You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 08, 201212Year Member
Posts: 19
Reputation Power: 0
its an arcade shooter.. what do you expect
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#22. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 571
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 571
Reputation Power: 18
-Phoenix- wrote They better make the game more like battlefield better graphics more real the way it moves and such. the way you go over barriers and run. The gun customization and classes combining it with how cod works would be amazing, but most of all there better be sniping, quick scoping. They dont like it but if you think they would get a lot more business. But most of all IM TIRED OF SNIPING HIT MARKERS. Body shots would nearly tear you in half from a 50 caliber bullet, those things about a pound they would kill you anywhere if its not the arm or below the waist, and if you get shot below the waist like upper thigh. If they were to make the war more real, the leg would come off, and you would bleed out. Just Im tired of the same cod over and over again there just a few different guns and different maps they never improve anything! The graphics have nearly been the same sense cod 5 like really! Reply if you agree theres a lot more too it but this post would take way to long...
Edit: Plus, They should make the M16 Fully Auto it is in real life. There M4A1 -_- Should really be the m16 because its fully auto and if its 3 round burst it doesn't mean its automatically extremely powerful. And Killstreaks are fun but really? If I go to the marines and kill 7 terrorists that doesnt give me the power to call in a airstike? Just Make tdm and and demo and game modes like that, that dont give killstreaks.
Edit 2: And, Battlefield Knifing/Melee system is far better and People like glide when the prone and move in cod. In cod its like an inhumane slash that would hurt and not even kill someone. Assassination moves in Battlefield is also very cool.
So you want more realism like battlefield has but you want quick scoping? Im sorry but if you want realism then quick scoping would have to go. If a guy with a sniper and a guy with a smg are standing 10 feet away then the guy with the smg would win almost 85% of the time. The other 15% is just if the guy gets lucky or is stronger and has a faster trigger finger. Yet in cod the sniper seems to be winning the majority of those battles. So if they make the game more realistic then you need quick scoping out. Im fine either way but saying you want more realism but you still want quick scoping is kinda weird.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#23. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 215
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 215
Reputation Power: 8
Get over it, it's a game.
Cheeeeeery
Cheeeeeery
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#24. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 496
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 496
Reputation Power: 19
I hate people like you. Call of duty is not supposed to be realistic. Otherwise it would be. You don't deserve to play the call of duty franchise!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.