You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#31. Posted:
Dada_Life
  • Gold Gifter
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 961
Reputation Power: 49
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 961
Reputation Power: 49
Sexbox360 wrote
JME wrote Two aeroplanes will not be able to take two buildings that size, im sorry but it is virtually impossible on their own especially when the WTC would have been built with strong infrastructure to protect it from stuff such as this and to make the building durable.

You must be dumb and blind not to see this.


This is the most idiotic thing I have ever laid eyes on. This is why there is no hope with humanity.



I love you sir lmao! (no homo)
#32. Posted:
TakeYourKill
  • Challenger
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 09, 201013Year Member
Posts: 169
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 09, 201013Year Member
Posts: 169
Reputation Power: 6
TheGoblin wrote
Temptedd wrote
TheGoblin wrote
Temptedd wrote
TheGoblin wrote
dyllz wrote
Rap wrote People are honestly mental if they think our Government was responsible for the killings of thousands of innocent people.

Obviously you're mental. 9/11 is an inside job every way you look at it.


Explain exactly your thoughts. I bet i can prove everyone wrong.
Watch the video i just posted, i don't think you can prove me wrong now...


Im not watching a 43 minute video on conspiracy bullcrap. Wanna know how gullible you conspiracy theorists are? A man on the popular site liveleak took the video of WTC 7 collapsing, he used after effects to create a crude representation of detonation flashes and explosion sounds (as if it was a demolition) Within minutes of posting the fake video it was reposted 100+ times on youtube, and reblogged on many sites as "new popular evidence" the guy explain how you guys will believe ANYTHING.
Uh, so why when Jesse ventura went to ask about 9/11 did they not want to speak, and why when he talked with a worker at the pentagon, why did she say it was an explosion and not a plane?


Im coming in this discussion. First, You ARE mental if you think this WAS NOT an inside job. Second, its an inside job.

Ok you show me a video, of one frame. a "plane" hitting the pentagon.
Why would the government confiscate the surrounding video tapes from nearby stores, hotels ect. only to release it, couple months later...?

OK, so wheres the debris of the plane? The 9/11 incident, is the first incident in WORLD history, where a plane that has crashed to a building (not tower), or ground, which in result, the whole plane gone, missing, no identifiable bodies, plane structure, nothing that says it was a bowing commercial airlines plane.

Shanks ville Pennsylvania, Where is the plane parts? Where are the bodies? Where was the indestructible "Black Box" kept in the cockpit of the plane? Same goes for the pentagon hit. NO SIGN OF PLANES. So why was there a hole in the ground?


There is video/security footage of a PLANE hitting the pentagon. The entire place is surrounded by cameras
#33. Posted:
Yin
  • TTG Undisputed
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
TheGoblin wrote
JME wrote Two aeroplanes will not be able to take two buildings that size, im sorry but it is virtually impossible on their own especially when the WTC would have been built with strong infrastructure to protect it from stuff such as this and to make the building durable.

You must be dumb and blind not to see this.


Im sorry but you are the idiot here, No buildings are built to be *plane proof*. They are built to regulation standards, also depending upon funding for the project. Burning jet fuel can easily warp metal due to the extreme heat in which it burns, which can cause the final implosion in which the style the buildings fell, the amount of material on the floors above the crash weighed tons upon tons of metal, which can easily destroy the structural integrity of a building of such a size

Those buildings were actualy made plane proof (which means the tower would be damaged, but standing) when the owner decided to reinforce the top floors infrastructure after the Twin Tower bombing of '93. He knew they would attack again but from a different angle, the sky. The jet fuel wouldn't have dont that, couldn't have done that. In order for that to be jet fuel that did that, it would have to have been the near the bottom, on the main support beams. Also, why was thermite pouring from the building? That can easily burn through solid steel. Jet fuel fire would not have collapsed the buildings that perfectly. That building would have fell in more directions than just down. The first tower was standing for 30 minutes before completely collapsing on itself for no reason. When it fell, the fall never slowed down by the resistance of the other floors. In order for that to occur, the main beam had to be weakened and destroyed from top to bottom in multiple spots. It's basic science and everything that the government has said has went against it. One plane hit cannot, and did not, cause that. It makes absolutely no sense how that could happen.
#34. Posted:
xLimitedEditionx
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 31
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 31
Reputation Power: 1
the goverment was behide it they wanted war usa is a fighting machine not in a good way there killing off the men, few hundred thousand is 20 peaple to the goverment
#35. Posted:
JerseyOG
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 65
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 65
Reputation Power: 2
READ

Also if you think of a tree, if you cut it down it falls sideways, right? Well, when the planes hit the towers the towers fell straight down, not sideways. And jet fuel+all the papers and files in the building couldn't burn even close to the temperature it takes to destroy the "heavy duty" metal that is used in skyscrapers and buildings.

George W. Bush had the famous "whisper in the ear" in a classroom. He "claims" he was in the hallway. There are videos of him in the classroom.

Osama Bin Laden was in the American CIA is the 80s and 90s. He was partners with George W. Bush. In the 90s Osama was in a American hospital being treated because of kidney failure. George W. Bush went and visited him and comforted him.
#36. Posted:
Philosophy
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 378
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 378
Reputation Power: 14
JerseyOG wrote READ

Also if you think of a tree, if you cut it down it falls sideways, right? Well, when the planes hit the towers the towers fell straight down, not sideways. And jet fuel+all the papers and files in the building couldn't burn even close to the temperature it takes to destroy the "heavy duty" metal that is used in skyscrapers and buildings.

George W. Bush had the famous "whisper in the ear" in a classroom. He "claims" he was in the hallway. There are videos of him in the classroom.

Osama Bin Laden was in the American CIA is the 80s and 90s. He was partners with George W. Bush. In the 90s Osama was in a American hospital being treated because of kidney failure. George W. Bush went and visited him and comforted him.


OK. The 'heavy duty metal' didn't need to completely break and burn away. It only needed to warp and bend a little. This is why when the building begins to collapse the top floors are slightly leaning to one side. One floor collapses and all above that fall. That would bring the entire building down. The tree analogy was stupid. When a tree falls over it falls from its roots, you're not going to see a tree collapse down into itself are you?

HOWEVER:

I still think it was an inside job because of the explosions seen down the building just before it falls.
#37. Posted:
Goltoof
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 27, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 27, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2
Reputation Power: 0
Structural steel doesn't begin to warp and melt until 3000 degrees. Jet fuel burns at 1900 degrees. The argument of jet fuel dripping down the sides while burning is in itself ridiculous as most of the jet fuel if you notice went up in a huge fireball upon impact. If planes were the cause of the collapse explain to me how they both fell at the exact same speed as a controlled demolition? Building 7 collapsed at the exact same speed and was not even on fire? In fact there was news coverage of its collapse reported before its collapse, suspicious? I think so. When planes hit Structures of that weight it would fall into the point of impact resulting in the building falling sideways in to the damage. Falling into itself with no resistance is impossible. No steel structured building in history has ever fallen from fire until sept. 11th. And to the poster who posted the video of the plane hitting the pentagon...I saw no plane I saw a fireball come from no where. I even played that video frame by frame, no plane. Building to fireball...no plane. That building has a camera ever 50 feet on its roof and all we get is a citgo camera with poor image quality. This is also suspicious. No matter who did what or who was involved I can tell you with certainty that aluminum planes did not cause those buildings to fall.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.