You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 16, 201112Year Member
Posts: 508
Reputation Power: 25
The two more cores the 1045 has makes a big difference in editing/rendering compared to a 4 core phenom 980. first of all higher clock speed doesn't mean its better, since both are 149.99$ and we put on a hyper 212 evo on both the phenom 1045 and 980 the 1045 will reach 3.5ghz easily and the phenom can get to 4.5ghz. The temperatures will be higher since the 980 is a 125watt, but the 1045 will still beat the 980 at rendering because alot of editing programs nowadays support up to 6 cores so the 1045 utilizes 6 cores so you get the best performance even though you will have a lower clock speed. The only reason why no one buys the 6 core cpu's for gaming because that no game will use more than 4 cores therefore its a waste buying a 6 core cpu.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 14, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,246
Reputation Power: 43
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 14, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,246
Reputation Power: 43
Wow this is a lot of reading but i think there all alright though
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 180
Reputation Power: 7
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 180
Reputation Power: 7
i would pick the second one. it is probably going to be better because it has more watts.
- 0useful
- 3not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 16, 201112Year Member
Posts: 508
Reputation Power: 25
Swag_Affliated wrote i would pick the second one. it is probably going to be better because it has more watts.
:facepalm: omg that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
i5-2500k uses 95watts
fx 8150 uses 125watts and the i5 2500k kills the the fx 8150 in every benchmark pretty much and the new ivy bridge is supposed to use less watts that 95 and it will guarantee wreck any amd cpu no matter what the wattage is
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,384
Reputation Power: 64
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,384
Reputation Power: 64
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 261
Reputation Power: 11
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 261
Reputation Power: 11
Wow...
It seems like they got you
a pin point answer lol
It seems like they got you
a pin point answer lol
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
..Well considering you're going to have to upgrade the MOBO whether you go with AMD or Intel, I don't see the point in going with AMD. The 2500k crushes every Bulldozer CPU on the market today. It doesn't consume as much power, highly overclockable, it's a true quad core, and you have a better upgrade path.
4.5ghz 2500k > 4.5ghz 8120.
Here's a 2500k smacking around a $50 more expensive 8150. Now just imagine what the results would be like once you OC....
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
4.5ghz 2500k > 4.5ghz 8120.
Here's a 2500k smacking around a $50 more expensive 8150. Now just imagine what the results would be like once you OC....
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 840
Reputation Power: 50
Generation wrote ..Well considering you're going to have to upgrade the MOBO whether you go with AMD or Intel, I don't see the point in going with AMD. The 2500k crushes every Bulldozer CPU on the market today. It doesn't consume as much power, highly overclockable, it's a true quad core, and you have a better upgrade path.
4.5ghz 2500k > 4.5ghz 8120.
Here's a 2500k smacking around a $50 more expensive 8150. Now just imagine what the results would be like once you OC....
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
This is what I said. AMD is truthfully just for gaming, the intel can handle more load.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 840
Reputation Power: 50
TTG_Code wrote The two more cores the 1045 has makes a big difference in editing/rendering compared to a 4 core phenom 980. first of all higher clock speed doesn't mean its better, since both are 149.99$ and we put on a hyper 212 evo on both the phenom 1045 and 980 the 1045 will reach 3.5ghz easily and the phenom can get to 4.5ghz. The temperatures will be higher since the 980 is a 125watt, but the 1045 will still beat the 980 at rendering because alot of editing programs nowadays support up to 6 cores so the 1045 utilizes 6 cores so you get the best performance even though you will have a lower clock speed. The only reason why no one buys the 6 core cpu's for gaming because that no game will use more than 4 cores therefore its a waste buying a 6 core cpu.
Either way, AMD is more for budget builds and for gaming. Intel can support way more load, and just for a little more money you can get faster render times.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,384
Reputation Power: 64
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,384
Reputation Power: 64
Generation wrote ..Well considering you're going to have to upgrade the MOBO whether you go with AMD or Intel, I don't see the point in going with AMD. The 2500k crushes every Bulldozer CPU on the market today. It doesn't consume as much power, highly overclockable, it's a true quad core, and you have a better upgrade path.
4.5ghz 2500k > 4.5ghz 8120.
Here's a 2500k smacking around a $50 more expensive 8150. Now just imagine what the results would be like once you OC....
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
why would I need to upgrade my mobo? If you could explain it to me that'd be great, I'm more of a software guy than hardware. And what would you recommend for my current PC, I need a faster CPU, but don't really want to upgrade much more, as I only have so much money. Thanks for all these responses.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.