3Arc is more organized
but Infinity ward is just more fun

IW Pros: Fun Multiplayer. New features, Survival, ELITE, Infected Dropzone.
IW Cons: No zombies

3arc Pros: Zombies
3arc Cons: Almost everything in the **** game.

[quote="Monopoly_Man"

2. IW does not try new things

3. 3arc has a ton of originality

/quote]

Are you retarded? IW successfully veered off the WWII genre and started the modern era shooters...

IW - They made Two of the best CoD games there is Modern Warfare & MW2 and they stepped down and gave Treyarch a go and they produced the s**t we know as today as Black Ops, The only good thing about Black Ops is the Zombies and Customising your Player Card.

IW ignores the Customers once the game is bought your just a number to them where as Treyarch help their customers.

IW is original, Survival mode, Online Infected, New Killstreak system, New Modes, Prestige Token, And they added new Prestiges to keep the players going and not getting bored.

3ARC by far. They at least change they're games and give you a totally different experience.

IW's Call of Duties are all the same.

I like IW a lot better.

o_______O wrote

-FALz wrote IW mainly because they have better graphics. 3arcs graphics aren't all that good.

Grafics doesn't matter.

Graphics do matter you dont want a game with no quality

Monopoly_Man wrote Personally Ill have to go with 3arc. Below are some reasons

1. IW does not listen to the communtiy at all

2. IW does not try new things

3. 3arc has a ton of originality


So who do you like better? And dont forget to add why

and what exactly original did 3arc do besides zombies,which lets face it there was plenty of zombie games before......theater mode,halo.title and shit.mw2,being able to make it how u want is like the only original thing in black ops.....and idgaf i just want to play.play and u don't see playercards.......how does iw not try new things?modern warefare,titles and shit,community playlists,elite.iw does listen to the community,but they take there time "fixing" what people say is wrong,instead of just underpowering a gun bc it was too "overpowered."id rather have "overpowered" guns over underpowered.after that,do i even have to put which i like more?????

both have benifits 3arc zombies
iw qs n a whole lot more for both

yo2434 wrote

Monopoly_Man wrote Personally Ill have to go with 3arc. Below are some reasons

1. IW does not listen to the communtiy at all

2. IW does not try new things

3. 3arc has a ton of originality


So who do you like better? And dont forget to add why

and what exactly original did 3arc do besides zombies,which lets face it there was plenty of zombie games before......theater mode,halo.title and ****.mw2,being able to make it how u want is like the only original thing in black ops.....and idgaf i just want to play.play and u don't see playercards.......how does iw not try new things?modern warefare,titles and ****,community playlists,elite.iw does listen to the community,but they take there time "fixing" what people say is wrong,instead of just underpowering a gun bc it was too "overpowered."id rather have "overpowered" guns over underpowered.after that,do i even have to put which i like more?????

ohhh yeah and not to mention INFINTY WARD made cod.so without them there wouldnt be this discussion right now...........