I can't believe I got on my computer to argue with this moron.

Getting back on my iPad. Have fun believing in a fairy tell.

-Khalifaa- wrote

burnleyesenihc wrote people should believe in the power of medicine to mend the sick not faith or prayer, people should believe in the power of science to feed the hungry not rain dances and rosery beads... 300 years of darwinism tells me i came about on this planet by chemical reaction caused by my parents doin the fandangle a few years back which in turn came after we evolved from our earliest forms, a mystery invisible man didn`t scratch his balls n think ummm il make a man and a woman today and they will be called adam n eve... 64billions years later im sat here typing out this message lol, religion=madness science=answers

Well burn, I think he is not going to read your posts because he doesn't like to be proven wrong. He contradicted himself when he told me I was hiding behind the fact that "he wouldn't prove himself" but every time I ask him a simple question, he completely ignores it and goes on to integrate me on something he knows NOTHING about.

you're such a hypocrite, I already state that I CANNOT prove it false and that you cannot either. I asked you a few questions that I apparantly "know nothing about", and when I asked them, you completely cut me off saying "oh i'm gonna not talk now" because you know you can't answer me logically and correctly. If you're going to talk about proof then SHOW ME SOME PROOF. There's honestly no point in continuing this. *Not because "I'm hiding" but because no matter what we say, no matter what we throw at each other, it won't change a thing. we are just going to move on and see the other as ignorant.

-Khalifaa- wrote

IDLAIxASSASSIN wrote Also think about this. When Darwin saw the cell, he thought of it as "basic". Do you have ANY IDEA how complex a cell is? the complexity of the universe and of everything in it is just TOO precise to just happen by chance. You keep pushing me to prove my theory to be true. Which I currently CAN'T. But you can't prove your theory to be true as well. Oxford and Harvard are having a debate on Darwinism and Punctual Equilibrium. They are constantly proving each other to be false and thinking the other as ignorant. If they are both proving each other false, doesn't that sort of prove them BOTH to be false?

If it is too precise to just happen, then explain to me how it did happen.

I think he's trying to make the point that we don't have the substantial evidence to prove you entirely wrong, but you can never prove yourself right because there is no sensible logic behind it.

IDLAIxASSASSIN wrote

-Khalifaa- wrote

burnleyesenihc wrote people should believe in the power of medicine to mend the sick not faith or prayer, people should believe in the power of science to feed the hungry not rain dances and rosery beads... 300 years of darwinism tells me i came about on this planet by chemical reaction caused by my parents doin the fandangle a few years back which in turn came after we evolved from our earliest forms, a mystery invisible man didn`t scratch his balls n think ummm il make a man and a woman today and they will be called adam n eve... 64billions years later im sat here typing out this message lol, religion=madness science=answers

Well burn, I think he is not going to read your posts because he doesn't like to be proven wrong. He contradicted himself when he told me I was hiding behind the fact that "he wouldn't prove himself" but every time I ask him a simple question, he completely ignores it and goes on to integrate me on something he knows NOTHING about.

you're such a hypocrite, I already state that I CANNOT prove it false and that you cannot either. I asked you a few questions that I apparantly "know nothing about", and when I asked them, you completely cut me off saying "oh i'm gonna not talk now" because you know you can't answer me logically and correctly. If you're going to talk about proof then SHOW ME SOME PROOF. There's honestly no point in continuing this. *Not because "I'm hiding" but because no matter what we say, no matter what we throw at each other, it won't change a thing. we are just going to move on and see the other as ignorant.

I already have proven it wrong? Did you just ignore Burn's post and the main OP? God, you know nothing about religion nor on literature. Good night folks.

Ronnie-Radke wrote

-Khalifaa- wrote

IDLAIxASSASSIN wrote Also think about this. When Darwin saw the cell, he thought of it as "basic". Do you have ANY IDEA how complex a cell is? the complexity of the universe and of everything in it is just TOO precise to just happen by chance. You keep pushing me to prove my theory to be true. Which I currently CAN'T. But you can't prove your theory to be true as well. Oxford and Harvard are having a debate on Darwinism and Punctual Equilibrium. They are constantly proving each other to be false and thinking the other as ignorant. If they are both proving each other false, doesn't that sort of prove them BOTH to be false?

If it is too precise to just happen, then explain to me how it did happen.

I think he's trying to make the point that we don't have the substantial evidence to prove you entirely wrong, but you can never prove yourself right because there is no sensible logic behind it.

THANKYOU. someone who actually understands the point i'm making. :facepalm:

Ronnie-Radke wrote

-Khalifaa- wrote

IDLAIxASSASSIN wrote Also think about this. When Darwin saw the cell, he thought of it as "basic". Do you have ANY IDEA how complex a cell is? the complexity of the universe and of everything in it is just TOO precise to just happen by chance. You keep pushing me to prove my theory to be true. Which I currently CAN'T. But you can't prove your theory to be true as well. Oxford and Harvard are having a debate on Darwinism and Punctual Equilibrium. They are constantly proving each other to be false and thinking the other as ignorant. If they are both proving each other false, doesn't that sort of prove them BOTH to be false?

If it is too precise to just happen, then explain to me how it did happen.

I think he's trying to make the point that we don't have the substantial evidence to prove you entirely wrong, but you can never prove yourself right because there is no sensible logic behind it.

There is no sensible logic behind what I am posting? Everything that I am posting has been scientifically PROVEN.

-Khalifaa- wrote

Ronnie-Radke wrote

-Khalifaa- wrote

IDLAIxASSASSIN wrote Also think about this. When Darwin saw the cell, he thought of it as "basic". Do you have ANY IDEA how complex a cell is? the complexity of the universe and of everything in it is just TOO precise to just happen by chance. You keep pushing me to prove my theory to be true. Which I currently CAN'T. But you can't prove your theory to be true as well. Oxford and Harvard are having a debate on Darwinism and Punctual Equilibrium. They are constantly proving each other to be false and thinking the other as ignorant. If they are both proving each other false, doesn't that sort of prove them BOTH to be false?

If it is too precise to just happen, then explain to me how it did happen.

I think he's trying to make the point that we don't have the substantial evidence to prove you entirely wrong, but you can never prove yourself right because there is no sensible logic behind it.

There is no sensible logic behind what I am posting? Everything that I am posting has been scientifically PROVEN.

You can't scientifically prove a story coming from the bible... It's the bible.

Ronnie-Radke wrote

-Khalifaa- wrote

Ronnie-Radke wrote

-Khalifaa- wrote

IDLAIxASSASSIN wrote Also think about this. When Darwin saw the cell, he thought of it as "basic". Do you have ANY IDEA how complex a cell is? the complexity of the universe and of everything in it is just TOO precise to just happen by chance. You keep pushing me to prove my theory to be true. Which I currently CAN'T. But you can't prove your theory to be true as well. Oxford and Harvard are having a debate on Darwinism and Punctual Equilibrium. They are constantly proving each other to be false and thinking the other as ignorant. If they are both proving each other false, doesn't that sort of prove them BOTH to be false?

If it is too precise to just happen, then explain to me how it did happen.

I think he's trying to make the point that we don't have the substantial evidence to prove you entirely wrong, but you can never prove yourself right because there is no sensible logic behind it.

There is no sensible logic behind what I am posting? Everything that I am posting has been scientifically PROVEN.

You can't scientifically prove a story coming from the bible... It's the bible.

What? Can you read?
Nothing I have said has come from the bible, other than Noah's ark, and that can be proven or disproven which it has.

-Khalifaa- wrote

Ronnie-Radke wrote

-Khalifaa- wrote

Ronnie-Radke wrote

-Khalifaa- wrote

IDLAIxASSASSIN wrote Also think about this. When Darwin saw the cell, he thought of it as "basic". Do you have ANY IDEA how complex a cell is? the complexity of the universe and of everything in it is just TOO precise to just happen by chance. You keep pushing me to prove my theory to be true. Which I currently CAN'T. But you can't prove your theory to be true as well. Oxford and Harvard are having a debate on Darwinism and Punctual Equilibrium. They are constantly proving each other to be false and thinking the other as ignorant. If they are both proving each other false, doesn't that sort of prove them BOTH to be false?

If it is too precise to just happen, then explain to me how it did happen.

I think he's trying to make the point that we don't have the substantial evidence to prove you entirely wrong, but you can never prove yourself right because there is no sensible logic behind it.

There is no sensible logic behind what I am posting? Everything that I am posting has been scientifically PROVEN.

You can't scientifically prove a story coming from the bible... It's the bible.

What? Can you read?
Nothing I have said has come from the bible, other than Noah's ark, and that can be proven or disproven which it has.

The truth is evolution is real, we evolve animals evolve thats why there is white rabbits in the snow. They evolved to survive same thing with owls,bears,ect its stupid how people blindly believe in god if you just thought about things like the arc its non logical a bunch a stupid people made a book and told people GOD IS REAL and ever since people believed in a hairy man that lives in the sky

typical christian hullabaloo, religion has been constructed to confuse no matter how you look at it you`ll never get a straight answer.. i was recently in jail and attended bible studies i will admit it was interseting but whenever i put to him a scientific explaination of evolution he just kept shruggin it off sayin science was irrelavent in the world of god... so i said if this is the case the why wont the vatican allow the turin shroud to be scientifically examined?? this is supposed to be the cloth jesus was buried in so if this is the case surely they would let it be tested and proven that jesus was a real man.. in turn this would prove god was real or existed in some way.. lol it even make me laugh because im pretty sure that the hadron collider was created in the name of science to find the 'god partical' or dark matter... this being the base compound for our creation