ItsEric wrote JTAG can use KVs
RGH can't use KVs.
JTAG can't use Dev-Kernals
RGH can run Dev-Kernals.

well im not planning on running a dev kernel anyway. jtag it is!

Coullon wrote

CBD wrote There both just different routes of exploitation:

• The original JTAG Exploit involved modifying the SMC (System Management Controller) to allow Unsigned Code to run. However M$ patched the exploit by blowing the eFuses in a System Update (NXE Update).
  
  
• The new RGH (Reset Glitch Hack) Exploit involves modifying how the Bootloaders function by the means of sending a tiny reset pulse to the processor upon Booting. This method of exploitation efficiently alters the Memcmp Function of the Bootloaders to allow Unsigned Code to run. M$ Attempted to patch this by adding a split CB Bootloader, this has been promptly bypassed by Team Xecuter in their new RGH 2.0.
  In addition, because the RGH Method is not a software alteration (unlike the JTAG Method) it has the ability to add a second "Retail" Nand via external Chipset (DualBoot).
  

In my opinion the RGH Method is superior to the JTAG Method because, though it may have a slower BootTime, all xbox Kernels are exploitable (Unlike the JTAG Method where only Xbox's with Pre-NXE Dashboards are exploitable) and the RGH Method also gives the option of a DualNand (One Modified Nand and one Retail Nand (Xbox Live)).

:coffee:

wow. thats the best explanation of it yet. you deserve rep or gold or something! so basically if i had a choice betweem falcon RGH amd falcon Jtag it really wouldnt matter?

Thanks, and like I said personally I prefer the RGH Method because it allows for use of a DualNand Chipset that will allow you to switch from your modded RGH Nand to a Retail Nand (Retail nand CAN connect to XBL). And because it can be done to any Console regardless of its Kernel.

RGH, or Reset Glitch Hack, is the same as a JTAG. RGH is just the newer method of making the xbox run unassigned code. They are both the same, but I prefer JTAG.

they are the same thing just different ways of doing the hack

They are pretty much the same. but I would go with a RGH Falcon.

CBD wrote

Coullon wrote

CBD wrote There both just different routes of exploitation:

• The original JTAG Exploit involved modifying the SMC (System Management Controller) to allow Unsigned Code to run. However M$ patched the exploit by blowing the eFuses in a System Update (NXE Update).
  
  
• The new RGH (Reset Glitch Hack) Exploit involves modifying how the Bootloaders function by the means of sending a tiny reset pulse to the processor upon Booting. This method of exploitation efficiently alters the Memcmp Function of the Bootloaders to allow Unsigned Code to run. M$ Attempted to patch this by adding a split CB Bootloader, this has been promptly bypassed by Team Xecuter in their new RGH 2.0.
  In addition, because the RGH Method is not a software alteration (unlike the JTAG Method) it has the ability to add a second "Retail" Nand via external Chipset (DualBoot).
  

In my opinion the RGH Method is superior to the JTAG Method because, though it may have a slower BootTime, all xbox Kernels are exploitable (Unlike the JTAG Method where only Xbox's with Pre-NXE Dashboards are exploitable) and the RGH Method also gives the option of a DualNand (One Modified Nand and one Retail Nand (Xbox Live)).

:coffee:

wow. thats the best explanation of it yet. you deserve rep or gold or something! so basically if i had a choice betweem falcon RGH amd falcon Jtag it really wouldnt matter?

Thanks, and like I said personally I prefer the RGH Method because it allows for use of a DualNand Chipset that will allow you to switch from your modded RGH Nand to a Retail Nand (Retail nand CAN connect to XBL). And because it can be done to any Console regardless of its Kernel.

if i had enough money for a dual chipset i would do that, but i have 220 so falcon jtag with 60gb HDD

Its an opinion. No one can tell you a definite answer.