It's for the greater good.

nah, i dont think its a bad idea, we should have population controll

it should be a 2 kids per set or parents they way we keep the same population

iiMrHiv wrote

-Yonkers- wrote Terrible Idea.

What if some of your loved ones who were older got killed?

Im a selfish f*** i wouldnt care that much as long as it was for the greater good of humanity

Um.. whats wrong with you? Its a terrible idea. smh..

the world needs peace
Tupac tried to get the message across, but he died for it.

[quote="famousxvirus"]In The Means of Killing People. NOOOO. In the Means of Limiting the amount of kids people can have for a while sure[/quote
Good idea but killing people, hwo do you know they wouldnt kill your sorry a$$ first???

I'd be fine with it, but as long as were not taking human life's.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure in China majority of the families disown a child that's not a boy, because the girls don't carry on the family last name. If we took something up like that, the problem will only grow.
What we should focus on is colonizing planets that are suitable for life.

Yes. Although it will never happen.

Look at mexico. Many women have children at ages 15-20 and they have about 5 in the span of at max 10 years. Do they have police to enforce this? No. Only the cartel.

So i think its needed but with liberals and obama in office it will never happen. And oh by the way I'm not saying republicans would go for it but China is who does it and they are communist so....

noooooooooo SAVE THE KIDS

I have a better idea. All of these whores need to stop having babies at 16 and parents need to wear rubber most of the time when they have sex. We do not need parents with more than 4 kids.

iiMrHiv wrote I know you would say im a selfish f*** for saying this but as long as i wasnt killed for population control i wolud be fine with it, think about it we could actually have resouces like oil and wood because their would be less people to use it. Post your thoughts

Kill helpless babies, go ahead. But oil isn't needed, kid. Gas and oil are both just used to make money at this point. We would be industrialy growing hemp to make paper and clothing and string ect. We aren't why? Because the logging corporations would be losing money. You are a idiot, sir.