You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 29, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,185
Reputation Power: 68
there wont be beta , thats what i think.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,345
Reputation Power: 60
-LiquidCooled- wrote My opinion.well looking and doing research i kinda do think there will be a beta like MoH is.and due to the fact it says Coming soon kinda makes it true plus they havnt talked about new maps or crap xp has been given away in wave 2 so i defintly think there will be
It seems perfectly logical,
My opinion is that the "Coming Soon!" icon will be available tomorrow for people to sign up for the beta using their pre-order code
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 660
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 660
Reputation Power: 29
HaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote There was no private beta
Phoenix was a private build for Q&A Testers (NOT a beta)
The Gamescom build is not the Phoenix build
There will not be a beta, why? One major reason. Servers.
The resources server-wise for BO2 are not yet available (we saw this when the servers went down when the beta was leaked, no they didn't take them down, the Q&A servers are designed for a maximum of 50 people), Vaunderhaar even stated there was a possibility they won't be 100% on release day.
It was a Beta, on the top right-hand corner it said "beta 22.4.3"
How do you know all this, or are you just making things up?
Sources?
It's not the kind of "beta" you are thinking about, it wasn't like "You work for Treyarch here's a game!" thing it's a very exclusive process, like I said, 50 people tops.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,345
Reputation Power: 60
magiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote There was no private beta
Phoenix was a private build for Q&A Testers (NOT a beta)
The Gamescom build is not the Phoenix build
There will not be a beta, why? One major reason. Servers.
The resources server-wise for BO2 are not yet available (we saw this when the servers went down when the beta was leaked, no they didn't take them down, the Q&A servers are designed for a maximum of 50 people), Vaunderhaar even stated there was a possibility they won't be 100% on release day.
It was a Beta, on the top right-hand corner it said "beta 22.4.3"
How do you know all this, or are you just making things up?
Sources?
It's not the kind of "beta" you are thinking about, it wasn't like "You work for Treyarch here's a game!" thing it's a very exclusive process, like I said, 50 people tops.
How do you know that they are designed to hold only 50 people
Last edited by TTU ; edited 1 time in total
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 660
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 660
Reputation Power: 29
HaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote There was no private beta
Phoenix was a private build for Q&A Testers (NOT a beta)
The Gamescom build is not the Phoenix build
There will not be a beta, why? One major reason. Servers.
The resources server-wise for BO2 are not yet available (we saw this when the servers went down when the beta was leaked, no they didn't take them down, the Q&A servers are designed for a maximum of 50 people), Vaunderhaar even stated there was a possibility they won't be 100% on release day.
It was a Beta, on the top right-hand corner it said "beta 22.4.3"
How do you know all this, or are you just making things up?
Sources?
It's not the kind of "beta" you are thinking about, it wasn't like "You work for Treyarch here's a game!" thing it's a very exclusive process, like I said, 50 people tops.
Hw do you know that they they are designed to hold only 50 people
That's a good question
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,345
Reputation Power: 60
magiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote There was no private beta
Phoenix was a private build for Q&A Testers (NOT a beta)
The Gamescom build is not the Phoenix build
There will not be a beta, why? One major reason. Servers.
The resources server-wise for BO2 are not yet available (we saw this when the servers went down when the beta was leaked, no they didn't take them down, the Q&A servers are designed for a maximum of 50 people), Vaunderhaar even stated there was a possibility they won't be 100% on release day.
It was a Beta, on the top right-hand corner it said "beta 22.4.3"
How do you know all this, or are you just making things up?
Sources?
It's not the kind of "beta" you are thinking about, it wasn't like "You work for Treyarch here's a game!" thing it's a very exclusive process, like I said, 50 people tops.
Hw do you know that they they are designed to hold only 50 people
That's a good question
It is, and I would like to know the answer.
What you are telling us is only true if....
a) you have sources
b) you work for Treyarch
I 100% doubt it's option (b)
I also doubt you have sources
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 660
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 660
Reputation Power: 29
HaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote There was no private beta
Phoenix was a private build for Q&A Testers (NOT a beta)
The Gamescom build is not the Phoenix build
There will not be a beta, why? One major reason. Servers.
The resources server-wise for BO2 are not yet available (we saw this when the servers went down when the beta was leaked, no they didn't take them down, the Q&A servers are designed for a maximum of 50 people), Vaunderhaar even stated there was a possibility they won't be 100% on release day.
It was a Beta, on the top right-hand corner it said "beta 22.4.3"
How do you know all this, or are you just making things up?
Sources?
It's not the kind of "beta" you are thinking about, it wasn't like "You work for Treyarch here's a game!" thing it's a very exclusive process, like I said, 50 people tops.
Hw do you know that they they are designed to hold only 50 people
That's a good question
It is, and I would like to know the answer.
What you are telling us is only true if....
a) you have sources
b) you work for Treyarch
I 100% doubt it's option (b)
I also doubt you have sources
Although I love Treyarch it's pretty safe to assume I don't work with them,as for sources don't worry about it, there's no reason to admit to something or unveil a source of information on a public forum, we all know that never ends well. If you don't want to believe me that's fine, nothing I am saying is really very influential in the grand scheme of things.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,345
Reputation Power: 60
magiikmodderz wrote [spoil]HaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote There was no private beta
Phoenix was a private build for Q&A Testers (NOT a beta)
The Gamescom build is not the Phoenix build
There will not be a beta, why? One major reason. Servers.
The resources server-wise for BO2 are not yet available (we saw this when the servers went down when the beta was leaked, no they didn't take them down, the Q&A servers are designed for a maximum of 50 people), Vaunderhaar even stated there was a possibility they won't be 100% on release day.
It was a Beta, on the top right-hand corner it said "beta 22.4.3"
How do you know all this, or are you just making things up?
Sources?
It's not the kind of "beta" you are thinking about, it wasn't like "You work for Treyarch here's a game!" thing it's a very exclusive process, like I said, 50 people tops.
Hw do you know that they they are designed to hold only 50 people
That's a good question
It is, and I would like to know the answer.
What you are telling us is only true if....
a) you have sources
b) you work for Treyarch
I 100% doubt it's option (b)
I also doubt you have sources
Although I love Treyarch it's pretty safe to assume I don't work with them,as for sources don't worry about it, there's no reason to admit to something or unveil a source of information on a public forum, we all know that never ends well. If you don't want to believe me that's fine, nothing I am saying is really very influential in the grand scheme of things.
You need to provide a source, or you are just providing flse info. Nobody is certain of anything. It's all based on opinions, but at least I have my sources for my opinions.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 660
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201013Year Member
Posts: 660
Reputation Power: 29
HaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote [spoil]HaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote There was no private beta
Phoenix was a private build for Q&A Testers (NOT a beta)
The Gamescom build is not the Phoenix build
There will not be a beta, why? One major reason. Servers.
The resources server-wise for BO2 are not yet available (we saw this when the servers went down when the beta was leaked, no they didn't take them down, the Q&A servers are designed for a maximum of 50 people), Vaunderhaar even stated there was a possibility they won't be 100% on release day.
It was a Beta, on the top right-hand corner it said "beta 22.4.3"
How do you know all this, or are you just making things up?
Sources?
It's not the kind of "beta" you are thinking about, it wasn't like "You work for Treyarch here's a game!" thing it's a very exclusive process, like I said, 50 people tops.
Hw do you know that they they are designed to hold only 50 people
That's a good question
It is, and I would like to know the answer.
What you are telling us is only true if....
a) you have sources
b) you work for Treyarch
I 100% doubt it's option (b)
I also doubt you have sources
Although I love Treyarch it's pretty safe to assume I don't work with them,as for sources don't worry about it, there's no reason to admit to something or unveil a source of information on a public forum, we all know that never ends well. If you don't want to believe me that's fine, nothing I am saying is really very influential in the grand scheme of things.
You need to provide a source, or you are just providing flse info. Nobody is certain of anything. It's all based on opinions, but at least I have my sources for my opinions.
then call it personal experience...
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,345
Reputation Power: 60
magiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote [spoil]HaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wroteHaloCEA wrotemagiikmodderz wrote There was no private beta
Phoenix was a private build for Q&A Testers (NOT a beta)
The Gamescom build is not the Phoenix build
There will not be a beta, why? One major reason. Servers.
The resources server-wise for BO2 are not yet available (we saw this when the servers went down when the beta was leaked, no they didn't take them down, the Q&A servers are designed for a maximum of 50 people), Vaunderhaar even stated there was a possibility they won't be 100% on release day.
It was a Beta, on the top right-hand corner it said "beta 22.4.3"
How do you know all this, or are you just making things up?
Sources?
It's not the kind of "beta" you are thinking about, it wasn't like "You work for Treyarch here's a game!" thing it's a very exclusive process, like I said, 50 people tops.
Hw do you know that they they are designed to hold only 50 people
That's a good question
It is, and I would like to know the answer.
What you are telling us is only true if....
a) you have sources
b) you work for Treyarch
I 100% doubt it's option (b)
I also doubt you have sources
Although I love Treyarch it's pretty safe to assume I don't work with them,as for sources don't worry about it, there's no reason to admit to something or unveil a source of information on a public forum, we all know that never ends well. If you don't want to believe me that's fine, nothing I am saying is really very influential in the grand scheme of things.
You need to provide a source, or you are just providing flse info. Nobody is certain of anything. It's all based on opinions, but at least I have my sources for my opinions.
then call it personal experience...
Okay, 'nuff said.
He has no proof, once again, that the beta theory is false
- 0useful
- 2not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.