You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
What "The Bible" Never Mentions...
Posted:
What "The Bible" Never Mentions...Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 136
Reputation Power: 6
The Bible never mentions pre-historic animals (Dinosaurs etc)
But we have proof they existed, because of fossils and remains that have been discovered by archaeologist's.
So where do they fit into the "Bible"?
I am an Atheist and DO NOT believe in "God" I believe that there is a "God" But that they visited Earth millions of years ago. and that they are "Extra-terrestrial Beings" [Aliens].
[My Opinion no offence intended]
But we have proof they existed, because of fossils and remains that have been discovered by archaeologist's.
So where do they fit into the "Bible"?
I am an Atheist and DO NOT believe in "God" I believe that there is a "God" But that they visited Earth millions of years ago. and that they are "Extra-terrestrial Beings" [Aliens].
[My Opinion no offence intended]
Edit:
I don't mean the actual word 'Dinosaur' I mean there is no evidence anywhere. They could've called them 'pre-historic beings' / 'Pre-historic Animals' / 'Pre-historic Creatures' etc...
And The Bible states that The Earth was created in 7 days. Whatever order it was in. it says 7 days. And there is no recollection AT ALL of GOD creating 'DINOSAURS'!!
My point, Proven!
And The Bible states that The Earth was created in 7 days. Whatever order it was in. it says 7 days. And there is no recollection AT ALL of GOD creating 'DINOSAURS'!!
My point, Proven!
Last edited by Moosoo ; edited 1 time in total
The following 1 user thanked Moosoo for this useful post:
-Tom (02-04-2012)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,156
Reputation Power: 68
This is why Sarah Palin doesnt believe in dinosaurs?
-Walk
-Walk
- 4useful
- 8not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,557
Reputation Power: 63
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,557
Reputation Power: 63
imagine your reading a book and instead of starting off with the main character it started off with every ancient relative of that person....wouldnt be a very good book would it?
- 13useful
- 2not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 08, 201212Year Member
Posts: 395
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 08, 201212Year Member
Posts: 395
Reputation Power: 19
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 675
Reputation Power: 21
Job 40:15-19
The reason the word dinosaur is never used:
The word "dinosaur" was not invented until 1841. It could not be used by early translators of the Bible. For example, the King James Version translation was completed in 1611, over 200 years before the word "dinosaur" was created.
The reason the word dinosaur is never used:
The word "dinosaur" was not invented until 1841. It could not be used by early translators of the Bible. For example, the King James Version translation was completed in 1611, over 200 years before the word "dinosaur" was created.
- 12useful
- 1not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 14, 201212Year Member
Posts: 24
Reputation Power: 0
First of all the when people decided what was going to be in The Bible, it was during the Fall of the Roman Empire around the year 300-500 A.D. therefore nobody had even known about dinosaurs or certain pre-historic animals. Your theory according to widely known facts makes no sense at all.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 13,074
Reputation Power: 2221
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 13,074
Reputation Power: 2221
Walk wrote This is why Sarah Palin doesnt believe in dinosaurs?
-Walk
Because she is a woman.
- 16useful
- 1not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 10, 201113Year Member
Posts: 966
Reputation Power: 41
HMM?? maybe because scientists say dinosaurs are from 52 or w\e millions years ago?? and the bible was written in what 50 A.D. so hmm, your theory, is a bad one.
Don't be hating on me for the facts.
Don't be hating on me for the facts.
- 1useful
- 3not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,159
Reputation Power: 394
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 19, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,159
Reputation Power: 394
Beer wrote HMM?? maybe because scientists say dinosaurs are from 52 or w\e millions years ago?? and the bible was written in what 50 A.D. so hmm, your theory, is a bad one.
Don't be hating on me for the facts.
If we can still find dinosaur bones this far from when dinosaurs existed, then anyone back then could've.
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 898
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 898
Reputation Power: 38
i dont know if dinosaurs could be applied in the bible
- 1useful
- 1not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.