Uncertainty wrote

Straight-Edge wrote

Minnesota_Nice wrote

Straight-Edge wrote It was an inside job. Thermite weakened the beams while bombs dropped the building down on itself. Thermite was recording pouring from the building. Multiple people said there were bombs in the building and explosions coming from underneath them. It was basically a controlled demolishing. The structure was too strong for for a plane to bring it down. The plane it too high for it to be jet fuel to bring it down. Let's say jet fuel caused the floors that were on fire to collapse. The plane hit so high up that when the floors fell, they would have at least slowed down. In footage you clearly see explosions all the way down and the building dropping as fast as gravity can push it. Basica science says that is impossible if the floors fell on top of each other like the government said. When falling, the building blew out dust (the pulverished concrete and glass) which only happens in demolishings. If it just fell on itself, chunks of concrete and glass would have fell off of the side, which never happened. If the building fell without a demo, I assure you it would have fell sideways at some point on the way down. This is basic science.

There was no thermite, and when it collapsed the pressure from the floors collapsing caused the windows on every floor to break. People said they heard explosions because when a piece of structural steel breaks it sounds like an earthquake and the pressure of one floor of concrete slamming into another one is pretty loud, like an explosion. Also the "Thermite" you apparently saw in some video was probably magniesum burning at over 5000 F from the wings. Plus the amount of Thermite needed to weaken that much steel would exceed 100 tons easily.

If you honestly still believe that it was an inside job you're an idiot.

Thermite burns hotter than jet fuel burning so no. The thermite was near the bottom, around 10-15 stoies up so it wasn't the plane. Put some thermite on the beams so far down from each other to weaken it and use explosives to blow them out. It was a controlled demo. A building of that size would have toppled at some point if it wasn't calculated to a T. I was saying the concrete from the sides of the building (including glass) would explode into powder, with is what happens in demolishions that involve explosives only. Large chunks should have fell if it was just falling down. There was not enough force or pressure to bring the building down right where it stood. It would have fell over at some point. There was zero resistance force which is scientifically impossible. The floors are heavy, yes, but that doesn't mean there would be zero resistance. The floors are still very strong and durable. One of the building beside it was nearly cut completely in half but was still standing. That makes no sense when compared to the towers. Traces of thermite were found at ground zero as well. Firefighters even said there were bombs in the building. These people know what they are talking about and that is what happened. I'm thinking scientifically and logically. Don't insult my intelligence if you can't even look at 9/11 from a different angle. I have looked at it from every angle and it had to have been at least covered up by the government. What they say happened and what is possible are two different things. The government got us into Veitnam and WW2, so don't think they care about a couple thousand people.

If you really believe the government is willing to kill thousands of its own people why havent you moved yet?

Because I'm in a low populated area surrounded by woods. If an attack like that happens again, it won't happen here. Governments around the world do this anyway, so technically nowhere is safe. I'm in one of the safest locations. I'm not afraid to die if anything happened here anyway. So anyway you look at it, moving isn't really needed.

Illuminati
Illuminati
Illuminati
I
L
L
U
M
I
N
A
T
E

Straight-Edge wrote

Uncertainty wrote

Straight-Edge wrote

Minnesota_Nice wrote

Straight-Edge wrote It was an inside job. Thermite weakened the beams while bombs dropped the building down on itself. Thermite was recording pouring from the building. Multiple people said there were bombs in the building and explosions coming from underneath them. It was basically a controlled demolishing. The structure was too strong for for a plane to bring it down. The plane it too high for it to be jet fuel to bring it down. Let's say jet fuel caused the floors that were on fire to collapse. The plane hit so high up that when the floors fell, they would have at least slowed down. In footage you clearly see explosions all the way down and the building dropping as fast as gravity can push it. Basica science says that is impossible if the floors fell on top of each other like the government said. When falling, the building blew out dust (the pulverished concrete and glass) which only happens in demolishings. If it just fell on itself, chunks of concrete and glass would have fell off of the side, which never happened. If the building fell without a demo, I assure you it would have fell sideways at some point on the way down. This is basic science.

There was no thermite, and when it collapsed the pressure from the floors collapsing caused the windows on every floor to break. People said they heard explosions because when a piece of structural steel breaks it sounds like an earthquake and the pressure of one floor of concrete slamming into another one is pretty loud, like an explosion. Also the "Thermite" you apparently saw in some video was probably magniesum burning at over 5000 F from the wings. Plus the amount of Thermite needed to weaken that much steel would exceed 100 tons easily.

If you honestly still believe that it was an inside job you're an idiot.

Thermite burns hotter than jet fuel burning so no. The thermite was near the bottom, around 10-15 stoies up so it wasn't the plane. Put some thermite on the beams so far down from each other to weaken it and use explosives to blow them out. It was a controlled demo. A building of that size would have toppled at some point if it wasn't calculated to a T. I was saying the concrete from the sides of the building (including glass) would explode into powder, with is what happens in demolishions that involve explosives only. Large chunks should have fell if it was just falling down. There was not enough force or pressure to bring the building down right where it stood. It would have fell over at some point. There was zero resistance force which is scientifically impossible. The floors are heavy, yes, but that doesn't mean there would be zero resistance. The floors are still very strong and durable. One of the building beside it was nearly cut completely in half but was still standing. That makes no sense when compared to the towers. Traces of thermite were found at ground zero as well. Firefighters even said there were bombs in the building. These people know what they are talking about and that is what happened. I'm thinking scientifically and logically. Don't insult my intelligence if you can't even look at 9/11 from a different angle. I have looked at it from every angle and it had to have been at least covered up by the government. What they say happened and what is possible are two different things. The government got us into Veitnam and WW2, so don't think they care about a couple thousand people.

If you really believe the government is willing to kill thousands of its own people why havent you moved yet?

Because I'm in a low populated area surrounded by woods. If an attack like that happens again, it won't happen here. Governments around the world do this anyway, so technically nowhere is safe. I'm in one of the safest locations. I'm not afraid to die if anything happened here anyway. So anyway you look at it, moving isn't really needed.

Explain to me why they would put themselves in over 15 trillion dollars worth of debt over oil when Alaska has an estimated 10.5 billion barrels(31 gallons per barrel) each gallon selling at over 3 dollars right now?

Uncertainty wrote

Straight-Edge wrote

Uncertainty wrote

Straight-Edge wrote

Minnesota_Nice wrote

Straight-Edge wrote It was an inside job. Thermite weakened the beams while bombs dropped the building down on itself. Thermite was recording pouring from the building. Multiple people said there were bombs in the building and explosions coming from underneath them. It was basically a controlled demolishing. The structure was too strong for for a plane to bring it down. The plane it too high for it to be jet fuel to bring it down. Let's say jet fuel caused the floors that were on fire to collapse. The plane hit so high up that when the floors fell, they would have at least slowed down. In footage you clearly see explosions all the way down and the building dropping as fast as gravity can push it. Basica science says that is impossible if the floors fell on top of each other like the government said. When falling, the building blew out dust (the pulverished concrete and glass) which only happens in demolishings. If it just fell on itself, chunks of concrete and glass would have fell off of the side, which never happened. If the building fell without a demo, I assure you it would have fell sideways at some point on the way down. This is basic science.

There was no thermite, and when it collapsed the pressure from the floors collapsing caused the windows on every floor to break. People said they heard explosions because when a piece of structural steel breaks it sounds like an earthquake and the pressure of one floor of concrete slamming into another one is pretty loud, like an explosion. Also the "Thermite" you apparently saw in some video was probably magniesum burning at over 5000 F from the wings. Plus the amount of Thermite needed to weaken that much steel would exceed 100 tons easily.

If you honestly still believe that it was an inside job you're an idiot.

Thermite burns hotter than jet fuel burning so no. The thermite was near the bottom, around 10-15 stoies up so it wasn't the plane. Put some thermite on the beams so far down from each other to weaken it and use explosives to blow them out. It was a controlled demo. A building of that size would have toppled at some point if it wasn't calculated to a T. I was saying the concrete from the sides of the building (including glass) would explode into powder, with is what happens in demolishions that involve explosives only. Large chunks should have fell if it was just falling down. There was not enough force or pressure to bring the building down right where it stood. It would have fell over at some point. There was zero resistance force which is scientifically impossible. The floors are heavy, yes, but that doesn't mean there would be zero resistance. The floors are still very strong and durable. One of the building beside it was nearly cut completely in half but was still standing. That makes no sense when compared to the towers. Traces of thermite were found at ground zero as well. Firefighters even said there were bombs in the building. These people know what they are talking about and that is what happened. I'm thinking scientifically and logically. Don't insult my intelligence if you can't even look at 9/11 from a different angle. I have looked at it from every angle and it had to have been at least covered up by the government. What they say happened and what is possible are two different things. The government got us into Veitnam and WW2, so don't think they care about a couple thousand people.

If you really believe the government is willing to kill thousands of its own people why havent you moved yet?

Because I'm in a low populated area surrounded by woods. If an attack like that happens again, it won't happen here. Governments around the world do this anyway, so technically nowhere is safe. I'm in one of the safest locations. I'm not afraid to die if anything happened here anyway. So anyway you look at it, moving isn't really needed.

Explain to me why they would put themselves in over 15 trillion dollars worth of debt over oil when Alaska has an estimated 10.5 billion barrels(31 gallons per barrel) each gallon selling at over 3 dollars right now?

I'm not the one that said they did it for money. They could have did it to frame Osama. They could have did it just to create fear so the US citizens would run to them for help. They could have did it to show the world we will protect our people. They could have did it to get more of our troops on Arab soil to build bases to use in the future. There are multiple reasons of why, but I don't know which it was. There is talks that Osama was in on it too and is potentially CIA along with Al Quaeda. I'm not getting into all of that because I don't know why or the facts, but 9/11 was a cover up. I don't know why it was, but it was.

inuyasha555 wrote

9/11 was bad.

Exactly what I was thinking of. HAHAHA

9/11 was set up, just research some evidence.

911 Was clearly set up by the us goverment. it is a shame that our own country would do such a thing

It was a terrorist attack.

Well I Think 9/11 Was Plane Stupid :trollin:
And I Think It Was The Terroists!

Straight-Edge wrote

Uncertainty wrote

Straight-Edge wrote

Uncertainty wrote

Straight-Edge wrote

Minnesota_Nice wrote

Straight-Edge wrote It was an inside job. Thermite weakened the beams while bombs dropped the building down on itself. Thermite was recording pouring from the building. Multiple people said there were bombs in the building and explosions coming from underneath them. It was basically a controlled demolishing. The structure was too strong for for a plane to bring it down. The plane it too high for it to be jet fuel to bring it down. Let's say jet fuel caused the floors that were on fire to collapse. The plane hit so high up that when the floors fell, they would have at least slowed down. In footage you clearly see explosions all the way down and the building dropping as fast as gravity can push it. Basica science says that is impossible if the floors fell on top of each other like the government said. When falling, the building blew out dust (the pulverished concrete and glass) which only happens in demolishings. If it just fell on itself, chunks of concrete and glass would have fell off of the side, which never happened. If the building fell without a demo, I assure you it would have fell sideways at some point on the way down. This is basic science.

There was no thermite, and when it collapsed the pressure from the floors collapsing caused the windows on every floor to break. People said they heard explosions because when a piece of structural steel breaks it sounds like an earthquake and the pressure of one floor of concrete slamming into another one is pretty loud, like an explosion. Also the "Thermite" you apparently saw in some video was probably magniesum burning at over 5000 F from the wings. Plus the amount of Thermite needed to weaken that much steel would exceed 100 tons easily.

If you honestly still believe that it was an inside job you're an idiot.

Thermite burns hotter than jet fuel burning so no. The thermite was near the bottom, around 10-15 stoies up so it wasn't the plane. Put some thermite on the beams so far down from each other to weaken it and use explosives to blow them out. It was a controlled demo. A building of that size would have toppled at some point if it wasn't calculated to a T. I was saying the concrete from the sides of the building (including glass) would explode into powder, with is what happens in demolishions that involve explosives only. Large chunks should have fell if it was just falling down. There was not enough force or pressure to bring the building down right where it stood. It would have fell over at some point. There was zero resistance force which is scientifically impossible. The floors are heavy, yes, but that doesn't mean there would be zero resistance. The floors are still very strong and durable. One of the building beside it was nearly cut completely in half but was still standing. That makes no sense when compared to the towers. Traces of thermite were found at ground zero as well. Firefighters even said there were bombs in the building. These people know what they are talking about and that is what happened. I'm thinking scientifically and logically. Don't insult my intelligence if you can't even look at 9/11 from a different angle. I have looked at it from every angle and it had to have been at least covered up by the government. What they say happened and what is possible are two different things. The government got us into Veitnam and WW2, so don't think they care about a couple thousand people.

If you really believe the government is willing to kill thousands of its own people why havent you moved yet?

Because I'm in a low populated area surrounded by woods. If an attack like that happens again, it won't happen here. Governments around the world do this anyway, so technically nowhere is safe. I'm in one of the safest locations. I'm not afraid to die if anything happened here anyway. So anyway you look at it, moving isn't really needed.

Explain to me why they would put themselves in over 15 trillion dollars worth of debt over oil when Alaska has an estimated 10.5 billion barrels(31 gallons per barrel) each gallon selling at over 3 dollars right now?

I'm not the one that said they did it for money. They could have did it to frame Osama. They could have did it just to create fear so the US citizens would run to them for help. They could have did it to show the world we will protect our people. They could have did it to get more of our troops on Arab soil to build bases to use in the future. There are multiple reasons of why, but I don't know which it was. There is talks that Osama was in on it too and is potentially CIA along with Al Quaeda. I'm not getting into all of that because I don't know why or the facts, but 9/11 was a cover up. I don't know why it was, but it was.

so you think al quaeda are cia ?