iTriCkz_3D wrote how much is a RGH?

- Want a 1 v 1 of so message me -

same price as a falcon.

xenon-150
falcon-170-180
jasper-200-230
rgh slim-245+

They are both pretty much the same thing, except you can RGH a Slim Xbox but you cannot JTAG the Slim Xbox.

really doesnt matter but i would recommend rgh you can make it a dev nand etc. that u cant do on jtag

I would not suggest getting a falcon, I had one and it had so many problems, and I take care of my consoles ;)

Go with a jasper or slim... RGH's are usually cheaper too so...

There both just different routes of exploitation:

• The original JTAG Exploit involved modifying the SMC (System Management Controller) to allow Unsigned Code to run. However M$ patched the exploit by blowing the eFuses in a System Update (NXE Update).
  
  
• The new RGH (Reset Glitch Hack) Exploit involves modifying how the Bootloaders function by the means of sending a tiny reset pulse to the processor upon Booting. This method of exploitation efficiently alters the Memcmp Function of the Bootloaders to allow Unsigned Code to run. M$ Attempted to patch this by adding a split CB Bootloader, this has been promptly bypassed by Team Xecuter in their new RGH 2.0.
  In addition, because the RGH Method is not a software alteration (unlike the JTAG Method) it has the ability to add a second "Retail" Nand via external Chipset (DualBoot).
  

In my opinion the RGH Method is superior to the JTAG Method because, though it may have a slower BootTime, all xbox Kernels are exploitable (Unlike the JTAG Method where only Xbox's with Pre-NXE Dashboards are exploitable) and the RGH Method also gives the option of a DualNand (One Modified Nand and one Retail Nand (Xbox Live)).

:coffee:

CBD wrote There both just different routes of exploitation:

• The original JTAG Exploit involved modifying the SMC (System Management Controller) to allow Unsigned Code to run. However M$ patched the exploit by blowing the eFuses in a System Update (NXE Update).
  
  
• The new RGH (Reset Glitch Hack) Exploit involves modifying how the Bootloaders function by the means of sending a tiny reset pulse to the processor upon Booting. This method of exploitation efficiently alters the Memcmp Function of the Bootloaders to allow Unsigned Code to run. M$ Attempted to patch this by adding a split CB Bootloader, this has been promptly bypassed by Team Xecuter in their new RGH 2.0.
  In addition, because the RGH Method is not a software alteration (unlike the JTAG Method) it has the ability to add a second "Retail" Nand via external Chipset (DualBoot).
  

In my opinion the RGH Method is superior to the JTAG Method because, though it may have a slower BootTime, all xbox Kernels are exploitable (Unlike the JTAG Method where only Xbox's with Pre-NXE Dashboards are exploitable) and the RGH Method also gives the option of a DualNand (One Modified Nand and one Retail Nand (Xbox Live)).

:coffee:

wow. thats the best explanation of it yet. you deserve rep or gold or something! so basically if i had a choice betweem falcon RGH amd falcon Jtag it really wouldnt matter?

I would get an RGH becuase its better

i think you should get a RGH

JTAG can use KVs
RGH can't use KVs.
JTAG can't use Dev-Kernals
RGH can run Dev-Kernals.

on RGH is much better