Rib wrote Why do people automatically compare this game to CoD? They're COMPLETELY different games with different audiences. Halo takes a hell of a lot more skill to play than CoD.

Not BO2, shit my K/D in Halo is waaay higher than my BO2 one. The DMR is easy as hell to use, and sniping isn't as hard as it use to be. Don't forget the frag grenade DMR combo, that's easy as hell to do too.

Anyway I feel 343 just had to dumb down the game for the newer audience, and to no suprise, the general TTG population loves the ranking system lmao.

Note to fanboys: I never said the game was bad or that COD is better.

all i'm reading is COD COD COD.
go to a COD form and talk about how good it is there.
Halo 4 is pretty bad. but good game to play with your friends to have a good time,
i'm a 100% percent halo 3 fan.
BR took skill to use,
still does. in halo with the DMR and other guns.
don't even Get me Started with Campaign sure good but wasn't Halo:Reach Before halo 1.
and they all died but Chief?
now we find out Infinity has a whole damn Army.
Campaign Good gameplay but bad Story.

The game is too similar to the other ones.

I got bored of it so fast.

Your just crying cuz u suck its ok to suck at games kid.

mooreuk wrote I havent played campaign only the multiplayer and I have to agree. It sucks online!

Now before anyone starts saying 'you hate it because you suck etc...'

They have taken the main aspect of halo.. A game of skill, High Skill and Ranked games do not exist. You are not matched in with people your own skill level.

Weapon loadouts.. Everyone should have the same load out

No weapon pickups.. havning no power weapons on the map sucks, it takes away main places of maps that players fight for.

Okay, first of all not gettin matched up with people your own skill level can only make you better, same with the whole "Everyone should have the same load out". Also there are power weapons on the map for people to fight over on game modes such as slayer. So all of the points you just made are you just jumping on the "band wagon" with all the people who just try to find the "bad" in halo 4 instead of looking for the good qualitys. Thanks for your time.

The thing is, people complain that the game doesn't have these aspects to it, then when they are added people get pissed. I honestly think 343 did A LOT better than they did with Halo: Reach. I don't know what connection you're running on, but I find games easily that are all lagg free. I will agree the campaign was too short but 343 did a good job with keeping players from running around enemies to get to an objective. I was also impressed with how they conveyed Chief's sadness so well in the end even though you can't see his face. The multiplayer does require a lot more teamwork in order to win, which can be good or bad.


All in all I think that buying Halo 4 will provide me with way more hours of fun than Black Ops 2 ever could have.
The one thing I am afraid of for Halo 5 and 6 is that they will make it repetitive like all of the CoD games.

im sorry but your stupid id explain in detail about how wrong you are but itd be to much to type

it's not a let down you just expected too much

Valid argument i must say. As for not understanding the campaign, i believe one will only understand a majority of things that happened if you read a lot of information about the forerunners etc prior to the game. So basically i didn't i have problems understanding anything because i spent hours reading information on Halo Nation and some extracts from the books. But i guess a campaign should give you all the answers and you shouldn't have to go elsewhere to find them.

I had hoped the multiplayer would bring back the original Halo experience but it didn't sadly.

As a long time Halo fan, overall i love everything about Halo 4 even if it does have its faults but 343 may learn from this and improve for the release of Halo 5 hopefully.

Yes i agree Halo4 is not good as H3 is but Still better then halo reach i think