Well they 343 Industries said the ranking system will be like Halo Reaches, But if they had a raning system like Halo 3 then it would be amazing! Especially if the highest skill was a 100

Yeah but they'll just ignore what we're really asking for.

Halo4 wrote If 343i could develop the Ranking system to be really skillful, as in you get matched with people that have similar KD/s, Win/Loss Ratio, etc. and you could rank up/down in the "Prestige" Ranking System, then I'd be fine with that.

Hm.. not sure if the KD thing would be bad or not.. since people might mess around to get their KD down on purpose so they could face off against people who suck.. but I want it so you could get ranked down in Halo 4.

It was announced yesterday that there making one, for the game.

I would pick 1-50 because I stayed on halo 3 for 5 years best time of my life

Go to stubbyvideos on youtube. He talks about it and 343 are working on a true CRS (competitive ranking system) but they are not allowing it on the launch. Meaning like maybe next year, through a title update, there will be a true ranking system

STMx_T3RMiNATOR wrote

Nerdy_Jtags wrote Okay let me start by saying this, if you we're trying to get a level 50 true skill in h3 you we're annoyed by the boosters. But honestly would you care if you had boosters that much in Halo 4. I mean The reason why I'm saying this is because it seems like every big time is saying that's to bad, which it is. What I'm saying is that If you we're trying to get a 50 it was the reason you played Halo 3. If Halo 4 had a 1-50 Ranking system then you know how long that would extend the game to a competitive stand point. I mean if you could just prestige that 50 with the same Exp or different symbols then it would be so cool, starting over after getting that 50 but having something to show for it would be amazing. Now, it would also stop people from making a decent amount of accounts to sell. I mean you can't stop what people are going to do. JUST SAYING!

The People that voted for Win/Loss Ranking System might mean that they suck at the game and want a similar ranking system to Halo Reach I would Like a Prestiging System. By the way there called Spartan Points and I'm not sure if thats in Cr or HSR.

I voted for win/loss ratio thinking you meant if you won you leveled up and if you lost you de ranked so I don't know what your talking about. btw in reach you didn't rank up if you won or loss. You ranked up for everything it really didn't matter . IF that was the case I would of been the highest rank by now.

Lays wrote

STMx_T3RMiNATOR wrote

Nerdy_Jtags wrote Okay let me start by saying this, if you we're trying to get a level 50 true skill in h3 you we're annoyed by the boosters. But honestly would you care if you had boosters that much in Halo 4. I mean The reason why I'm saying this is because it seems like every big time is saying that's to bad, which it is. What I'm saying is that If you we're trying to get a 50 it was the reason you played Halo 3. If Halo 4 had a 1-50 Ranking system then you know how long that would extend the game to a competitive stand point. I mean if you could just prestige that 50 with the same Exp or different symbols then it would be so cool, starting over after getting that 50 but having something to show for it would be amazing. Now, it would also stop people from making a decent amount of accounts to sell. I mean you can't stop what people are going to do. JUST SAYING!

The People that voted for Win/Loss Ranking System might mean that they suck at the game and want a similar ranking system to Halo Reach I would Like a Prestiging System. By the way there called Spartan Points and I'm not sure if thats in Cr or HSR.

I voted for win/loss ratio thinking you meant if you won you leveled up and if you lost you de ranked so I don't know what your talking about. btw in reach you didn't rank up if you won or loss. You ranked up for everything it really didn't matter . IF that was the case I would of been the highest rank by now.

1-50 is the the win/loss, the regular win/loss is with no rank like reach.

STMx_T3RMiNATOR wrote

Nerdy_Jtags wrote Okay let me start by saying this, if you we're trying to get a level 50 true skill in h3 you we're annoyed by the boosters. But honestly would you care if you had boosters that much in Halo 4. I mean The reason why I'm saying this is because it seems like every big time is saying that's to bad, which it is. What I'm saying is that If you we're trying to get a 50 it was the reason you played Halo 3. If Halo 4 had a 1-50 Ranking system then you know how long that would extend the game to a competitive stand point. I mean if you could just prestige that 50 with the same Exp or different symbols then it would be so cool, starting over after getting that 50 but having something to show for it would be amazing. Now, it would also stop people from making a decent amount of accounts to sell. I mean you can't stop what people are going to do. JUST SAYING!

The People that voted for Win/Loss Ranking System might mean that they suck at the game and want a similar ranking system to Halo Reach I would Like a Prestiging System. By the way there called Spartan Points and I'm not sure if thats in Cr or HSR.

go play call of duty then. im tired of people who want to implement call of duty elements into EVERY damn game. Halo is NOT in ANY way call of duty. you dont like trueskill ranking and you would rather get xp, go play call of duty, because thats not halo

Snipul wrote Bring back the Halo3 Ranking system!

I won 115 games in a row in lonewolfs on halo3 to get my 50 and that gave me the chills and so much excitement! but on halo reach no excitement/chills at all

Exactly! i miss it so much its crazy