You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
What Is Your opinion On MC Bans.com?
Posted:
What Is Your opinion On MC Bans.com?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 08, 201113Year Member
Posts: 153
Reputation Power: 8
What Is Your opinion On MC Bans.com?
What i think
The system is based around the idea that you can trust an individual with the power to ban a person from dozens of servers.
They went about it the wrong way. It should have been a closed system, with voting influence. Here is how they should have gone about it:
Make a system where an admin can file a complaint. This user is then look at by the community via website. The admin and user may both give short statements about the complaint, along with images. The user is then voted on by poll. If the user is voted a griefer, then he is put on a "low" list. The more complaints a person gets, the more he is bummed to different lists. An admin may choose in the config witch list equals banned. A creative server may say that you are banned if you are on the "low list". If you are voted innocent, you are put on watching.
What i think
The system is based around the idea that you can trust an individual with the power to ban a person from dozens of servers.
They went about it the wrong way. It should have been a closed system, with voting influence. Here is how they should have gone about it:
Make a system where an admin can file a complaint. This user is then look at by the community via website. The admin and user may both give short statements about the complaint, along with images. The user is then voted on by poll. If the user is voted a griefer, then he is put on a "low" list. The more complaints a person gets, the more he is bummed to different lists. An admin may choose in the config witch list equals banned. A creative server may say that you are banned if you are on the "low list". If you are voted innocent, you are put on watching.
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 10, 201113Year Member
Posts: 534
Reputation Power: 25
Totally agreed bro, this is a more fair way to control bans
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,025
Reputation Power: 134
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,025
Reputation Power: 134
This is a good way to do it, but if your caught griefing, you need to be banned. Not put on trial. Its the way things work. Dont try to change them.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.