Halo4 wrote

Austin_Powers wrote

Halo was fun back in the day.. But it never really changed..

No, that's the thing Bungie did wrong with Reach.. they changed it a little to much and started going crazy with these weird new things.

If they would have kept it like Halo 3 but fix the problems that Halo 3 would of had, it would have been the perfect Halo game.

They only things that they did perfect was in Reach was the Forge, Campaign, and Firefight.

And the armory, can't forget about the armory

Jetpack and sprint were the only good abilities in reach but still great game halo 2 was the best though I hope they remake it

I agree, halo is far better than cod

I like them both but at least in CoD I can't hold LB for god mode. But in Reach I can.

Why start this if you haven't done any research? Clearly you are a squeaker

Darqe wrote It's the other way around, there wouldn't be a halo without xbox. Also 343 Industries has just ruined the Halo franchise, I stopped playing reach when they taken over, Halo 3 FTW!

Actually I think that they fixed reach up a little bit and why do people keep on hating on 343 they are mostly made up of ex-bungie members

Halo 2 and three is better than every cod....expct its a close tie between halo2 and mw2

TTGOpS wrote halo started off xbox thats true but COD came and :idea: slapped HALO. COD is more realistic than halo and a bunch of little kids play it. they get really annoying

COD's full of 12 year olds.

Also, who cares if Halo isn't realistic? Games aren't really meant to be.

welliFX wrote no way!

i think halo is worse than cod... and cod is bad!

Dissed Halo, AND cod? you done **** up.

I used to LOVE Halo but now its kinda getting boring just like Xbox i suppose