You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#31. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 27, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,220
Reputation Power: 61
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 27, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,220
Reputation Power: 61
Parrot wroteauudieHD wrote No this is not true. Yes Obama did sign but if you actually read any of the articles it would not sound so bad. Obama signed BUT, he stated that the controversial parts of the law would be changed.
No, not true if you take the time to read the wiki article, you can clearly see that nothing has been changed, that was controversial. Obama only said that to ease the suspicions of U.S citizens.
And you believe everything you see on WIKIPEDIA.
:facepalm:
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#32. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,418
Reputation Power: 103
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,418
Reputation Power: 103
NoWay wroteParrot wroteauudieHD wrote No this is not true. Yes Obama did sign but if you actually read any of the articles it would not sound so bad. Obama signed BUT, he stated that the controversial parts of the law would be changed.
No, not true if you take the time to read the wiki article, you can clearly see that nothing has been changed, that was controversial. Obama only said that to ease the suspicions of U.S citizens.
And you believe everything you see on WIKIPEDIA.
:facepalm:
Its not called Wikipedia the free encoyplodia anyone can edit for no reason.
Last edited by Zine ; edited 1 time in total
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#33. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 505
Reputation Power: 26
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 505
Reputation Power: 26
Who cares.!! just Nod your head about it and don't do anything wrong and it wont happen to you.. Stop getting worked up about it.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#34. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,649
Reputation Power: 70
im as american as it gets u have nothing to worry about with me
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#35. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201113Year Member
Posts: 614
Reputation Power: 26
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201113Year Member
Posts: 614
Reputation Power: 26
only thing they can arrest are thees nutz :trollin:
- 3useful
- 0not useful
#36. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 595
Reputation Power: 25
NoWay wroteParrot wroteauudieHD wrote No this is not true. Yes Obama did sign but if you actually read any of the articles it would not sound so bad. Obama signed BUT, he stated that the controversial parts of the law would be changed.
No, not true if you take the time to read the wiki article, you can clearly see that nothing has been changed, that was controversial. Obama only said that to ease the suspicions of U.S citizens.
And you believe everything you see on WIKIPEDIA.
:facepalm:
No, i don't actually. I've gone and done some research on this specific bill, and yes most of the things in the bill, posted on Wikipedia are true. On a side note, Wikipedia monitors their Wiki's and will make sure that nothing is "bogus", or false info.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#37. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 24, 201014Year Member
Posts: 499
Reputation Power: 22
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 24, 201014Year Member
Posts: 499
Reputation Power: 22
Yeah SOPA is worldwide doesnt just affect America, it effects everyone. And you got this from Wikipedia?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#38. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 10, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,223
Reputation Power: 94
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 10, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,223
Reputation Power: 94
NoWay wroteI know right anyone can go on wiki and chagr it I can say Shakespeare was a magic potatoParrot wroteauudieHD wrote No this is not true. Yes Obama did sign but if you actually read any of the articles it would not sound so bad. Obama signed BUT, he stated that the controversial parts of the law would be changed.
No, not true if you take the time to read the wiki article, you can clearly see that nothing has been changed, that was controversial. Obama only said that to ease the suspicions of U.S citizens.
And you believe everything you see on WIKIPEDIA.
:facepalm:
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#39. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 5,325
Reputation Power: 372
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 5,325
Reputation Power: 372
Thank god I live in the UK
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#40. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 07, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,369
Reputation Power: 60
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 07, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,369
Reputation Power: 60
GSN1PA360 wrote This means they can only arrest Terrorists am I correct? Because why the hell would they go to a different country and arrest some random guy... The country that we took the terrorist from would be thankfull...
nope, they can arrest anyone, anywhere in the US!!! so Watch out!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.