You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
mramazingvictor
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 218
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 218
Reputation Power: 8
I dont understand how are people putting 4-2 team against 6-0 or 5-1 teams
#12. Posted:
mramazingvictor
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 218
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 218
Reputation Power: 8
My new power rankings
1 Atlanta
2 Baltimore
3 Houston
4 Chicago
5 San francisco
6 New York Giants
7 Arizona
8 Seattle
9 minnesota
10 Denver
#13. Posted:
matt12321
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 67
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 67
Reputation Power: 2
mramazingvictor wrote I dont understand how are people putting 4-2 team against 6-0 or 5-1 teams
W-L records dont always matter

@FzyK:I'm not saying the Giants should be ranked top 5, but they should atleast be ranked better than Chicago. If you look at the teams Chicago has played, none of them have a winning record, but the Giants beat the 49ers which is probably the best D in the league.
#14. Posted:
mramazingvictor
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 218
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 218
Reputation Power: 8
records do actually matter
#15. Posted:
matt12321
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 67
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 67
Reputation Power: 2
mramazingvictor wrote records do actually matter
yea, but not always, look at last years Giants, they were 9-7 and beat the 15-1 packers and the 13-3 niners in the playoffs.
#16. Posted:
mramazingvictor
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 218
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 218
Reputation Power: 8
but thats who they beat. records are for playoffs
#17. Posted:
Lite
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,452
Reputation Power: 107
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,452
Reputation Power: 107
FzyK wrote
NYG wrote How do you have the Bears so high?
Here is mine:
1. Atlanta
2. San Francisco
3. Houston
4. Green Bay
5. Giants


I mean.. the Bears have a better record than the Giants, plus the Giants lost to the Cowboys, how do you have the Giants so high? Same thing with Green Bay.



Lite wrote 1. Giants
2. Packers
3. Atlanta
4. Pats
5. Eagles

Disagree? Tell me why.


As a Philadelphian, I disagree with you having the Eagles in the top 5, because our offensive line is horrendous, and their secondary is cheeks. Aside from that, I think Atlanta should be higher than 3, especially if Packers and Giants are your 1 and 2. The Giants lost to the Eagles and Cowboys, and the Packers are struggling with offensive line problems aswell, Rodgers doesn't look comfortable being pressured.

To be honest i always try to give the eagles the benefit of the doubt as for whatever reason they really irritate me. The giants are a weird team. They play poorly but shine when the end of the season comes. If they play like there win against the 49'er they very well could repeat a Superbowl win. As far as Atlanta goes they have nearly chocked against teams that are quite untalented twice i'm just not sold on them quite yet. I feel similarly about the texans they were destroyed by the packers given the packers looked unstoppable. BTW i'm a denver broncos fan so i'm not picking my own team lol.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.