BF3. MW3 is complete shit. Not even worth 60 dollars.

bf3 SUCKS !!! its online servers suck and it not realistic online.

-ELIT3DEVIL- wrote bf3 SUCKS !!! its online servers suck and it not realistic online.

HA! Since when does a little knife go through a bulletproof vest and automatically kill? Since when does a throwing knife hit someones foot and they die? Since when does a Barrett .50 cal take 1 shot to kill when a Desert Eagle, with the same exact bullet, take 2-3 shots to kill?

I'm sorry that you enjoy lone wolf play. I'm sorry that you depend on your UAV Killstreaks to know where enemies are.

I think you just suck at the game and have no idea what the term teamwork means.

If you want a Harrier to kill people, your ass is gotta fly the damn thing and get kills for yourself. Kid, don't be a codwhore. Look at the facts.

-More realistic
-Better graphics
-Bullets actually DROP!
-No camping because maps are too big to accomplish anything.
-Dedicated servers. No lag.
-You have to use teamwork to win.

Kid. stfu. you obviously have absolutely no idea what the hell you're talking about.

cant compare the games both are different . i like mw3 for shooting etc and i like BF3 for the planes and stuff .

but i play 90% of the time MW3

Stop making wars!!!! first consoles now this!!! GTFO!!!!!!

Auera wrote

-ELIT3DEVIL- wrote bf3 SUCKS !!! its online servers suck and it not realistic online.

HA! Since when does a little knife go through a bulletproof vest and automatically kill? Since when does a throwing knife hit someones foot and they die? Since when does a Barrett .50 cal take 1 shot to kill when a Desert Eagle, with the same exact bullet, take 2-3 shots to kill?

I'm sorry that you enjoy lone wolf play. I'm sorry that you depend on your UAV Killstreaks to know where enemies are.

I think you just suck at the game and have no idea what the term teamwork means.

If you want a Harrier to kill people, your **** is gotta fly the damn thing and get kills for yourself. Kid, don't be a codwhore. Look at the facts.

-More realistic
-Better graphics
-Bullets actually DROP!
-No camping because maps are too big to accomplish anything.
-Dedicated servers. No lag.
-You have to use teamwork to win.

Kid. stfu. you obviously have absolutely no idea what the hell you're talking about.

Yes both 50 cals BUT NOT the same bullet...barret shoots 50 BMG

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


while the desert eagle shoots .50 AE

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

all thou i do agree with your arguement

BF3 is way better. COD lags for me so bad.

They can't be compared. They are two different styles of games.

Battlefield 3.
I'm 20th prestige on MW3 and have found it terrible since like 1st prestige.
I then got Battlefield and about 15 mins into the gameplay I was blown away by the graphics, guns and overall the skill of the players. COD takes no skill, you either camp or run and gun. A 2 year old could do that. Battlefield is a true 1st person shooter which actually takes a bit of strategic thinking to even get you close to winning.