. But in good old CoD4 nobody is boosting and everybody is sniping and not trying there hardest!

I love those cod4 games where every guy is quickscoping

World at War is an abomination

EElementZ wrote World at War is an abomination

world at war was brilliant