You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Did I Change Your Mind
Yes
0.00% (0 votes)
0.00% (0 votes)
No
100.00% (1 vote)
100.00% (1 vote)
Total Votes: 1
Black Ops...Is It Really That Bad?
Posted:
Black Ops...Is It Really That Bad?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 31, 201113Year Member
Posts: 439
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 31, 201113Year Member
Posts: 439
Reputation Power: 16
Alot of posts im looking through is of people saying black ops sucked....black ops is the worst cod yet. Do Black Ops 2 is gonna Fail
well quite honestly i disagree that black ops sucked.
Heres some of my reasons to try to change your minds.
FIRST OFF!!! does anybody remember the horrid days of mw2 and noob tubing? treyarch did a fantastic job to stop that. sure people still use them here and there but no where as bad as it was on mw2. which iw did nothing to change. Quite honestly i would have stopped playing cod if that wasnt changed. or id be in a hospital suffering from a heart attack from all my raging from them.Haha But Anyway, Moving on
2) the online in my opinion was overall very well balanced compared to past games. sure you had the 74u at the beginning. but trey nerfed it. and now everyone uses the famas. but hey what can you do its not the current cod and why would they spend money to nerf it now. everything besides that is balanced. cod-4 idk if it had an over-powered gun. i started playing xbox in the waw era. but waw=mp-40...mw2=noob tubes/ump-45...mw3=type 95/fmg9/acr (although sledgehammer did nerf fmg9 a bit)
3) treyarch had tried something different with the online. they inplemented cod points. now not everyone liked it, but for me i didnt mind it. however you cant blame them for trying something new. if someone didnt try something new. cod would get very boring from year to year being the exact same every time. who ever said a little variety ever hurt? who knows its either gonna be a HUGE hit or an FAIL!!! but without trying new things you will never get the next big hit
3.5) To add onto the last one with the dlc treyarch also tried something knew. the interactive parts of the maps. for example(ziplines/activated-doors/break-offable drop offs on discovery/berlin wall turrets) this was a different unique thing treyarch implemented which is new to the cod series, and it made the maps more fun to play on. i mean who doesnt like to use the elevaters on hotel, or zipline on kowloon?
4)The Ranking Up System, this was the first cod to experiment with more than 10 prestiges. quite honestly i think the 15 prestiges on this game was ok, only for the fact that there was only 50 levels, instead of 80 and 20 prestiges on mw3 which is far too much and took a long time to get to 80 in the first place too, where 50 didnt seem to bad if there was 15 prestiges, where 80 levels just took way too long in my opinion and too add onto that 20 prestiges. if i had my way id be happy with the black ops system or waw system of 10 prestiges and 65 levels. (again cant speak for cod 4)
5) THE ZOMBIES!!! treyarch had come soo incredibly far with moon from waw zombies and even nacht. does anyone remember how basic of a game mode zombies had started as? with just 4 players 3 doors, wall guns, and a mystery box? now you have perks/teleporters/wonder-guns/easter-eggs/hacker/equipment/boss rounds/ziplines/gravity pads(map specific)/pack a punch/secret songs/achievements/traps/story-line/ and sooo much more!!! treyarch had made this mode evolve so much over that 3 year period. and i cant even imagine what else they have planned for the future besides 8 man zombies/bigger maps/ anything is possible considering now its running off the multiplayer engine!!!
So i ask you to think about it!!! do you really think black ops is as bad of a game as you make it out to be???
well quite honestly i disagree that black ops sucked.
Heres some of my reasons to try to change your minds.
FIRST OFF!!! does anybody remember the horrid days of mw2 and noob tubing? treyarch did a fantastic job to stop that. sure people still use them here and there but no where as bad as it was on mw2. which iw did nothing to change. Quite honestly i would have stopped playing cod if that wasnt changed. or id be in a hospital suffering from a heart attack from all my raging from them.Haha But Anyway, Moving on
2) the online in my opinion was overall very well balanced compared to past games. sure you had the 74u at the beginning. but trey nerfed it. and now everyone uses the famas. but hey what can you do its not the current cod and why would they spend money to nerf it now. everything besides that is balanced. cod-4 idk if it had an over-powered gun. i started playing xbox in the waw era. but waw=mp-40...mw2=noob tubes/ump-45...mw3=type 95/fmg9/acr (although sledgehammer did nerf fmg9 a bit)
3) treyarch had tried something different with the online. they inplemented cod points. now not everyone liked it, but for me i didnt mind it. however you cant blame them for trying something new. if someone didnt try something new. cod would get very boring from year to year being the exact same every time. who ever said a little variety ever hurt? who knows its either gonna be a HUGE hit or an FAIL!!! but without trying new things you will never get the next big hit
3.5) To add onto the last one with the dlc treyarch also tried something knew. the interactive parts of the maps. for example(ziplines/activated-doors/break-offable drop offs on discovery/berlin wall turrets) this was a different unique thing treyarch implemented which is new to the cod series, and it made the maps more fun to play on. i mean who doesnt like to use the elevaters on hotel, or zipline on kowloon?
4)The Ranking Up System, this was the first cod to experiment with more than 10 prestiges. quite honestly i think the 15 prestiges on this game was ok, only for the fact that there was only 50 levels, instead of 80 and 20 prestiges on mw3 which is far too much and took a long time to get to 80 in the first place too, where 50 didnt seem to bad if there was 15 prestiges, where 80 levels just took way too long in my opinion and too add onto that 20 prestiges. if i had my way id be happy with the black ops system or waw system of 10 prestiges and 65 levels. (again cant speak for cod 4)
5) THE ZOMBIES!!! treyarch had come soo incredibly far with moon from waw zombies and even nacht. does anyone remember how basic of a game mode zombies had started as? with just 4 players 3 doors, wall guns, and a mystery box? now you have perks/teleporters/wonder-guns/easter-eggs/hacker/equipment/boss rounds/ziplines/gravity pads(map specific)/pack a punch/secret songs/achievements/traps/story-line/ and sooo much more!!! treyarch had made this mode evolve so much over that 3 year period. and i cant even imagine what else they have planned for the future besides 8 man zombies/bigger maps/ anything is possible considering now its running off the multiplayer engine!!!
So i ask you to think about it!!! do you really think black ops is as bad of a game as you make it out to be???
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 178
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 178
Reputation Power: 6
Black Ops had an awesome story line and sucked me into it, even better if you played WaW story, Multiplayer on black ops was good, mainly because they nurfed everything that was bad but also good, quick scoping wasn't very bad but it also made it a challenge which fun in it's own way, noob-tubing finally got fixed, horrible when playing search and destroy and you get killed by a tube straight away, perks were very well set out as well apart from 1 or 2 being a bit over powered, Zombies has got to be the best thing in a FPS like this, it's not everyday a big company will put effort towards it, starting off as a little unlock-able and becoming one of the biggest mini-games in the CoD franchise.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 16, 201014Year Member
Posts: 4,309
Reputation Power: 179
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 16, 201014Year Member
Posts: 4,309
Reputation Power: 179
xDethKlokx wrote Black Ops had an awesome story line and sucked me into it, even better if you played WaW story, Multiplayer on black ops was good, mainly because they nurfed everything that was bad but also good, quick scoping wasn't very bad but it also made it a challenge which fun in it's own way, noob-tubing finally got fixed, horrible when playing search and destroy and you get killed by a tube straight away, perks were very well set out as well apart from 1 or 2 being a bit over powered, Zombies has got to be the best thing in a FPS like this, it's not everyday a big company will put effort towards it, starting off as a little unlock-able and becoming one of the biggest mini-games in the CoD franchise.
Black ops' campaign deserved the world record it got, and I loved the multiplayer
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 125
Reputation Power: 4
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 125
Reputation Power: 4
Well, I personally think it will be an amazing game. Really the only people who say it will suck is ten year old iW fan girls. Or kids who just hate treyarch. Or kids who want more MW series or some stupid ideology like that. But until it comes out no one can judge.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 215
Reputation Power: 7
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 215
Reputation Power: 7
Black ops was and still is the best call of duty BY FAR The most balanced.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 23, 201212Year Member
Posts: 60
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 23, 201212Year Member
Posts: 60
Reputation Power: 2
TTG-S0LDIER wrote Alot of posts im looking through is of people saying black ops sucked....black ops is the worst cod yet. Do Black Ops 2 is gonna Fail
well quite honestly i disagree that black ops sucked.
Heres some of my reasons to try to change your minds.
FIRST OFF!!! does anybody remember the horrid days of mw2 and noob tubing? treyarch did a fantastic job to stop that. sure people still use them here and there but no where as bad as it was on mw2. which iw did nothing to change. Quite honestly i would have stopped playing cod if that wasnt changed. or id be in a hospital suffering from a heart attack from all my raging from them.Haha But Anyway, Moving on
2) the online in my opinion was overall very well balanced compared to past games. sure you had the 74u at the beginning. but trey nerfed it. and now everyone uses the famas. but hey what can you do its not the current cod and why would they spend money to nerf it now. everything besides that is balanced. cod-4 idk if it had an over-powered gun. i started playing xbox in the waw era. but waw=mp-40...mw2=noob tubes/ump-45...mw3=type 95/fmg9/acr (although sledgehammer did nerf fmg9 a bit)
3) treyarch had tried something different with the online. they inplemented cod points. now not everyone liked it, but for me i didnt mind it. however you cant blame them for trying something new. if someone didnt try something new. cod would get very boring from year to year being the exact same every time. who ever said a little variety ever hurt? who knows its either gonna be a HUGE hit or an FAIL!!! but without trying new things you will never get the next big hit
3.5) To add onto the last one with the dlc treyarch also tried something knew. the interactive parts of the maps. for example(ziplines/activated-doors/break-offable drop offs on discovery/berlin wall turrets) this was a different unique thing treyarch implemented which is new to the cod series, and it made the maps more fun to play on. i mean who doesnt like to use the elevaters on hotel, or zipline on kowloon?
4)The Ranking Up System, this was the first cod to experiment with more than 10 prestiges. quite honestly i think the 15 prestiges on this game was ok, only for the fact that there was only 50 levels, instead of 80 and 20 prestiges on mw3 which is far too much and took a long time to get to 80 in the first place too, where 50 didnt seem to bad if there was 15 prestiges, where 80 levels just took way too long in my opinion and too add onto that 20 prestiges. if i had my way id be happy with the black ops system or waw system of 10 prestiges and 65 levels. (again cant speak for cod 4)
5) THE ZOMBIES!!! treyarch had come soo incredibly far with moon from waw zombies and even nacht. does anyone remember how basic of a game mode zombies had started as? with just 4 players 3 doors, wall guns, and a mystery box? now you have perks/teleporters/wonder-guns/easter-eggs/hacker/equipment/boss rounds/ziplines/gravity pads(map specific)/pack a punch/secret songs/achievements/traps/story-line/ and sooo much more!!! treyarch had made this mode evolve so much over that 3 year period. and i cant even imagine what else they have planned for the future besides 8 man zombies/bigger maps/ anything is possible considering now its running off the multiplayer engine!!!
So i ask you to think about it!!! do you really think black ops is as bad of a game as you make it out to be???
i am only buying this game because of zombied lol
-Real_Talk
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.