You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
i just thought of this.
Posted:
i just thought of this.Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 507
Reputation Power: 25
instead of testing products on animals why not test them on prisoners who have commited murder and stuff and deserve to be tested on , just a thought , and no trolls please because no one really likes you.
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 986
Reputation Power: 44
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 986
Reputation Power: 44
To be honest sounds like a good idea
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 58
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 58
Reputation Power: 2
dude that may be one of the best ideas ive heard in a long time!! why don't you go tell like a news reporter and see what they say!
- 0useful
- 2not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,574
Reputation Power: 69
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,574
Reputation Power: 69
ummmhhh, sounds sorta inhumane. if it were to cause a death
and lets say someone's serving life, witch is like 15 years
if that person dies well then it's unfair. then the prison will be
sued and government has explaining to do, and potentially have
money to pay up.
Last edited by Creds ; edited 1 time in total
and lets say someone's serving life, witch is like 15 years
if that person dies well then it's unfair. then the prison will be
sued and government has explaining to do, and potentially have
money to pay up.
Last edited by Creds ; edited 1 time in total
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 507
Reputation Power: 25
hehe thanks i dont get why innocent animals endure this and people that have claimed lives can live the rest of their lives care free in a cell with food and shelter while their victims families grieve , they deserve to be tested on
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 507
Reputation Power: 25
B3ASTiixRAMPAG3 wrote ummmhhh, sounds sorta inhumane. if it were to cause a deathan eye for an eye makes the whole world blind my friend , if they have killed someone who was loved by many people then why should they have the right to live in a cell the rest of their life with food and shelter , they dont deserve rights and nothing inhumane can be done to something that isnt human
and lets say someone's serving life, witch is like 15 years
if that person dies well then it's unfair. then they will be
sued and government has explaining to do, and potentially have
money to pay up.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,574
Reputation Power: 69
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,574
Reputation Power: 69
reece97 wroteB3ASTiixRAMPAG3 wrote ummmhhh, sounds sorta inhumane. if it were to cause a deathan eye for an eye makes the whole world blind my friend , if they have killed someone who was loved by many people then why should they have the right to live in a cell the rest of their life with food and shelter , they dont deserve rights and nothing inhumane can be done to something that isnt human
and lets say someone's serving life, witch is like 15 years
if that person dies well then it's unfair. then they will be
sued and government has explaining to do, and potentially have
money to pay up.
Don't get me wrong i see your point of veiw and agree,
that they do get an easy time in prison, but in a court of
Law. The sentence is 15 years and the guy dies in prison, before
the 15 years, someone has to take the blame for it. the
sentence is something like a promise, made in the eyes of the law.
so it's a big deal if it wasn't followed up.
But i respect your views.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 507
Reputation Power: 25
i see where your coming from the criminal must remain in jail for the time specified by the judge / jury and the time is based on his act/crime , but i dont beleive time is enough , they have nothing to do with their time anyway so making them lose their time isnt punishment enough , i think execution is the easy way out , the cowards way out of facing up to what you have done but if you were to cause them pain , i wouldnt go so far as torture but you could call it that but thats essentially what it is , then they would be paying the price for their actions but nothing can ever remove what they have done and the victims must live with it forever
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 208
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: May 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 208
Reputation Power: 8
me personally i think if you commit murder, you should be murdered. Others think that life in jail is worse than death. im not sure whats worse
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 201113Year Member
Posts: 507
Reputation Power: 25
coops1367 wrote me personally i think if you commit murder, you should be murder. Others think that life in jail is worse than death. im not sure whats worsedeath is the cowards way out of facing what you have done , i personally think the chinese water torture method should be used , basically they sit you in a chair and place a drop of water on your head every few seconds , eventually it will send you insane
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.