You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.

Which Formation is better?

4-3-3
42.86% (3 votes)
4-3-2-1
57.14% (4 votes)

Total Votes: 7

Which is the better formation: 4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1 ?
Posted:

Which is the better formation: 4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1 ?Posted:

Robo2405
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 236
Reputation Power: 9
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 236
Reputation Power: 9
Which is the better formation: 4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1 ?

Because I am making a new team and I am not going to change it.

Also which formation is the most expensive?

Thanks TTG


Last edited by Robo2405 ; edited 1 time in total
#2. Posted:
Obasi
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,016
Reputation Power: 44
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,016
Reputation Power: 44
IMO i would have to say 4-3-2-1
#3. Posted:
-Burnley-
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,422
Reputation Power: 64
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 31, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,422
Reputation Power: 64
id say 433 the wingers are more spread out
#4. Posted:
-Forster
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 13, 201013Year Member
Posts: 357
Reputation Power: 13
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 13, 201013Year Member
Posts: 357
Reputation Power: 13
4-3-2-1 is much better wingers cut in for shot and also because the up front is so close you can pearce through a defense easily with a 1-2
#5. Posted:
ManchesterUtd
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 798
Reputation Power: 34
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 01, 201212Year Member
Posts: 798
Reputation Power: 34
4-3-3 more spread out
#6. Posted:
Robo2405
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 236
Reputation Power: 9
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 236
Reputation Power: 9
Well they both sound good
#7. Posted:
Scams
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,641
Reputation Power: 67
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,641
Reputation Power: 67
4-3-3 better attcking and they are more spread out
#8. Posted:
Maze
  • Halloween!
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201112Year Member
Posts: 13,712
Reputation Power: 40360
Motto: The owner of The Tech Game and I share joint custody of a cat named Sophie.
Motto: The owner of The Tech Game and I share joint custody of a cat named Sophie.
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201112Year Member
Posts: 13,712
Reputation Power: 40360
Motto: The owner of The Tech Game and I share joint custody of a cat named Sophie.
4-3-3.
It is more spread apart, like ManchesterUtd said.
#9. Posted:
JesusChrist
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 4,745
Reputation Power: 211
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 4,745
Reputation Power: 211
4321, ignore anyone that says otherwise. In 433, if you go to cross it, the ST isn't usually there, in 4321 he is
#10. Posted:
xSidewinder
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 784
Reputation Power: 30
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 784
Reputation Power: 30
i was evident that4321 was better foralong tim...

i switched my squad for one game, out of formation, which dropped thechem loads but it performed much better

ive sincesoldmy whole team and made a new one in 433

there seems to be players everywhere and it work a charm if you like to go on runs with a singleplayer!
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.