You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#1851. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
Rune wroter00t_b33r wroteRune wrote Im thinking about buying the audio technicas m50s, is it worth it?
Yes, but there are better options now. They're not a bad buy, still, just the THE best. Instead, look at the Ultrasone HFI-580 and Brainwavz HM5.
Are they good for listening to rap, rock, classic rock. I like heavy bass too.
Yes, any of these are.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#1852. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 25, 201112Year Member
Posts: 87
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 25, 201112Year Member
Posts: 87
Reputation Power: 3
Beats are amazing i have 3 pairs
- 0useful
- 3not useful
#1853. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,807
Reputation Power: 82
damn this post has so many replies thats how you know your a wizard
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#1854. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,391
Reputation Power: 63
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,391
Reputation Power: 63
JTMZephyr wrote Beats are amazing i have 3 pairsyh i have beats there amazing had skullcandy's befor diddnt really like them
- 0useful
- 2not useful
#1855. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
JTMZephyr wrote Beats are amazing i have 3 pairs
Seriously, if you can, return them. Read the OP, I explained why. I also specifically said not to post things like this.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#1856. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
HGM_Leader wroteJTMZephyr wrote Beats are amazing i have 3 pairsyh i have beats there amazing had skullcandy's befor diddnt really like them
Unfortunately, they're both garbage. Again, I explained why in the OP.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#1857. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 26, 201112Year Member
Posts: 233
Reputation Power: 13
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 26, 201112Year Member
Posts: 233
Reputation Power: 13
r00t_b33r wroteHGM_Leader wroteJTMZephyr wrote Beats are amazing i have 3 pairsyh i have beats there amazing had skullcandy's befor diddnt really like them
Unfortunately, they're both garbage. Again, I explained why in the OP.
Skullcandies are not all bad, the newer products are designed in house and actually sound nice for the price. Beats on the other hand, not good at all. The Skullcandy aviator destroyed the Studio in bass. Cheap older skullcandies are terrible though.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#1858. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
Parall3l wroter00t_b33r wroteHGM_Leader wroteJTMZephyr wrote Beats are amazing i have 3 pairsyh i have beats there amazing had skullcandy's befor diddnt really like them
Unfortunately, they're both garbage. Again, I explained why in the OP.
Skullcandies are not all bad, the newer products are designed in house and actually sound nice for the price. Beats on the other hand, not good at all. The Skullcandy aviator destroyed the Studio in bass. Cheap older skullcandies are terrible though.
I actually got to use a pair of Aviators a few days ago, and I was pretty impressed. Since the M50 is my only real reference, that's all I can use to judge them. The Aviators do not isolate well at all, are not built nearly as well, and the cable is not so great. Still, the sound is more fun than the M50, and I loved it for electronic music. I actually thought they were pretty bad for rock, which I found strange. They seem to be marketed at the rock crowd. They're definitely bassy and I found the soundstage to be very good. Unfortunately, I didn't have enough time to make a conclusion on the overall sound, but from what I heard, the M50 has better overall sound quality.
When I say Skullcandy sucks, I just mean in general. I don't feel like taking the time to explain their more recent developments, and people are rarely, if ever, thinking of the Aviator or Mix Master.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#1859. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 26, 201112Year Member
Posts: 233
Reputation Power: 13
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 26, 201112Year Member
Posts: 233
Reputation Power: 13
When I say Skullcandy sucks, I just mean in general. I don't feel like taking the time to explain their more recent developments, and people are rarely, if ever, thinking of the Aviator or Mix Master.[/quote]
Don't feel like talking? Just add a short paragraph and link this video interview Jude did with their engineer.
Don't feel like talking? Just add a short paragraph and link this video interview Jude did with their engineer.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#1860. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,416
Reputation Power: 24459
Yeah, I'll probably just add a passage about Skullcandy in the OP. Still, nobody reads the OP or any of the thread on this site. I have to direct them to it.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.