I think 9/11 was bad. And that's about it.

9/11 was bad.

911 was an inside job it was an excuse for the government to drill in iraq

Rebelyous1 wrote Nope it was set up by the government, so they had an excuse to go over to iran and drill for oil. Btw this has been posted many time so it was pointless posting it again...

if we needed oil we would go to Alaska. It is estimated that 10.4 billion barrels of oil exist there. Your ignorance astonishes me...

HAH!
"The government wouldn't do such a thing".
That is the most incorrect thing I have ever heard..

Poll wrote

HAH!
"The government wouldn't do such a thing".
That is the most incorrect thing I have ever heard..

This guy knows what he's talking about.

Poll wrote

HAH!
"The government wouldn't do such a thing".
That is the most incorrect thing I have ever heard..

You cant even drive a car yet and you think you understand our government? We are 16 trillion dollars in debt over a little bit of oil? I have trouble believing that.

Minnesota_Nice wrote

Straight-Edge wrote It was an inside job. Thermite weakened the beams while bombs dropped the building down on itself. Thermite was recording pouring from the building. Multiple people said there were bombs in the building and explosions coming from underneath them. It was basically a controlled demolishing. The structure was too strong for for a plane to bring it down. The plane it too high for it to be jet fuel to bring it down. Let's say jet fuel caused the floors that were on fire to collapse. The plane hit so high up that when the floors fell, they would have at least slowed down. In footage you clearly see explosions all the way down and the building dropping as fast as gravity can push it. Basica science says that is impossible if the floors fell on top of each other like the government said. When falling, the building blew out dust (the pulverished concrete and glass) which only happens in demolishings. If it just fell on itself, chunks of concrete and glass would have fell off of the side, which never happened. If the building fell without a demo, I assure you it would have fell sideways at some point on the way down. This is basic science.

There was no thermite, and when it collapsed the pressure from the floors collapsing caused the windows on every floor to break. People said they heard explosions because when a piece of structural steel breaks it sounds like an earthquake and the pressure of one floor of concrete slamming into another one is pretty loud, like an explosion. Also the "Thermite" you apparently saw in some video was probably magniesum burning at over 5000 F from the wings. Plus the amount of Thermite needed to weaken that much steel would exceed 100 tons easily.

If you honestly still believe that it was an inside job you're an idiot.

Thermite burns hotter than jet fuel burning so no. The thermite was near the bottom, around 10-15 stoies up so it wasn't the plane. Put some thermite on the beams so far down from each other to weaken it and use explosives to blow them out. It was a controlled demo. A building of that size would have toppled at some point if it wasn't calculated to a T. I was saying the concrete from the sides of the building (including glass) would explode into powder, with is what happens in demolishions that involve explosives only. Large chunks should have fell if it was just falling down. There was not enough force or pressure to bring the building down right where it stood. It would have fell over at some point. There was zero resistance force which is scientifically impossible. The floors are heavy, yes, but that doesn't mean there would be zero resistance. The floors are still very strong and durable. One of the building beside it was nearly cut completely in half but was still standing. That makes no sense when compared to the towers. Traces of thermite were found at ground zero as well. Firefighters even said there were bombs in the building. These people know what they are talking about and that is what happened. I'm thinking scientifically and logically. Don't insult my intelligence if you can't even look at 9/11 from a different angle. I have looked at it from every angle and it had to have been at least covered up by the government. What they say happened and what is possible are two different things. The government got us into Veitnam and WW2, so don't think they care about a couple thousand people.

Straight-Edge wrote

Minnesota_Nice wrote

Straight-Edge wrote It was an inside job. Thermite weakened the beams while bombs dropped the building down on itself. Thermite was recording pouring from the building. Multiple people said there were bombs in the building and explosions coming from underneath them. It was basically a controlled demolishing. The structure was too strong for for a plane to bring it down. The plane it too high for it to be jet fuel to bring it down. Let's say jet fuel caused the floors that were on fire to collapse. The plane hit so high up that when the floors fell, they would have at least slowed down. In footage you clearly see explosions all the way down and the building dropping as fast as gravity can push it. Basica science says that is impossible if the floors fell on top of each other like the government said. When falling, the building blew out dust (the pulverished concrete and glass) which only happens in demolishings. If it just fell on itself, chunks of concrete and glass would have fell off of the side, which never happened. If the building fell without a demo, I assure you it would have fell sideways at some point on the way down. This is basic science.

There was no thermite, and when it collapsed the pressure from the floors collapsing caused the windows on every floor to break. People said they heard explosions because when a piece of structural steel breaks it sounds like an earthquake and the pressure of one floor of concrete slamming into another one is pretty loud, like an explosion. Also the "Thermite" you apparently saw in some video was probably magniesum burning at over 5000 F from the wings. Plus the amount of Thermite needed to weaken that much steel would exceed 100 tons easily.

If you honestly still believe that it was an inside job you're an idiot.

Thermite burns hotter than jet fuel burning so no. The thermite was near the bottom, around 10-15 stoies up so it wasn't the plane. Put some thermite on the beams so far down from each other to weaken it and use explosives to blow them out. It was a controlled demo. A building of that size would have toppled at some point if it wasn't calculated to a T. I was saying the concrete from the sides of the building (including glass) would explode into powder, with is what happens in demolishions that involve explosives only. Large chunks should have fell if it was just falling down. There was not enough force or pressure to bring the building down right where it stood. It would have fell over at some point. There was zero resistance force which is scientifically impossible. The floors are heavy, yes, but that doesn't mean there would be zero resistance. The floors are still very strong and durable. One of the building beside it was nearly cut completely in half but was still standing. That makes no sense when compared to the towers. Traces of thermite were found at ground zero as well. Firefighters even said there were bombs in the building. These people know what they are talking about and that is what happened. I'm thinking scientifically and logically. Don't insult my intelligence if you can't even look at 9/11 from a different angle. I have looked at it from every angle and it had to have been at least covered up by the government. What they say happened and what is possible are two different things. The government got us into Veitnam and WW2, so don't think they care about a couple thousand people.

If you really believe the government is willing to kill thousands of its own people why havent you moved yet?